Slashdot Mirror


IP Traffic To 'Double' Every Two Years

Stony Stevenson writes "Web traffic volumes will almost double every two years from 2007 to 2012, driven by video and web 2.0 applications, according to a report from Cisco Systems. Cisco's Visual Networking Index (PDF) predicts that visual networking will account for 90 percent of the traffic coursing through the world's IP networks by 2012. The upward trend is not only driven by consumer demand for YouTube clips and IPTV, according to the report, as business use of video conferencing will grow at 35 percent CAGR over the same period." I left the apostrophes around the word "double" in the title because the linked site has them, but for the life of me I can't figure out why.

30 of 128 comments (clear)

  1. 'double' by Swizec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How do they even define what a double of IP traffic is? Double the amount of packets? Double the amount of connections? Double the amount of IP's used in traversal from one point to another?

    1. Re:'double' by martyb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Said the parent post:

      How do they even define what a double of IP traffic is?

      They predicted the amount of traffic in petabytes per month.

      Said the original post:

      I left the apostrophes around the word 'double' in the title because the linked site has them, but for the life of me I can't figure out why.

      TFA contains a link to Cisco's Visual Networking Index (PDF)

      Look on page 3 of that PDF, where there is "Table 1. Global IP Traffic 2006-2012".

      A quick scan of the values do show a doubling of volume looking 2 years out from any given year... but there are exceptions to that. The comparison of traffic from 2010 to 2012 mostly does not show a doubling, AND, in a couple places, the data comparing 2009 to 2011 does not double, either.

      Lastly, the final row of that table predicts "Total IP traffic (PB per month)":

      • 2006: 4,234
      • 2007: 6,577
      • 2008: 10,747
      • 2009: 16,296
      • 2010: 24,228
      • 2011: 32,983
      • 2012: 43,518

      Twice the volume of 2010, i.e. 24,228 would be 48,456 which is less than 43,518. So, though not quite doubled in one case listed there, to say that it would double every two years would be incorrect. And we'd be all over that if they had claimed it to be. IMHO, to say 'double' is a reasonable way to express this concept.

    2. Re:'double' by postbigbang · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although I'll not argue the data, it seems a bit self-serving to make a prediction like this. There are argument offsets to this data that might be salient:

      1) video, especially HDTV, is being delivered by cable systems out-of-band of the Internet because of its high data rate. This trend will continue, else cable companies will have to evolve (and rapidly) immensely fast infrastructure that must also match CPE. Unlikely to occur. However, DSL providers are faced with a similar problem. What this means is that HDTV will be switched at the head-end eventually, and not 100% available to CPE. Video on Demand will become the rule of the day, thus offsetting some of the perceived growth in Cisco's numbers

      2) business video conferencing, even in the face of $4 or $8/gal costs, just hasn't taken off. Codecs are available that can do a very good job of offsetting bandwidth needs.

      3) isochronous media is still a bear, but it simply needs priority and priority in the face of network neutrality calls will be difficult without increasing bandwidth and therefore asset costs, which pays/plays into Cisco's hands mightily (are you watching, Wall Street?).

      4) Cellular/mobile growth will climb, but it's more linear in growth and devices that receive entertainment content that uses bandwidth are largely distributed on private, rather than the public Interent. You just can't make a mobile phone in to an HDTV no matter how much you try, and the demand for it isn't there despite the best hopes of the telcos.

      5) regionalization of content distribution is already occuring, and so a distributed infrastructure will 'cellularize' a lot of transfers. Transasction-focused systems aren't well managed through regionalization, but because entertainment systems aren't usually transaction-based, the use case is largely moot.

      Doubling is therefore a projection based on a lot of assumptions, mostly favoring the maker of the study.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    3. Re:'double' by Kingrames · · Score: 5, Funny

      "would be 48,456 which is less than 43,518. "

      want to help me with my math homework?

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    4. Re:'double' by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 3, Funny

      They predicted the amount of traffic in petabytes per month.
      I'm confused. Could you express that in the more commonly accepted unit of measurement: Libraries of Congress? Thanks...
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    5. Re:'double' by Bandman · · Score: 4, Funny

      The worst part of that analogy is that the LoC is constantly growing.

      For long term proposals, you'd need to do inflation-adjusted Libraries of Congress.

    6. Re:'double' by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Funny

      Twice the volume of 2010, i.e. 24,228 would be 48,456 which is less than 43,518. So, though not quite doubled in one case listed there, to say that it would double every two years would be incorrect. And we'd be all over that if they had claimed it to be. IMHO, to say 'double' is a reasonable way to express this concept.

      Twice the volume of 2010 is 4020...

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    7. Re:'double' by murraj2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Double ain't what it used to be, that's why I've moved on to BigDecimal.

  2. Duh by kmsigel · · Score: 5, Funny

    I really thought traffic would level off, and maybe even drop over the next several years. The Internet is a fad. I would never tell it that, but it won't last.

    1. Re:Duh by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm still holding onto my AOL stock. Dial-up private networks are coming back! YOU'LL SEE!

      I'll show all you doubters, and then Janine will take me back.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Duh by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the part where you tell us to get off your lawn. *shakes fist*

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It will not take to many years of doubling before the amount reaches good enough.

      Yeah because a real-time 3D virtual world interface run over our data pipes won't ever emerge or become standard; Or virtual machines usable from any terminal that move location in the grid; Or any other of a hundred things my little lizard brain can't conceive of yet.

      How can people continuously make the statement that at point x we'll have enough that we'll stop expanding our data/memory/network capacity? How many times do we have to make that mistake before we realize the assertion is silly.

  3. Self serving? by stokessd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmmm, a huge supplier of networking gear is saying that network will continue to grow...This article is making me want to buy a lot of networking gear to get ahead of the impending doubling. I wonder if that's the intent? Nah, couldn't be.

    Sheldon

  4. So buy buy buy more Cisco Router!!! by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No news here... yes, Internet traffic doubles over a relatively short period of time..

    The biggest challenge going forward is how we are possibly going to power all of this traffic. Electrical power costs are going to be raising 10-20% a year for the next little while. What we need to engineer is using the bandwidth more efficiently.

    I never thought I would say this, but Television still beats the Internet for delivering video content. As for video conferencing, it is cheaper to video conference than to fly, but again, the telephone conference call over POTS still delivers ALOT of bandwidth very efficiently. Not that I am a fan of the Telcos, I am a fan of the POTS, its a very mature infrastructure that delivers very high value.

    --
    Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
    1. Re:So buy buy buy more Cisco Router!!! by o1d5ch001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You've got to be friggin' kidding me. Analog TV is wasting huge amounts of bandwidth

      I didn't say a more efficient use of bandwidth, I said more efficient at delivering video, full stop. You can't compare what you _could_ do with what people _are_ doing. Let me give you some comparisons of existing technology.

      1: Bit torrent delivery of television quality 2h movie: Time 4-8 hours on average. 650-900 MB of DISK SPACE and bandwidth. Multiply this by the 400 people who download this, it is allot of time for allot of bandwidth.

      2. Youtube.com 2h tv quality video: You can't do it, its not available. Even if you could, it would still take hours to download, and then you could watch it on your puny laptop screen. Don't even get me started on hooking up most PCs to the TV (Macs shine at this, BTW).

      3. Aerial broadcast of 2h movie. Time: 2h. Bandwidth used: SHARED usage for 400-100,000 people. Damn efficient use of bandwidth and resources. Even if its not on-demand.

      4. Satellite broadcast: 500 channels from one satellite. SHARED usage for 1,000,000 - 24,000,000 million people. Damn efficient use of available bandwidth and resources.

      As far as I know, there is no-one with a large user base using the Internet for TV quality video. Never mind HD video quality that I get from my satellite today! This does not take into account the HUGE power requirements of data centers, routers, and the rest of the Internet Infrastructure. Broadcast TV and Satellite TV are great uses of bandwidth AND resources compared to other technologies.

      People have been promising multicast TV over IP for a long long time. I remember early 90s efforts that just failed because the REAL bandwidth and computing resources were just too high.

      --
      Q. What is Calvin's monster snowman called? A. The Torment Of Existence Weighed Against The Horror of Non Being
  5. Take advantage of IP Multicasting by Twide · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To combat the increase of traffic why cant businesses/ISP's work more towards multicasting? for at least some part of the webs streaming sources (internet radio.. etc) this would alleviate some of the load surely..

  6. Dark Fiber by argent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Network Scientists have discovered that the majority of the bandwidth in the Internet is "dark fiber", a mysterious substance that has the same gravitational effects on backhoes as normal fiber, but does not interact with the internet as a whole. Some believe is possible to harness this bandwidth through dark packets, but others fear the growth of pink packets (typically containing porn and spam) will eliminate any potential gains from this little-understood phenomenon. Other scientists, primarily at ISPs, believe that extracting dark money from end users through traffic surcharges is the only way to take advantage of dark fiber.

  7. Demand doubling...What about the supply? by elguillelmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will network infrastructure meet this doubling demand? Or is net traffic going to get stuck due to a series-of-tubes shortage?

    --
    Dawkins Revisited: A person is shit's way of making more shit -- Steve Barnett, anthropologist.
  8. "Everyone's going to buy lots more routers..." by Angostura · · Score: 3, Insightful

    .... router company tells shareholders.

  9. Time range by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Web traffic volumes will almost double every two years from 2007 to 2012

    But ONLY until Dec 31, 2011 when it will immediately stop doubling.

  10. What's the average in centibytes per fortnight? by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    There, got that out of the way.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:What's the average in centibytes per fortnight? by kmsigel · · Score: 4, Funny

      How many 0.08 bits every 14 days. I like it.

  11. A graph? by davidwr · · Score: 2, Funny

    And what shape would that graph have? Would it be a double-bell-curve shape or a compressed single-bell-curve shape?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  12. And in more news, apples fall to the ground by pieterh · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just the generalization of Moore's Law, caused by the standardized technology curve where costs fall to zero.

    I call this the "half-life rule" of technology, where the half-life is usually about 18 months: the cost of any technology will halve every 18 months. What remains in the end is raw materials, shipping, marketing.

    Since the cost of the Internet is falling constantly, its per-dollar capacity is doubling every 18 months.

    A corollary: Wikipedia's budget is 60% spent on hardware, and this sum is constant over the years, yet Wikipedia's content doubles every... 18 months or so. Moore's Law working in both directions, so we have more or less infinite expansion at a constant cost.

    Obviously the expansion is not infinite, because costs do not actually fall to zero and at a certain stage marketing, shipping, and usage costs outweigh production and account for 99.999% of the final cost.

    But still, this is hardly news unless people are shocked to learn that technology gets cheaper over time.

    While I'm ranting about people being surprised at the obvious, note that we can predict the cost of technology in the future, quite accurately, by applying the half-life rule to the production costs any given product, subtracting the fixed costs.

    So for example I can predict that cell phones will be disposable (costing under $10) within four years.

  13. Re:Quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually the apostrophes from TFA are an example of good standard journalistic practice. A news publication should never make a claim in a headline without some indication (the quotes) that it came from a source outside that publication. In this case, a report from Cisco. This is just one of many small textual differences between pubs with good journalistic integrity and those with not so much.

  14. Re:Jeez... by Bandman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll believe it when I get my flying car...

  15. Moore's Law works for technology. by hhw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With 10Gb circuits increasing in popularity and replacing OC48's, we're probably still in good shape, until 2012. Perhaps, by then the Cisco CRS-1 won't seem so overpriced. In the meantime, everyone can buy Juniper :)

    --
    http://astutehosting.com/
  16. Video conferencing schmideo conferencing by bevoblake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    35% growth in video conferencing annually? Maybe, but the technology still has leaps and bounds to go. After attending a recent all-day meeting via video conferencing, I realized that:
    1. You still can't make out expressions that well.
    2. The software that is supposed to auto-focus the camera on people doesn't work very well at all, focusing on quiet side bar conversations all too often.
    3. People were staring at their computers and blackberrys the entire time because very few people were actually in the same room.

    Maybe we'll have 35% growth given the high price of travel these days, but the technology needs some help.

  17. for the life of me by Speare · · Score: 2, Informative

    I left the apostrophes around the word 'double' in the title because the linked site has them, but for the life of me I can't figure out why.

    This is a very common headlining technique in non-USA journalism. The Australian news service is not drawing the conclusion that traffic will double. The news service is quoting a report from Cisco. As such, the headline can be ready as "IP Traffic Said to Double Every Two Years." The use of quotes instead of the omitted words is a space-saving technique, much like using a comma instead of the word and in "CmdrTaco Confused, Disoriented by Quotes."

    This isn't flamebait, but perhaps it is a flame. For the life of me, I can't see how an editor of a news-aggregating service can serve in that capacity for a decade and not pick up on these kinds of things. Even if you wish to disavow being a journalist or an editor, you might perhaps learn a thing or two from them.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  18. Butters' Law of Photonics by donkawechico · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...says that the amount of data coming out of an optical fiber is doubling every nine months. So every time traffic doubles, capacity pentuples.

    Granted, there's still the last-mile problem, deploying the technology, etc. But I wouldn't predict the collapse of the internet any time soon.