Slashdot Mirror


UK's House of Lords Speaks To Voters Via YouTube, Blogs

PHPNerd writes "In a bold move to connect with the next generation of young British voters, the House of Lords has launched a YouTube video series that will detail what it does and make it more accessible to the younger generation. It accompanies an experimental blog in which various Lords write about political issues and can receive feedback from anyone around the world. The article quotes spokesman Owen Williams saying, 'We're trying to engage with younger people and people who may not be interested in politics. We looked at YouTube because it appeals to people outside the political elite.' Is this doomed to failure, or should more governments be doing something similar?"

9 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. House of Lords Rap by fyoder · · Score: 5, Funny

    'We're trying to engage with younger people and people who may not be interested in politics. Uh huh. And why would people not interested in politics tune into something about politics? Are they going to be rapping or something?

    We are the members of the House of Lords
    And what we're laying down won't make you bored.
    We debate the shit the House of Commons proposes,
    But we ain't no rubber stamp like some people might supposes.
    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  2. Tried it before by Triv · · Score: 4, Funny

    Connecting to them pesky youngsters has been tried before. It didn't turn out so well.

  3. Re:"We lie cheat and steal... " by MROD · · Score: 5, Informative

    For your information.... the House of Lords is not an elected body, it consists of members who have been given the priviledge (with a very few now who have inhereted it).

    Some might say that this is a problem because it's not representative. However, unlike an elected body it's free to make decisions on their merit without the worry of being popular. i.e. it doesn't have to pander to the current tabloid whims.

    Also, it has the advantage of having a large number of non-partisan members who aren't on the political party leash, many of which are experts in the fields of business, science and the law.

    The main purpose of the House of Lords these days is to put a brake on all those stupid, popularist, knee-jerk bills the current encumbent party tries to force through. Of course, they don't like this and are hence trying to "reform" the house and make it weaker.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  4. Re:"We lie cheat and steal... " by the_womble · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And now we need someone else to vote for us and validate us, otherwise we'll be shown for the rotten crooks we are, and people will stop wanting to partake of our poison fruit. The Lords do not need to win votes: they are appointed for life.

    They also tend to be rather better than the Commons in terms of serving the people (they have often voted against legislation that undermines civil liberties, for example), because they are far mroe independent from the executive.

  5. Will it succeed? Depends on the execution... by religious+freak · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they try to "make it cool" in an attempt to make it accessible, it will fail and be quite embarrassing (see HoL rap above!).

    If they make it accessible by speaking plainly, relating the issues to how they affect young people, Britain, and the world, it might have a shot at moderate success. (particularly if they show it in schools)

    In any event, if executed halfway decently, I believe they should be commended for trying, regardless of the outcome.

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  6. Re:Goodbye House of Lords by William+Ager · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The House that has in recent years so often tried to foil the plans of the government to erode the rights of citizens is a useless anachronism?

  7. The House of Lords by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Informative

    The great thing about being a non-elected lord is that you don't have to do and think vile things to get elected. Perhaps it's a sad fact, but true. Years ago, there was a police attack on a number of really quite harmless hippies in Wiltshire. Unfortunately a member of the Lords was passing by on his motorcycle, observed the whole thing and reported it to the Lords. The outcome was not pleasant for the police. I am quite sure that a local elected politician would not have rocked the boat in this way.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  8. Re:"We lie cheat and steal... " by Tim+C · · Score: 5, Informative

    They don't make the decisions, the House of Lords cannot create or pass laws. All they can do is approve or reject bills that are sent to them by the House of Commons. If they reject a bill, the Commons can modify it or not as they see fit and send it back again. A few years ago the Parliament Act was passed to give the government a means of forcing a bill through when the Lords repeatedly reject it, although I don't know the details of it.

    To be perfectly frank, at times the Lords is the only thing standing between us and yet another stupid, knee-jerk law that would do more harm than good. If you've been following UK news lately you'll have seen a number of instances of bad anti-terror laws being abused to do things including making sure families are in the right area for the school they want to send their children to to enforcing local rubbish disposal rules.

    Oh, and none of the Lords are self-appointed; some inherited their titles from their parents, while these days most are awarded them by the government.

  9. Re:"We lie cheat and steal... " by PeterBrett · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yes, silly us, why would we want a democracy, when a panel of experts can make all the decisions for us. No thanks, sir, I am from Czech republic, and we lived under such system for 40 years (the self-appointed body of "experts" being http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_of_Czechoslovakia).

    You've got to be a troll, because only a troll could deliberately misunderstand the way the British Parliamentary system works so badly. Where's my (-1, Wrong) moderation option?