Complete Nvidia GTX280 Scores Posted

Groo Wanderer writes "Since boredom is a dangerous thing on the weekends, I decided to alleviate mine by running 233 benchmarks on the new GT280. This includes 28 gaming related tests across up to nine resolutions, and 9800GTX numbers thrown in for good measure. Since there were no NDAs involved in getting you these numbers, we are not bound by the pesky NDA that lifts tomorrow. You can read all of the numbers here; enjoy."

Comments

Re:Great

[Kjella]

All this tells us is that the previous generation of cards are still ahead of the cpu. When you see cards with similar framerates for lower resolutions and then they diverge at higher res, it tells you that it is the processor limiting the framerate at those resolutions. if by "those", you mean the lower resolutions, but I have to ask at what framerates? At low resolutions at 200fps both CPU and GPU is way ahead of the game and are overkill in any case. At the framerates that matter, most games are still GPU bound. I guess it's where you're starting at, I got a nice 1920x1200 widescreen monitor and it's definately the GPU keeping me back. With antialiasing I'm looking at 35-140% improvement here, with an average of maybe 60%. I'd say that's pretty impressive.

Re:Slashdot: Keeping your wallet full since 1998.

[Fweeky]

Read the start:

WE HAVE BEEN dogging Nvidia's new chip for a while for being too big, too hot, too slow, and unmanufacturable. It is all of that, and you will know why we said that in a few weeks. For example:

Word has come out of Satan Clara that the yields are laughable. No, make that abysmal, they are 40 per cent. To add insult to injury, that 40 per cent includes both the 280 and the 260 yield salvage parts. With about 100 die candidates per wafer, that means 40 good dice per wafer. Doing the maths, a TSMC 300mm 65nm wafer runs about $5000, so that means each good die costs $125 before packaging, testing and the like. ...

To add insult to injury, the TDPs of the 260 and 280 are 182W and 236W respectively. This means big copper heatsinks, possibly heatpipes, and high-end fans. ...

The GT200 is about six months late, blew out their die size estimates and missed clock targets by a lot. ATI didn't. This means that buying a GT260 board will cost about 50 per cent more than an R770 for equivalent performance. The GT280 will be about 25 per cent faster but cost more than twice as much. A month or so after the 770 comes the 700, basically two 770s on a slab. This will crush the GT280 in just about every conceivable benchmark and likely cost less. 236W TDP! I have a 30" display, so good performance at very high resolutions is important to me, but.. I think I'll pass if the GPU alone is going to draw more power than my entire system.

Re:i see one little thing

[Quarters]

Currently the released nVidia drivers don't support the 2xx series and the beta drivers that do support the 2xx series don't have .inf file entries for anything but the 2xx series. Until unified drivers are released that support and install on the entire nVidia product line it will be problematic to produce comparisons with the same drivers.

Re:Slashdot: Keeping your wallet full since 1998.

[kesuki]

I keep wondering why people buy 30" computer monitors... is there something wrong with a 1080p 46" TV set? they sell DVD to hdmi cables, and many sets have a PC input.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824001098 $1,299 = 30"

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16889234003 $1,199 = 47"

that particular set has a PC connection, 2 dvi ports and 1 hdmi, and here's the kicker, the difference in response time? .5 ms the Samsung has 6ms the Westinghouse has 6.5ms

i've heard before that Westinghouse displays are basically big PC monitors, with a TV tuner attached.

now i know, a HDTV generally only supports 1080p, 1080i, 720p, and 480i on the HD inputs, and since this one has PC inputs on the pc input it accepts 1920 x 1080, 640 x 480, 800 x 600, 1024 x 768 on the PC input... finding a RGB PC cable is easy, i used to specifically pick out PC monitors with replaceable cables, in case the cable got cut/kinked or the end pins broken.. so i already have cables from old monitors!

is it really worth it to support 2560x1600 resolution? especially since modern (single card setups) gaming cards can't even handle 1080p on modern game engines.. and even with multi card support, the CPU winds up being a limiting factor... OCing to 4 ghz with some extreme cooling solution, like the xp-120 or water cooling... is probably the only way to really push frame rates, even with a SLI/crossfire solution.

Re:Slashdot: Keeping your wallet full since 1998.

[Fweeky]

I keep wondering why people buy 30" computer monitors... is there something wrong with a 1080p 46" TV set? Erm, yeah, plenty; first, it's huge. 30" is marginal for a monitor you want to fit on a desk and sit 25" away from, 46" is going to be stupid.

Second, the TV set has a crappy resolution for its size; 1920×1080? If I wanted that resolution I'd get a 24" monitor (or two) which is at least going to have a sensible DPI for, well, a monitor.

here's the kicker, the difference in response time? .5 ms the Samsung has 6ms the Westinghouse has 6.5ms Haha, right, a mere .5ms difference in dubious response time measurements sure does make for a kicker; I can't even tell the difference between my 16ms 20"'s and my 8ms 30". Never mind the Samsung has twice the resolution and a 36% wider colour range, that response time is critical! ;)

is it really worth it to support 2560x1600 resolution? especially since modern (single card setups) gaming cards can't even handle 1080p on modern game engines Sorry, that's bullshit. I have a single 8800GTS 512 and a 2.6GHz Opteron 185, and most games play fine at 2560*1600. I use it for 1080p from the PS3 too, and that looks great, so you don't necessarily need to run in native resolution; you benefit from the size, and when you can manage it you benefit from the resolution.

And what makes you think games were my primary motivation for it? It's a computer, I do work on it, and that resolution gives me space to run a browser side by side with editors, file browsers, half a dozen terminals, TV guides and media players. With the addition of one of my old 20"'s, it's like having 3 monitors.