Slashdot Mirror
McCain Backs Nuclear Power
bagsc writes "Senator John McCain set out another branch of his energy policy agenda today, with a key point: 45 new nuclear power plants by 2030." So it finally appears that this discussion is back on the table. I'm curious how Nevada feels about this, as well as the Obama campaign. All it took was $4/gallon gas I guess. When it hits $5, I figure one of the campaigns will start to promote Perpetual Motion.
Hey jackass, where are you going to store all the nuclear waster? In your backyard? Let's sing you up. Do some research.
Better idea: put a breeder reactor RIGHT in my backyard. Reprocess the spent "waste" right back into fuel for reuse, like RESPONSIBLE people would (and DO) do in other countries.
The reason we don't have breeder reactors in America? Jimmy Carter thought the US could serve an "example" to tin-pot dictators like Syria, Pakistan, India, North Korea, Iran, China, etc... by having a "moratorium" on nuclear enrichment. Gee, how'd that work out so far?
You should check out my post on how to safely dispose of spent nuclear fuel.
But, then I actually know about nuclear technology and don't get all my information from biased, anti-nuclear environmentalists.
There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
as a concerned, and interested environmentalist, this:
"hysteria-spreading, anti-nuclear, tree-huggers"
just makes me stop reading. Great way to win over public opinion, talk down to and insult everyone who has understandable concerns about nuclear power. like it or not, chernobyl and 3 mile island happened. Like it or not, nuclear power stations are manned by people and subject to accidents and incompetence (and cost cutting). Insulting anyone who dares to air legitimate concerns is the best way to ensure they are never inclined to listen to your POV.
DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
now you are telling me I'm not technologically savvy. I'm a computer programmer. My wife is a geneticist. I am not a luddite. I am not spreading FUD, but yet the slashdot crowd will insult and talk down to me for daring to be concerned about the environment.
This is why people like me never listen to arguments in favour of nuclear power, because they always come served with a generous side salad of sarcasm, abuse and condescension.
DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
It's not necessarily the "funding" - it's getting past the NIMBY factor and all the hippy enviro-nutjobs who show up WHEREVER you try to build one causing trouble, trying to get your permits reconsidered/denied, making ludicrous false claims to force you to redo your impact studies a thousand times, and yes, even engaging in actual vandalism and destruction of property.
"Further, I suspect that by the time all the dust settles on bringing the next nuclear power plant online (10+ years is my off-the-cuff guess), that the cost for solar power will have dropped by an order of magnitude or two."
Howzat? The cost of raw materials for polysilicate is not going to go down, if anything it will go up. The cost of metal and the polishing sludge (which BTW is highly toxic and pretty much toxifies the soil forever even after the solar farm is removed from the area) for solar farms? Don't make me laugh.
My thought is to take all the nuclear public subsidy money and plug it into purchase contracts to install solar power on gov't facilities.
And if you had more than two brain cells to rub together, you'd realize why this is a fucking stupid idea. See above. No seriously, look up, see the cloud, and realize how EASY it is to get into a power deficit if you rely solely on solar.
The other half of his argument was that "if we don't reprocess nuclear materials, it'll be an example to other nations and they won't either."
And as a result, the following nations lack either Nuclear Weapons or Nuclear Weapon Programs today: North Korea, Pakistan, India, Syria, Iran, China... oh, right.
Carter is, and has always been, a moron.