Slashdot Mirror


42 of the Best Commercial Linux Games

LinuxLinks writes "It is true to say that the number of commercial games released for Linux each year remains small compared to other platforms. Nevertheless, we faced lots of difficult choices compiling a list of 42 of the best commercial Linux games. The selection we have finally chosen covers a wide range of different game genres, so hopefully there will be something here that will interest all."

53 of 158 comments (clear)

  1. Yep by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And all five people who bought them greatly enjoy them. So do the other hundred thousand or so who downloaded them via torrent because 'all software should be free', further throttling Linux game development.

    1. Re:Yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I guess most Windows and Mac users must believe the same thing!

    2. Re:Yep by poetmatt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because all 5 people include the thousands that all play Eve, right?

    3. Re:Yep by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think there's a small problem of distribution. Linux-only games won't sell. However, Windows games do sell, and if there's Linux binaries available, all the better.

      Of the games on the list, I have NWN, Quake 3, 4 and Doom 3... NWN, Doom 3 and Q4 on the virtue of buying the Windows version and downloading the free binary, Q3A because luckily there actually was a local book shop that had Linux games (I also bought Myth II from them, and ordered SMAC from another store). Loki was a great company, too bad they didn't quite have the distribution figured out to the same extent as other game companies.

      Currently, I don't see many other viable modes of distribution for Linux games other than either a) Sell Windows games and let people download Linux binaries on their own or b) supply Linux binaries inconspicuously on the CD. Linux-only packages are murder.

    4. Re:Yep by Teppy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I designed (and run) A Tale in the Desert, one of the games on the list. About 3.1% of paid players currently use Linux. Also, 7.3% use OSX, and the rest use Windows.

      Of all trial accounts, 7.3% of Linux users go on to pay for at least one month of the game. Of OSX users, it's 6.9%, and of Windows users it's 11.8%.

      For some reason the Linux number has dropped significantly over the years (used to be around 10% IIRC), though the other two numbers have remained about the same.

    5. Re:Yep by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell, ship it with a Live DVD version so people don't have to switch right away.

      IMHO that would be a "killer app" for Linux. Develop a game using OpenGL and other libraries and then create a live-CD which only starts the game (and all the underlying hardware is done by Linux).
      That way PC gaming can be made as simple as console gaming. The only downside I see is the lack of upgrades when doing that... other thing you could do is ask to install in some of the available partitions. And let the people play *only* when inserting the disk (that way you can implement insert-CD-annoyance-security.

      I don't know however if Linux would be good for that (given the licenses), maybe a BSD based live disk would be better...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    6. Re:Yep by billcopc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If that's your killer app, you'll only end up killing the platform.

      I wouldn't play a single-boot game. I haven't done that since the DOS days, and even back then I found it highly annoying. I have this ridiculously overpowered PC for a reason, and I very much enjoy firing up any random game in a few seconds, play however long I want, and quit back to the desktop so I can resume productivity. I often alt-tab out of games to poke at something else, or look up a game guide on the web.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    7. Re:Yep by westlake · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I guess most Windows and Mac users must believe the same thing!

      But enough are willing to pay to make PC gaming a billion dollar industry.

      The developer for Linux begins with the handicap of a 0.68% market share -- in a world where Vista has 15%, OSX on the Mac and the iPhone 8%.

      Operating System Market Share

      When your potential market is already microscopic, you can't afford to lose a significant percentage of sales to the pirate.

    8. Re:Yep by westlake · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Windows users don't have the same organization, at least, not around Windows.

      That doesn't feel quite right.

      You only have to look at CNET and Download.com to see that there are communities built around Windows. A $20 shareware product like SolSuite Solitaire rates an editorial review, a video, and 9 million downloads.

    9. Re:Yep by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Hmmmm, having used Linux for a good number of years now, I still have problems deciding which software to use, eg. cd burning - i know there are a few K3b, gnomebaker, brassero, xcdroast, cdrtools, nero, etc, but I think it would be quite neat if there was a central place like cnet.com, download,com where these another linux softwares could be put up like that .

      Is there anything like that for linux?

      I'm reminded of the debian software popularity contest package, and I usually tick the box to submit the info - where can I find out the results of all this data collection?

    10. Re:Yep by kripkenstein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But enough [Windows and Mac users] are willing to pay to make PC gaming a billion dollar industry. If you design a game for both PCs and Macs, then adding Linux as a third platform shouldn't be that hard, since hopefully you're already writing using a cross-platform toolkit (in fact I am in the process of doing so myself). Note that if you're not doing so, but rather writing specifically for PCs and specifically for Macs, then you're already wasting a lot of effort over what it would take to use a cross-platform toolkit from the beginning.

      So the main reason not to support Linux is if you are PC-only, which is making less and less sense with Apple's rising success.

      A further issue is that of consoles. In fact PC (/Mac) gaming is somewhat declining in comparison to consoles, where game publishers make much more money. So it makes sense to write your game in a manner that allows it to be ported to the three major consoles (even if you don't intend to do so immediately, it makes sense to keep your options open, which they are not if you write something very specific to Windows and DirectX). So if you make room for such future portability, you should be using a cross-platform toolkit, hence again adding Linux support shouldn't be too hard.
    11. Re:Yep by ardor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, its not as easy.

      First, adding Linux means adding TONS of work for support. Linux distros are much less static than Windows or OSX - the platform can vary greatly. This makes support very hard, this is why id and Epic do not give support for their ports.

      Also, OSX and Linux have many subtle differences which might catch you off-guard. Expect lots of testing and debugging.

      When we move to consoles its a different story altogether. Forget about one cross-platform toolkit, the platforms are too diverse. If you want to exploit the raw power of, say, the PS3, you NEED to do a real port. Write the code as modular as possible, but expect rewrites. Forget about using the SDL on the PS3, for instance, or OpenGL - if you want full power, you program the chipset directly. Also, a cross-platform toolkit ends up consuming resources, something you often cannot afford (a good example is the PS2 with its lousy 32MB RAM). In short, a simple cross-compile won't do the trick, unfortunately.

      --
      This sig does not contain any SCO code.
    12. Re:Yep by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you design a game for both PCs and Macs, then adding Linux as a third platform shouldn't be that hard, since hopefully you're already writing using a cross-platform toolkit

      The second platform for the Windows developer is the XBox 360 - and the cross-platform toolkit is sitting there in front of him

      The Mac port can be outsourced.

      The OEM Linux PC is typically presented as an entry-level system with bottom feeder specs.

      The games in the CNR repository make that plain enough.

      It's the rare Linux developer who competes directly against the Sims or Bioshock on the PC.

      He's far more likely to be producing content that wouldn't look out of place on Shockwave.com or the download arcade on the console.

      XBox Live!

  2. I knew it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The ultimate question:

    How many commercial games can you play on Linux?

    1. Re:I knew it! by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many commercial games can you play on Linux?

      A lot. Many require WINE or similar to run though. In fact though with a VM you could say you can run every single commercial game in existence on Linux. Just because a game doesn't run natively on Linux doesn't mean that you can't play it using WINE, and many of the more prominent games even have specific steps to play the game perfectly or better then on Windows.
      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:I knew it! by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but AFAIK there is no VM that allows native access to the graphics card.
      All the VMs I worked with (Virtual PC, VMWare and QEMU in the past, VirtualBox today) emulate a card on par with an S3 Trident or some other limited card.
      You can change the video memory size (and remember that this means regular memory speeds! no GDDR3!) but no pixel shaders and other "modern" technologies.

  3. EVE doesn't require Wine? by Lane.exe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't know EVE Online had a native client. Hm.

    --
    IAALS.
    1. Re:EVE doesn't require Wine? by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong.
      http://www.eve-online.com/download/linux.asp
      They provide .rpm, .deb and .tgz downloads.
      Technically it's built with Transgaming's "cider" windows api for linux (based on wine).

    2. Re:EVE doesn't require Wine? by spir0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      double wrong. kinda.

      the native linux program is a downloader of the Windows Application, and an installer of cider/cedega/whatever it's called.

      given TFA's requirement of "Not require Wine to run" this would have to be a fail.

      Eve Online is a Windows program requiring Wine or derivative to run. Technically, they could list the Eve INSTALLER on their list, but that's not a game.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
  4. Better idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    List the best free games. We're all well aware of the proprietary ones.

  5. How many... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...were released in the last year? Last two years? Three?

    1. Re:How many... by Cheapy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Enemy Territory: Quake Wars was released last year. So there's at least one. Amazingly fun game too!

      --
      Would you kindly mod me +1 insightful?
  6. The only 42 Commercial Linux Games by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    42? why not 43? or how about 50? because there are only 42 commercial linux games

    1. Re:The only 42 Commercial Linux Games by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought it was 'How many roads must a man walk down?'

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:The only 42 Commercial Linux Games by cp.tar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd have revoked his geek card, but Anonymous Cowards don't have them anyway.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
  7. Crappy list by Silverlancer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They include games with no real native client (EVE Online, which has a built-in Cedega-like engine), but they don't list The Ur-Quan Masters, possibly the best native-Linux game in history? Given how small their "Adventure" category is, they would have done well to include it...

  8. Douglas Adams. by DrYak · · Score: 5, Funny

    42? why not 43? or how about 50? There is a theory which states that if you ever discovers exactly why it is 42, the Life, Universe And Everything will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  9. Re:The Best 42? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    no, but 42 is the answer.

  10. Alpha Centauri... by headkase · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would have nominated Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri but that one broke many a kernal ago on a glibc update. Too bad Loki is dead or they could have updated it.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Alpha Centauri... by WWWWolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would have nominated Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri but that one broke many a kernal ago on a glibc update. Too bad Loki is dead or they could have updated it.

      Funny, I actually got SMAC to work on a reasonably new setup; the updater blew up (I had to patch the game manually by extracting the update and patching the files individually with xdelta), fullscreen mode doesn't work (weird video mode), and apparently I'd need to disable compositing to make it not crash when the actual game play begins, which I'm too lazy to do...

      We needs a new build or at least a competent clone! SMAC rules!

    2. Re:Alpha Centauri... by MK_CSGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I actually returned to Alpha Centauri yesterday and played many hours in the weekend (though back in the day I bought the Windows version and I now play it on VirtualBox).
      This game surely enters my best 3 games ever list, maybe even the 1st.
      This game has the optimal mixture of reasonable graphics, great design, great story, many options and great "feeling".
      Seriously, every time I return to it the game just blows my mind away,

    3. Re:Alpha Centauri... by turgid · · Score: 3, Funny

      I actually returned to Alpha Centauri yesterday

      Can I see your engine? How does it work? Is it a Wankel warp engine?

    4. Re:Alpha Centauri... by phantomlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm running:
      $ uname -a
      Linux death 2.6.25-gentoo-r4 #2 SMP Thu May 22 15:42:34 EDT 2008 x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ AuthenticAMD GNU/Linux

      SMAC and SMACX work fine here if you download the libraries and follow the instructions at http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Running_Old_Loki_Games

      I run it via a slightly different command than what they give there though
      LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/lib/Loki_Compat/" /usr/lib/Loki_Compat/ld-linux.so.2 /usr/local/games/smac/smacx.dynamic

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
    5. Re:Alpha Centauri... by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would have nominated Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri but that one broke many a kernal ago on a glibc update. Too bad Loki is dead or they could have updated it.

      On a related note, the other day I was really wishing I had purchased the combo pack (SMAC + SMACX) for Linux which was selling several years back. I was checking on Amazon, and apparently nowadays a used copy of SMACX goes for ~$110, with $150 minimum for a new copy.

  11. Games selection by DrYak · · Score: 4, Informative

    They include games with no real native client (EVE Online, which has a built-in Cedega-like engine) Nevertheless, EVE Online is sold and supported specifically for Linux. They just happen to have chosen a different strategy - instead of paying someone like icculus to write a port, they keep the same code base and pay people at transgaming to make sure that this code runs on linux.
    It is a commercial effort, by a commercial company to be sure that their product can be used on a Linux desktop. It fits the list.

    (same story for Mac too, btw)

    , but they don't list The Ur-Quan Masters, possibly the best native-Linux game in history? Ur Quan is really a great game. *BUT* it an open-source project hosted on sourceforge. The whole point of the article was to point out effort from corporation making efforts in order to have their commercial product run on Linux too.
    Ur Quan however great doesn't fit into *that* criterion.

    Given how small their "Adventure" category is, they would have done well to include it... Their "Adventure" category seems to have only survival-horror kind of game. They have actual classical adventure games (in the point'n'click sense of the word) - the "ankh" serie - but those are sorted together with the RPGs.
    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Games selection by analog_line · · Score: 2, Informative

      EVE Online may be "supported" for Linux, but it's terrible support. I resubscribed to EVE Online because of the Linux and Mac clients, and I had nothing but problems, and stopped the subscription after two months. Less than half the frame rate of the Windows version on the same hardware, and the Mac client was even worse.

    2. Re:Games selection by rsmith-mac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto to this. Cider does a piss poor job of supporting EVE, when the "native" clients first shipped it was slow, crash happy, and prone to graphical corruption. Even today it's slow and prone to graphical corruption, it's just less crash happy. Meanwhile Windows users get to use EVE's "premium" graphics, a series of new models and lighting system requiring Shader Model 3 while Linux and Mac users are out of luck. The situation is so bad that the remaining Linux users have gone back to playing the regular client on WINE because it's faster and supports said premium graphics, Mac users are out of luck because DarWINE isn't quite up to speed with SM3.

      It works only if your definition is "it executes" otherwise you're much better off playing it under Windows.

  12. Difficult choices by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 4, Funny

    we faced lots of difficult choices compiling a list of 42 of the best commercial Linux games.

    Foremost among these difficulties was finding 42 commercial Linux games.

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  13. DEFCON FTW by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not familiar with many of the games on that list; but DEFCON is a game very worthy of attention. Minimalist vector graphics, ripped straight from the Big Display in every movie version of a NATO command center, minimal; but haunting, sound effects, and a disconcerting premise. That game is tougher on the nerves than anything I've played since System Shock 2. Which is pretty impressive for a third person strategy game.

  14. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  15. Lesser Known Linux Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wrote up a short review with screenshots for several fun lesser known Linux games that didn't all make the top 42 list:
    http://www.linuxgames.com/archives/10260

  16. As said allready: The list isn't very good. by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Eve Online has no native client. IIRC it has Cedegar tied in. So it breaks their own rules. Sort of.

    Kohan has a pure native version *and* a version that comes autobundled with it's own Wine/Cedegar offering instant one-click install and play and it isn't even mentioned.

    Where is Tribes 2?
    What about Rune or Heavy Metal?

    The last time I tested Wurm Online (given, that was a while ago) it was crappy. I mean, really crappy.

    I'm glad they mentioned Savage/Savage 2 though. The S2Games people deserve credit for a wonderfull game that runs natively on Linux since day one and was the first quality title that actually actively advertised their support for Linux.

    But some of the games on this list are far outperformed by todays FOSS counterparts. The only indie game that I didn't know of and got me curious was "H-Craft Championship". Gotta check that out.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  17. I'd just like to take a moment... by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...to testify on behalf of "Darwinia." Beautiful, moody, atmospheric, and emotionally engaging. Oh, it's also dirt cheap and a bargain at twice the price. Lovely, glowy, primitive "TRON"-esque graphics, swirly sounds, and easy to learn.

    This is one developer that's definitely worth your time and few dollars. Skip the Starbucks for a day and try it out. Even though it's a linear-ish game, there's still replay value. Went all the way through it four or five times now and it's never the same twice.

  18. Shogo and SiN? by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm surprised that Shogo at least didn't make the list. I rather liked that game back when I was messing with the beta. =)

  19. Well, sorta by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    VMWare has some limited 3D support you can enable in version 6. It isn't that complete, but 3DMark 2001 does run and gets a respectable score, for older hardware. VMWare 6.5 has much more complete 3D support. It is still in beta and I've not tried it (I use VMWare in a production environment) but I've no reason to believe they are lying. It claims to be DX8, more or less, as in Pixel shaders up to v2.0 and actually makes use of the hardware in your system.

    You are still going to get slowdown, of course, but I imagine they may make it workable. When it goes final, I'll get the upgrade and see what happens.

  20. VMWare Workstation 6.5, currently in Beta by redstar427 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am testing out the beta version of VMWare Workstation 6.5

    This version does still buffer the video card, but it seems on par with DirectX 9.x and pixel Shader 2.0

    I started testing with older games so far, such as Diablo II, which work fine. Soon I will try newer games. However, since it does not yet report the actual physical video card, some games will not work with it.

    This is improved greatly over the past version, for use with Direct3D games.

    Also, it seems WINE has improved greatly as well.

    However, if you like to play power 3D games, then native Windows is probably the best choice for most games.

    --
    "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe." Albert Einstein
  21. RTCW? by antdude · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  22. No Descent 3? by Jeff250 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No game is without its flaws, but Descent 3 delivered a unique gameplay experience for Linux and other operating systems:
    http://www.lokigames.com/products/descent3/
    It deserves mention in the list, perhaps in lieu of one of the more ordinary first person shooters listed.

  23. Vendetta Online by Incarnate-VO · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I designed and run Vendetta Online (vendetta-online.com), another game on the above list. I don't have the cool realtime stats that Teppy does, but we have quite a few Linux people and a significant OS X population (around 30-40% of our userbase, last I checked). Our game is completely native on each platform, and includes a 64bit Linux client. We don't use any kind of portability/wrapper libraries.

    1. Re:Vendetta Online by Vskye · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I play Vendetta and it rocks. I've been playing since Nov 2007 and it really is a cool game, and I'm running it under Ubuntu 8.04 with the 64-bit linux client. You get something like 8 hours of free time to play online to see if you like it enough to subscribe. (just a happy gamer, not associated with VO) Oh, one more thing.. take the training missions first before you start asking silly questions. ;)

      --
      Life was hell, then I discovered Linux...
  24. Technically, yes by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, technically, yes, there have been more games ported to Linux, back in the Loki Games days. Stuff like IIRC Call To Power or Railroad Tycoon (IIRC) 2. Well, those are the two I actually own. There probably are a few more.

    That said, do note that the list is already containing some... rather... "classic" ones. Gorky 17, for example is a 1999 games for example, so it's rapidly approaching a decade old. So is Creatures 3. Knights and Merchants is from 1998. (And even back then it was a crap game, with some of the worst pathfinding (among other sins) I've seen in a RTS. And not very popular either. So it's... unsettling to see that as one of the best games for Linux.)

    Quake 3 was a good game, back then, but it's from 1999 too. Ok, they have Quake 3 Arena there, which is from 2000.

    Don't get me wrong, there's newer stuff in that list too, and some good stuff too. But, nevertheless, it's basically 42 games spread across 10 bloody years. Yeah, so some would be closer to one end than others, but that doesn't invalidate the point much. You're probably better off trying to use Wine than waiting for those commercial Linux games to trickle in.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  25. Ankh 2 under Role Play? by Nahooda · · Score: 2, Informative

    Huh? They listed Ankh 2 under Role Play but it's a classic adventure.

    By the way, if you'd like to support the development of commercial Linux games you should consider pre-ordering Jack Keane at ixsoft.de. If 200 pre-orders are reached the game will be ported to Linux. It's from the same company that's responsible for the wonderful Ankh series of which the first to games are already available for Linux.

    -nahooda

    --
    Sigs suck!
  26. s/commercial/proprietary/g by skeeto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope I am not being overly pedantic here, but there is nothing non-commercial about the GPL or any other free software licenses. In fact, you can pay money for Free softare games if you like. What they really mean is proprietary. In the article, they do however have a clearer definition,

    To be eligible for inclusion in this list each game needed to be:

    • Released under a proprietary license with a fee required either to purchase the game, or a monthly charge
    • Not require Wine to run. Wine is a compatibility layer for running Windows software

    My only complaint is with the title of the article.