Slashdot Mirror


Search For RMS Titanic Was a Cover Story

wiredog writes "According to National Geographic, Robert Ballard's search for the RMS Titanic in 1985 was a cover operation for the real search: They were looking for the USS Thresher and USS Scorpion, two US nuclear submarines that sank during the Cold War." ABC News also has a story on this two-fer undersea search.

15 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. This is either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a test to measure the international paranoia level or a carefully timed admission, now that nobody would be surprised anymore about the US faking a civil operation to hide military objectives.

  2. Doesn't Compute by headhot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I call BS. The USN knew exactly where the Thresher when down as if failed durring monitored sea trials, and knew that the Scorpion didn't go down in the North Atlantic.

  3. Uh, duh? by grocer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Didn't anybody else wonder how Ballard got funding for a picture taking expedition? Salvage in the ocean is basically anyone's ball game and is funded on premise of profit...who else other than the Navy would be funding essentially R&D for salvage without salvaging anything?

  4. Anyone else notice.... by arkham6 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That the navy wanted to chuck nuclear waste into the OCEAN!?!

    1. Re:Anyone else notice.... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Where do you think most of the decommissioned Russian nuke boats ended up? They towed them north and either opened the bilges or spent the afternoon firing torpedoes into them. I'd be willing to bet dollars to donuts that there are some unholy nuclear messes around the arctic circle.

      The only difference being that the USSR didn't have much of an EPA to contend with. "Dump it in the ocean" was SOP for many countries for a long time. It doesn't make it right, but to think that we were the only ones is silly.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  5. Re:Old News by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Like they refused to participate in America's war? :) WWII?
    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  6. Re:Old News by Torvaun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That was America participating in Europe's war.

    --
    I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
  7. don't forget how far deep the Atlantic is by Quadraginta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Knowing where on the surface the Thresher went down is quite different from knowing where she lies on the bottom, 11,000 or so feet below. Ships travel significant distances on their way to the bottom, since they don't just drop vertically. Not only are there currents, but also the boat is not spherical, so it has more hydrodynamic resistance in some aspects than others. That makes it glide and twirl down like a leaf falling through air. It's also breaking apart on the way, and releasing air, and these impulses further push and pull on the wreckage as it sinks. They reach a respectable downward velocity, probably 40-80 MPH near the end, but even so it takes a good 5-10 minutes to get to the bottom. Plenty of time to travel many miles horizontally.

    In any event, the purpose of Ballard's expedition was not just to know where the subs were, but to know whether the Soviets had found them yet, and to know what condition they were in (so if the Soviets did find them, it would be known what knowlege might have been at risk).

  8. Re:Old News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    compared to how many still under the rule of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban?

  9. gee duh huh by Quadraginta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh yeah, because, you know, you shouldn't hide military objectives. They should be done right out in the open. Gentlemen don't read other gentlemens' mail. And all this hiding behind rocks and stuff when you're in a shooting war? Totally not cricket, old boy. You're supposed to just form ranks in your nice red uniforms and march out into the machine-gun fire, closing up ranks whenever someone takes a bullet.

    Sheesh.

    1. Re:gee duh huh by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about it? Not all wars are shooting wars, some are economic in nature (there were few shots fired during the Cold War, but I doubt anyone would claim there was no conflict). The world isn't some magical place where you're either 100% at war or 100% at peace.

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    2. Re:gee duh huh by dwye · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > (there were few shots fired during the Cold War

      Yeah, just a few in Korea, then a few in Vietnam, and a pittance in Afghanistan before the Soviets left. Almost no shots fired, at all.

      .sarc off

  10. Was Project Jennifer really a failure? by jamrock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The official report states that the K-129's forward section broke apart while being winched up by Glomar Explorer, but that two nuclear-tipped torpedoes and the remains of six crewmen were recovered (they were given a memorial service and buried at sea with military honors by the U.S. Navy). There have been whispers that the official story was disinformation for the Soviets' benefit, and that the mission was an unqualified success, recovering a ballistic missile and the real jackpot, the code books containing invaluable cryptographic information, including Soviet launch codes. Guess we'll know the full story in a few decades or so.

  11. Re:Project Jennifer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Though I am not religious, I was really touched by this service. In a time of extreme distrust and animosity, it's really great to see people treat their enemy as they'd like to be treated.

    I wish such an attitude was present today worldwide.

  12. Re:Royal Navy? by scatters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a helicopter pilot, Prince Andrew flew operational missions in the 1982 Falklands war. IIRC, his job was to make his helicopter a more attractive target than HMS Invincible to an Exocet missile. I think this also counts as putting his arse on the line.

    --
    A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.