Slashdot Mirror


Geohashing Meets an Angry Rancher With Firearms

katicli writes "Geohashing, an obscure xkcd pastime which involves going to random coordinates generated by md5 hashing, the date, and the opening status of the stock market, appears to have just gotten far more interesting. The official wiki reports a warning for other geohashers intending to go to the spot designated for June 14th in the San Francisco area, as several avid fans of xkcd were met by an angry rancher and firearms."

4 of 800 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Overreactions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In free countries you can. It's one of the fundamental rights, like privacy, free speech and water. The right to roam.

  2. Re:Overreactions by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the amount of FPSism that abounds in certain sectors of the geek community, you'd think that they'd be desensitized to guns by now. FPSes tell me that headshots are easy, and that all it takes is a moment of not listening for footsteps, or a moment's hesitation with my own gun, and I'm dead. And here I am without even a knife... You'd think FPSes would make geeks even more sensitive to guns.

    They're just there for a math joke, but for all he knows they're trying to set up the next woodstock. I somehow doubt woodstock would be his biggest fear. For that matter, if that's what they're doing, seems like a perfect opportunity to cash in on his previously-undervalued property.
    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  3. Re:Overreactions by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a difference between carrying a firearm and having one available in the truck. It doesn't even have to be visible, it might be in a gun case or sleeve for protection behind the seats. My grandfather, who traps, keeps a .22 revolver under his seat most of the time. For a rancher or farmer, a firearm is a tool, and often thought of about as much as a cordless drill.

    There's enough gun weenies out there that it's often not worth the hassle if somebody panics when you're in town.

    All this discounts concealed carry. Not to mention that they might have been carrying and you simply didn't realize it. I'm part of the firearms community that concerns itself with self defense. This includes both concealed and unconcealed carry. People who carry unconcealed have reported that an amazing amount of people never realize that they're carrying.

    We're not normally talking about a chrome plated six shooter in a tooled leather harness with silver highlights, here. We're talking a flat black firearm in a black leather or synthetic holster. If they're carrying one of the smaller ones, perhaps with a shirt bloused a bit over the top, it can easily be mistaken for a blackberry or other such device.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  4. Re:Overreactions by Kidbro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not arguing against you, but this long discussion about trespassing made me want to post about Allemansrätten (Swedish, lit. transl: everyman's right). It is pretty much legal to enter private property as long as you stay out of gardens and the absolute vicinity of houses (just a clarification, as English is not my native language; when I say "property" here I speak about land, not houses). Essentially the law (which is a part of the Swedish constitution) exists in order to ensure that people will always have access to the country's forests, fields and lakes.

    In short, barring special circumstances or special permits, it is illegal for the owner to drive anybody off their property.

    I'm certainly not saying you're wrong - I just thought that people may want to know that alternative views on the concept of private property exists, and just picked one of the first posts in the discussion about it to reply to.
    Oh, and Sweden is not the only country that has this practice. The law exists in other Nordic countries, and to a lesser extent some other European countries.