Slashdot Mirror


Linux Cluster Supercomputer Performs Surgery on Dog

An anonymous reader writes "In April, the Lonestar supercomputer, a Dell Linux Cluster with 5,840 processors at the Texas Advanced Computing Center in Austin, performed laser surgery on a dog in Houston without the intervention of a surgeon. The article describes the process: 'The treatment itself is broken into four stages: 1) Lonestar instructs the laser to heat the domain with a non-damaging calibration pulse; 2) the thermal MRI acquires baseline images of the heating and cooling of the patient's tissue for model calibration; 3) Lonestar inputs this patient-specific information and recomputes the optimal power profile for the rest of the treatments; and 4) surgery begins, with remote visualizations and evolving predictions continuing throughout the procedure.'"

23 of 68 comments (clear)

  1. New Robot Overlords by backtick · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, how about bowing down before a cluster of those? Heheh. Mixing the memes, sorry...

  2. The dog died. by cduffy · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...and they bury that very far down in TFA. The question, of course, is whether that was the planned outcome; I'd like to see it answered a little more explicitly.

    If it is the intended outcome... well, so be it. If not, OTOH, that makes me a little less likely to sign up to be an early human test subject. :)

    1. Re:The dog died. by J'ai+Friedpork · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Second. I for one would like to know whether the dog died because of the treatment, in spite of it, or because they had to do an autopsy. Probably the latter, but the fact that they didn't specify it is a little worrying.

      --
      Took this comment seriously, did you?
    2. Re:The dog died. by crackp1pe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Linux killed a dog? It must have been using ReiserFS, I hear it's a killer file system.

    3. Re:The dog died. by Phyrexicaid · · Score: 2, Funny

      And then they installed Linux on it.

      --
      The meme is dead, long live the meme!
    4. Re:The dog died. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Lonestar may not be able to successfully perform surgery, but I hear it's pretty good at jamming Dark Helmet's radar.

    5. Re:The dog died. by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did they go for yellow dog or puppy?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    6. Re:The dog died. by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

      I doubt it was a volunteer.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:The dog died. by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look on the bright side: The cancer died too.

    8. Re:The dog died. by SUB7IME · · Score: 2, Informative

      In medical research using animals, the animal is traditionally sacrificed for the purpose of accessing the tissue, seeing the anatomy, and gaining a more complete understanding of what actually happened during the experiment.

    9. Re:The dog died. by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was in a EULA printed on the back of a doggy treat: 'By eating this buscuit, you agree to be bound and dissected by the terms of this agreement...'

  3. Awesome by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For the big dollars that surgeons pull down, they are after all performing mostly rote procedures for the most part. When you can replace a decade of training a person with a simple file copy to load software on to a robot, think of the savings that represents. Health care costs are a big drag on our standard of living in all other areas and it's only getting worse. Not to mention the millions who die around the world because they simply cannot afford the procedures. I'm by no means saying this technology is ready or that I'd be willing to go under the robo-knife at this point, but I'm sure glad they're working on it.

    1. Re:Awesome by Xtravar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We could get the savings now, without machines, if we lowered the bar to doing certain doctor-only actions and stopped artificially limiting the amount of doctors in the market.

      In some cases, they already are by allowing doctor's assistants and nurses' assistants the same powers. But I won't really consider it a success until I can go down the street and have eye surgery in Boris's basement, right next to where he makes the bootleg vodka.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    2. Re:Awesome by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of course replacing a surgeon with a reliable fully automated robot would be great.

      However your description of surgery is not correct. Surgery is difficult, minutious and different for ever patient. Great surgeons must be able to plan ahead, direct a team and control all the details of a surgery procedure as it happens, as well as improvising with a cool head for hours on end if things go wrong.

      It's the exact opposite of rote procedure. Especially now with recent advances in real-time non-invasive imaging and haptic instruments procedures change all the time.

    3. Re:Awesome by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 4, Funny

      How very appropriate, to have your sight both destroyed and restored by the same man's products!

      --
      If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  4. Re:Should have read... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

    Please tag "linuxkillsdogs". The dog died. If this were a Microsoft product, the dog would have lived. You open source freaks are just evil.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  5. Free software is the right tool for the job. by westbake · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Prostate cancer is the target of the research, so your comment is closer to reality than you might like.

    In this case, free software was the right tool. HPC with GNU/Linux is both flexible and mature. MD Anderson and everyone has better ways to spend their money than on software licenses for 5,000+ computers required to do this kind of work. Every kind of task will go this way eventually and most are already there. Whenever you start a task, you should look to see if some free program does not already do what you want.

    --
    I am a name troll of Westlake. Visit my homepage to learn why.
    1. Re:Free software is the right tool for the job. by willyhill · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That does not mean it's the only tool for the job. FOSS is not perfect, just like commercial software isn't always the best solution. Like in most areas, the cost of software licenses is minuscule compared to salaries, facilities, materials, etc; software is a tool regardless of whether money is charged for it or not.

      I'd rather have cancer cured than agendas furthered.

      --
      The twitter monologues. Click on my homepage and be amazed.
  6. Autodoc? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This sounds like one of the first steps in creating an autodoc from Larry Niven's books. Basically a box (coffin) you put someone in, close the lid and wait for it to fix them. It contains full life support, can perform surgery and produce (cloning?) it's own replacement parts.

    Of more immediate use, this sort of thing could be very useful for situations where surgeons are not available. Ships at sea, trips to Mars, NHS hospitals with long waiting lists...

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  7. Planning the surgery by DrYak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you can replace a decade of training a person with a simple file copy to load software on to a robot, think of the savings that represents. And who is going to plan the surgery ?
    A doctor who has gone medical training is still required. The only thing is after a long intellectually preparation part (reflection, selecting the route, specifying the region, everything else that needs to be planned by someone with lots of experience), the doctor can give the instruction to the robot and move to the next case.

    The price are going to go down. Not because you'll get rid of the doctors, but because the "planning" doctors we'll be able to handle more cases per day (and can all be grouped in specialised centres to handle the cases more efficiently)*, and then in the operating block, you'll only need to have one surgery team waiting in standby in case something goes wrong in one of the operations and needs to be finished by hand, as opposed to have one surgery team for every patient.

    *: the same kind of speed up we currently have thanks to modern radiology technology and electronic archives : it pretty cool. You sit the whole day in front of a console and the exams are constantly coming in, get looked at, you quickly dictate a report and jump to the next exam, while the previous one is subsequently transmitted to a supervisor who'll double check the result. Or you read /. when there isn't as much work....
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  8. Bad analogy by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jokes about killer file systems are like cars with missing passenger seats.

  9. It's not a Beowulf Cluster by russlar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this qualify as a Beowoof Cluster?

    --
    Anybody want my mod points?
  10. Re:The dog died. But he is a hero. by Skrapion · · Score: 2, Funny

    The surgery was done with lasers, not exploding batteries.

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.