Slashdot Mirror


Ask Lt. Col. John Bircher About Cyber Warfare Concepts

The Air Force is not the only U.S. military branch trying to come to grips with the electronic side of warfare, both current and future. The U.S. Army Computer Network Operations (CNO)-Electronic Warfare (EW) Proponent (USACEWP), located at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas — home to the U.S. Army's Combined Arms Center — serves as the Army's hub for cyber-electronic concepts and capabilities. This is the organization responsible for developing doctrine, materiel and training to prepare the Army for cyber-electronic engagements. For example, USACEWP has developed training teams to ensure that U.S. commanders and soldiers around the world are fully informed of cyber-electronic capabilities at their disposal. Leading the Proponent's Futures branch is Lt. Col John "Chip" Bircher; Bircher entered the Army in 1989 as an Infantry officer, then served in various command and staff positions, most recently Information Operations (IO). He was the IO Chief for the 25th Infantry Division (Light), Hawaii, and Director of IO for Combined Joint Task Force -76, Bagram, Afghanistan. If you want to know more about the realities and challenges that face an armed, global IT department in a time when electronic warfare is ever more important and dangerous, now's your chance to ask Lt. Col. Bircher some questions. We'll pass on the highest-moderated questions for Lt. Col. Bircher to answer. Usual Slashdot interview rules apply.

9 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. John Bircher? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait a second. Aren't members of the John Birch Society called "John Birchers"? If so, I'd say this poor bastard has an unfortunate name.

    1. Re:John Bircher? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Funny

      His superior officer, Col. Kukla X. Clanner, wasn't available for comment.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  2. For us geeks who'd be sitting behind a computer .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    to fight. Will we have to go to basic training?

    If so, would basic training be to train us to stay up all night, living on pizza, soda, Skittles, and porn?

    If so, where do I sign up?!?

  3. Re:I would like to finally see people talking... by maxume · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just go down to your local Hippy Dippy Noodles.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  4. Re:Why so many directly connected networks at all? by Lev13than · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm interested in why so many sensitive networks are even hooked up to the internet in the first place, or why trivial systems are so often bundled with sensitive ones under the same security frameworks.

    Good point - I guess if the Internet had been designed by the military (or, say, by a military research group) it certainly wouldn't have ended up this way...

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
  5. Re:Attacks... by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Without diving into details that compromise security

    Can you imagine what might have happened, if you had not so qualified your question? He might have let the cat out of the bag!

    Personally, I would have phrased it this way: "Please tell us everything you're up to. (It's ok. We're cool.)"

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  6. Re:For us geeks who'd be sitting behind a computer by BadIdea · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jooooiiiiiiin uuuuusss. It's bliissssss.......

    --
    The Bad Idea Blog - Science, Skepticism, & Stupid
  7. Damn! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Funny

    And I wanted to know the fastest way to level up.

    --
    Deleted
  8. Re:China by legirons · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is the U.S. Army doing to protect U.S. sensitive information from the frequent number of cyber-attacks originating from inside the People's Republic of China? Buying and installing routers from there? ;)