Schneier Asks Why We Accept Fax Signatures
Bruce Schneier's latest commentary looks into one of my pet peeves: faxed signature requirements. He writes "Aren't fax signatures the weirdest thing? It's trivial to cut and paste -- with real scissors and glue -- anyone's signature onto a document so that it'll look real when faxed. There is so little security in fax signatures that it's mind-boggling that anyone accepts them. Yet people do, all the time. I've signed book contracts, credit card authorizations, nondisclosure..." It's amazing how organizations are sometimes willing to accept low-quality, unverified scans delivered over POTS as authoritative, when they won't take the same information in a high-resolution scan delivered over (relatively secure) email.
By the way, the plural of "melon" is "mellon", not "melons".
(-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
Yeah, but then why would you use 'a' in your sentence instead of 'some' "black and white watermellon" or leave out the 'a' entirely.
/\
or is it a case of:
---- Joke
0
-me-
This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.