Slashdot Mirror


A 30-Picowatt Processor For Sensors

Roland Piquepaille writes "University of Michigan (U-M) researchers have developed an ultra low power microchip which 'uses 30,000 times less power in sleep mode and 10 times less in active mode than comparable chips now on the market.' It only consumes 30 picowatts in sleep mode, which means that a simple watch battery could power the chip for more than 200 years. Of course, this is not a processor for your next computer. It is designed for sensor-based devices such as medical implants, environment monitors or surveillance equipment. However, the design is very clever." Roland's blog has some more information, including a die picture of the chip, known as the Phoenix.

4 of 93 comments (clear)

  1. A 30-Picowatt Roland for Black Men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Dear Roland,

    Fuck off and die.

    We don't want you and your stupid fucking blog posted all over our precious website. We are not here to make you money with clickthroughs, we are here to read news for nerds and stuff that matters. Your websites persistent watering down of topics in the name of AdSense points is sickening, stupid and plagaristic, and I hope your wife gives you AIDS after sucking a big black cock.

    Sincerely,

    Every Slashdotter.

  2. Re:Watch batteries don't last 263 years... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The wearer won't last 263 years either. Total washout.

  3. Re:my thoughts on roland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wait, I don't get it. What does this have to do with Roland? Are you saying he's the eater, the guy, or the pile of shit?

  4. Re:Watch batteries don't last 263 years... by hvm2hvm · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What's wrong with you? It's just an analogy to make us realize just how little power that chip uses. Most people know batteries don't last very long. Posting some battery types and giving information about how much they last isn't going to show people you are smart, just that you are trying to get a +insightful or +informative for some obvious non-important bullshit. Why do people have to pick on all these details and criticize every other word someone says in here? (like I do now)

    --
    ics