Slashdot Mirror


Three ISPs Agree To Block Child Porn

Goobergunch and other readers sent in word that Sprint, Time Warner, and Verizon have agreed to block websites and newsgroups containing child pornography. The deal, brokered by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, occurred after Cuomo's office threatened the ISPs with fraud charges. It's of some concern that the blacklist of sites and newsgroups is to be maintained by the Center for Missing and Exploited Children, an NGO with no legal requirement for transparency. Here are two further cautions, the first from Lauren Weinstein: "Of broader interest perhaps is how much time will pass before 'other entities' demand that ISPs (attempt to) block access to other materials that one group or another feels subscribers should not be permitted to see or hear." And from Techdirt: "[T]he state of Pennsylvania tried to do pretty much the same thing, back in 2002, but focused on actually passing a law ... And, of course, a federal court tossed out the law as unconstitutional. The goal is certainly noble. Getting rid of child porn would be great — but having ISPs block access to an assigned list isn't going to do a damn thing towards that goal."

16 of 572 comments (clear)

  1. Child porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Right on the heals of a Boy scouts of America article.

    Hmmm

    1. Re:Child porn by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Next up on slashdot: Catholic Priests in America

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  2. Re:Are you sure? by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Yes, truecrypt.org DOES contain child porn, so does wikileaks.org"
    "Do you have proof?"
    "Why are you asking? You must be looking for child porn! STONE HIM!" There, fixed it for you.
    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  3. Easy.. by notdotcom.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    They hire a pedophile!!

    --
    Grandpa: My Homer is not a communist. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a communist, but he is not a porn star.
  4. Re:Let's go ahead and get this out of the way by CowboyNealOption · · Score: 5, Funny

    But the phone companies are forced to keep a list of numbers that are illegal to call (crack dealers and such) so people can't call them right?? Oh wait.....

  5. How the hell do you build this list? by y86 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great Idea in theory, "lets block all this bad stuff", OK now please define the rules...

    Government: It has to block child porn.
    Me: OK, how do we define child porn?
    Government: An adult and a child in sexual acts.
    Me: Right, how do we flag that to block it?
    Government: *frusterated* You block it!
    Me: We need to define a process or this won't work.
    Government: We'll make a list then.
    Me: So your going to scour the internets for child Porn and add it to this list. Nothing automatic?
    Government: Yes
    Me: So what venues will you block, HTTP, SSH, FTP, Torrent, MQ, Skype?
    Government: All of those things.
    Me: You can't decrypt HTTPS or SSH traffic, how do you know it's child porn?
    Government: Because we know those servers have porn since some guy flagged it.
    Me: You've heard of dynamic IP's right?
    Government: *MAD* DO WHAT WE SAY OR WE KILL THE BUNNY.
    Me: Um.... do it.

    1. Re:How the hell do you build this list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      i got some nude pics of the bunny, interested?

  6. Re:What's going to be the first false positive? by danzona · · Score: 3, Funny

    At last Cowboy Neal will win a poll!

  7. Re:Are you sure? by HappySmileMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was gonna put 4chan in my post but decided not to upset the hackers on steroids, since if I've learned anything from Fox news it's that everyone choosing to be anonymous on an imageboard are invariably out to destroy me.

  8. Re:Not that I read TFA, but... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    How will they do it? How can they detect kiddie porn? Because if they can do that at the packet level with 100% accuracy and 0% false positive, I wouldn't mind having this in my router at the hardware level.

    Are you kidding? I want this technology in my fucking camera phone. Then I can point it at a chick and find out if she's over 18 or not.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Re:Not that I read TFA, but... by HappySmileMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well obviously the ISPs and the state attorney are sick of looking at the same child porn images they have for years

  10. Re:Are you sure? by MilesAttacca · · Score: 2, Funny

    That news article is why I'm trading in my van for a Vespa. You can never be too safe!

    --
    98% of America's teens drink alcohol, smoke, and have sex. Put this in your sig if you like bagels.
  11. Re:Child porn is NOT the problem by ins0m · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's just say it: all the *chan boards.

    --
    Never attribute to Hanlon that which can be adequately attributed to Heinlein.
  12. Re:Child porn is NOT the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You've heard stories of people paying for porn on the internet? My god, what is wrong with this world?

  13. Re:Not that I read TFA, but... by kalirion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you kidding? I want this technology in my fucking camera phone. Then I can point it at a chick and find out if she's over 18 or not.

    18? That's way too inflexible.

    The phone should have a internationalization feature so that using GPS and an online database it will figure out the age of consent wherever you are, where you're from, and all the relevant laws.

  14. Re:Are you sure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    get a dog, and curtains

    and you should repaint that van of yours..