'Extreme Programming' Controls Phoenix Mars Lander
pbd points out a story discussing the challenges faced by NASA engineers in designing the code sent to operate the Phoenix Mars Lander. Quoting Computerworld:
"On Wednesday, engineers sent up the code to run an actual analysis, but a satellite orbiting Mars, which transfers the data down to the Lander, was offline. Robinson explained that the satellite had been hit with radiation, knocking it into safe mode. 'Space is a harsh environment, and sometimes they just go into safe mode,' he noted. 'It's a minor problem. [The satellite] aborts whatever it was doing and waits for future commanding.' Engineers successfully resent the code on Thursday."
No that's an irresponsible risk with a lot of taxpayer money.
Then simply add some suspensefully dangerous music in the background and you have the next generation of thriller movies!
...whilst hand-coding a real-time, multitasking OS in assembler while suspended over a tank of water filled with hungry sharks. Laser beams optional.
I'm wondering what units they are using? American? SI? or Martian?
... but when I hear terms like "EXTREME PROGRAMMING!!!1eleven" I just roll my eyes and stop listening.
If the NASA staff is typical, then Wednesday is probably poker night for many. The games go on well past midnight, so they don't need to report to work the next day and have some robot 35 million miles being a problem.
Ezekiel 23:20
I hope they mean this type of Extreme Programming.
"A stable operating system running a mission critical device thousands of miles away..."
Just where the hell do you think Mars is??
I just hope none of it was LGPL 3.
I think that would mean that RMS owns Mars.
Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
Hey, after it gets larger than 10 basements, we lose the picture.
-The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
The 80's called. Something about not wearing out the word "awesome".
Google > NASA for directions
Mars is roughly 3715 miles from me, as the deepcrow flies.