Slashdot Mirror


Water Ice On Mars

cathector sends along a story from SpaceWeather.com on the discovery of water ice on Mars. "Scientists have figured out the mysterious white substance unearthed by NASA's Phoenix lander on Mars. It's frozen water. The breakthrough came last week when Phoenix's stereo camera caught the substance in the act of disappearing. Bathed in martian sunlight for four days, the white substance sublimated — i.e., it transformed from solid to gas without passing through the liquid state. This is how water behaves on Mars.... Some readers have asked, how do we know the white substance is not frozen CO2 (dry ice) instead of frozen water? Answer: Phoenix's landing site is too warm for dry ice. The average daily temperature is about -70 F while dry ice requires temperatures lower than about -109 F." The animated GIF showing the ice sublimating is pretty nice too.

60 of 364 comments (clear)

  1. POOL PARTY!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we just need a little global warming.

  2. $3,000,000 mint juleps at next year's derby by ecklesweb · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news, NASA announced today that a manned mission to Mars is planned to retreive the newly found ice in time for the 2012 Kentucky Derby. NASA plans to upstage Woodford Reserve's famous $1000 Mint Julep at the race with its own $3,000,000 version of the traditional cocktail. While plans are still being firmed up, the beverage will reportedly come in a limited edition collector's glass.

  3. Snow by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Pardon my total ignorance of the subject, but does this mean that it might occasionally snow on mars? Or would the environment be too different to allow it?

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
    1. Re:Snow by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, martian air is way too dry to form snow. There is water in the athmosphere, but IIRC it is something like a layer 1mm thick if all the water would condense on the ground. What happens is that some of that water freezes to/in the ground if it gets cold enough.

      What I learned from following the press conferences online, is that since mars doesn't have a large moon, the axis of rotation changes much more than earth does, so if it is directed towards the sun, the ice could actually melt.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    2. Re:Snow by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pardon my total ignorance of the subject, but does this mean that it might occasionally snow on mars? Or would the environment be too different to allow it? The area the lander in is covered by ice during the winter so we are going to find the answer to your question quite soon.
    3. Re:Snow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      we should wisely remember that all these claims of ice or dry ice and so many other speculations are based on our earthly experience and so are limited to our sense perception. the fact is that every planet, all those millions that you can and cannot see in the sky are fully habitable and many many people are living there. this is the knowledge coming from the topmost intelligent people who have ever appeared on this planet and given fully scientific information about other planets. spending billions on exploring other planets is waste of money when such knowledge already exists. For more details read "easy journey to other planetes" by His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada. Hare Krishna.

  4. Dupe from Thursday by slagheap · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    First against the wall when the revolution comes
  5. Water sublimating by NoobixCube · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If I remember my chemistry classes correctly (there is a high chance I don't), water would do this under lower air pressure, I think. Correct me if I'm wrong, I just thought some kind of explanation would be better than "because it's on Mars".

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    1. Re:Water sublimating by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is water the only material that can sublimate? If not, why should we be so sure this has to be water just because we want it to be?

    2. Re:Water sublimating by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doesn't really need to be under low air pressure, if ice is in the presence of low vapor-pressure it will sublimate (see icecube tray in your freezer).

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    3. Re:Water sublimating by cyklo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Indeed it does, and it's probably better explained using a triple point diagram:

      http://www.chemistrydaily.com/chemistry/Image:Phase-diag.png

      On earth (at higher pressures), increasing temperature goes from the solid, to liquid, and then to gas phases (the triple-point in the middle is at zero degress celcius)

      The lower atmospheric pressure on Mars (~1% of sea-level earth pressure) means that you go straight from solid to gas. In fact, the liquid part is actually impossible (IANAChemist) unless you increase the pressure sufficiently.

    4. Re:Water sublimating by cathector · · Score: 5, Informative

      water sublimation doesn't need to be exotic; it happens in your freezer all the time.
      you know how ice cubes gradually lose their sharp edges and finally become just little puddle-shaped lumps in the bottom of the ice try ? that's sublimation too.

    5. Re:Water sublimating by PieSquared · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty much anything can sublimate under the proper conditions. But when you say "a white solid that sublimates at -70 degrees F and martian surface pressure and is found in macroscopic quantities naturally" you narrow down the field quite a bit. In this case, to exactly one reasonable possibility.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    6. Re:Water sublimating by mrbluze · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is water the only material that can sublimate?

      To quote wikipedia: This can occur if the atmospheric pressure exerted on the substance is too low to stop the molecules from escaping from the solid state.

      Atmospheric pressure is not as important as the partial pressure of the substance at its surface. That is, in this case, the vapour pressure of water which is practically zero on Mars. Therefore water, if it is not locked down in crystalline form, cannot exist in liquid form because it cannot form an equilibrium with its surroundings to form a 'triple point' (solid/liquid/vapour phase temperature).

      It also depends, as far as I understand, on the interaction between molecules of the substance. If it is too weak, the range of temperatures at which the substance can be liquid is narrow (or practically zero). It's a fairly wide range for water, though.

      I didn't study the topic beyond that and it was years ago.

      PS. Iodine is another substance that sublimates.

      --
      Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
    7. Re:Water sublimating by KKlaus · · Score: 3, Informative

      All materials sublimate. The liquid phase doesn't exist beneath a substance's triple point, so at pressures beneath that level temperature increases cause the material to go directly from solid to gaseous (sublimate). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Phase-diag2.svga has a good picture of what we're thinking about.

      --
      Relax I just want some peanuts.
  6. Better picture by Jade+E.+2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    That animation is actually cut off. The main sublimation that was observed is below the frame of that picture. There's a better one here, where you can actually see the small chunks farther down disappearing completely.

  7. Martian ice is really big news, folks! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    It means we finally have a suitable accompaniment for Martian scotch.

    1. Re:Martian ice is really big news, folks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Neat!

      Sorry - it's a Scotch joke.

    2. Re:Martian ice is really big news, folks! by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Funny

      It means we finally have a suitable accompaniment for Martian scotch.

      Please call it by its proper name, would you?

      Martch.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  8. Re:Wow by thermian · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're absolutelly right, all we need now is some Martian Whisky and the social lives of any future human expedition is well and truly sorted out.

    --
    A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
  9. Interesting press coverage of this. by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've noticed that almost all of the news headlines covering this are qualified statements like "Lander finds water on Mars, according to scientists". As if they're afraid to actually say something straightforward like "Water found on Mars" and they have to make it clear that they're just reporting what someone else is saying (with the implication that maybe they don't really believe it). At the same time they seem to have no problem with other headlines like "Celebrity Arrested Drunk" without the need to qualify it as "Celebrity Arrested Drunk According To Police" etc.

    Maybe it's just me, but I mind it a bit irksome that so many big news outlets seem so detached from any sort of science reporting these days.

    G.

  10. Re:Wind? by Mr2cents · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was at the bottom of a trench. Plus, wind doesn't selecticely blow white rocks away while letting the rest of the scene untouched. Plus, you can also see some white areas at the end of the trench getting smaller.

    It's ice. Definitely.

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  11. average daily temperature by Swampash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could we have this important information in units used by, I don't know, the rest of the world?

    1. Re:average daily temperature by belg4mit · · Score: 4, Funny

      Send your own fucking probe if you can't be bothered to subtract 32 and multiply by 4/9.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:average daily temperature by drawfour · · Score: 4, Funny

      They would be better off sending their own fucking probe than subtracting 32 and multiplying by 4/9. I'm not sure what units those are, but certainly not Celsius.

    3. Re:average daily temperature by dakameleon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Calculate your own conversion to attempt-by-the-French-to-regain-relevance-on-the-world-stage units.

      Gee, if metric is an attempt by France to regain relevance, they've succeeded everywhere bar America. Continuing use of imperial units must be attempt-by-the-Americans-to-deny-progress-and-sanity.

      Metric is the global standard. Get over it.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    4. Re:average daily temperature by Solandri · · Score: 5, Funny

      Could we have this important information in units used by, I don't know, the rest of the world?
      Hah! With this announcement, NASA has predicated that Fahrenheit is now used on the surface of two worlds, thus re-establishing its dominance over that other temperature unit which is only used in part of one world. We will wrest control of this universe back from you metric heathens, even if we have to do it one planet at a time!
    5. Re:average daily temperature by o'davy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Calculate your own conversion to attempt-by-the-French-to-regain-relevance-on-the-world-stage units.

      Gee, if metric is an attempt by France to regain relevance, they've succeeded everywhere bar America.

      And yet they've succeeded in every bar in America. Checking the units used to measure wine and booze ... yep, metric.

      --
      Sig goes here.
    6. Re:average daily temperature by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 4, Funny

      Long live imperial units! I say, if God had wanted us to use metric, He would have given us ten fingers! ...

      oh, crap.

      --
      I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  12. Re:Stupid terraforming.. by CDMA_Demo · · Score: 4, Informative

    escape velocity on mars is 5.027 km/s, and water vapor will slowly move out of mars because of its high rms velocity. So, the answer is "no"

  13. Re:What about the pressure? by CaptainPatent · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm sure that quote was with regard to the conditions of Mars.

    You are also correct to assume that Martian pressure is nowhere near what is required for room-temperature dry ice. In fact it's about 1% that of earth's atmosphere. More reading here.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  14. One Problem: by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the problem: We still don't know conclusively. Yes, we have observations which are highly suggestive, but we don't have a chemical composition of the substance, so we don't know for sure.

    Science is a hard mistress; she demands proof before making such claims.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:One Problem: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> Science is a hard mistress; she demands proof before making such claims.

      I shall have this woman.

  15. In Other News... by CaptainPatent · · Score: 4, Funny

    News fails to take responsibility according to one internet poster.

    More at 8.

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
  16. Re:Wind? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not only that, but Phoenix has a little weather station on board called the Telltale project. And if you look at this page you can see the weather reports for where Phoenix is on a sol by sol basis. None of them show windy conditions, although it looks like there is data missing for a few sols.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  17. ice on Mars is nothing new by speedtux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Finding water was one of the key goals of the Phoenix mission.

    That is a bizarre statement. Large quantities of ice have been observed in numerous ways already. Even the Viking lander observed water frost directly in the 1970's:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_2

    http://www.solarviews.com/cap/mars/frost.htm

    That frost sublimated just like this ice did.

    Here are other observations:

    http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/28may_marsice.htm

    Here you can see a frozen crater lake:

    http://esamultimedia.esa.int/images/marsexpress/210-010705-1343-6-co-01-CraterIce_H.jpg

    http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Mars_Express/SEMGKA808BE_0.html

    Not only is that ice, it may actually be an outflow.

    What makes the results from Phoenix exciting is that the actual experiments that Phoenix is supposed to perform depend on having landed on ice. But finding ice somewhere on Mars is not a surprise.

    1. Re:ice on Mars is nothing new by TennilleGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, water ice on Mars is nothing new. That's why they went there. They could not have another failed mission, could they? Before Phoenix there was Opportunity. Why? The NASA-funded mineralogical neophytes spent our money looking for liquid water where they saw widespread hematite...coarse grained grey hematite. Fe2O3...no water in its structure! On Earth, in the banded iron formations that are BILLIONS of years old, that is a metamorphic mineral. It did not form in liquid water! Its PRECURSOR minerals (goethite; ferrihydrite; lepidocrocite) did form in water. Using hematite as a "beacon" for liquid water would be like using anthracite coal as a beacon for a coal swamp or a piece of chinaware as a beacon for a kaolin mine. Now we have a mission that is the equivalent of finding sand in the Sahara Desert? They KNEW that there was water ice there...for years. Big deal? Unbelievable spin! If they actually find anything relevant to life on Mars one needs to inquire... Why didn't they go there in the first place? Why did they waste our money landing in a billion year old metamorphic landscape? Even the face-saving hematite "blueberries" are a joke when placed into context with the remote data used to select that landing site...platy coarse-grained hematite.

  18. Re:Wind? by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, we admit it - none of the NASA scientists are as smart as you are, the whole "powder" thing just never occurred to them. Doh!

    --
    This space available.
  19. Re:Wind? by mrbluze · · Score: 4, Funny

    But it would selectively blow an ultrafine powder which happened to be white. Surely the wind would be better off snorting it?
    --
    Do it yourself, because no one else will do it yourself. [beta blockade 10-17 Feb]
  20. Re:Stupid terraforming.. by Bob(TM) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, that argument can be made for any atmospheric gas constituent, not just water vapor.

    There is less water in the Martian atmosphere oxygen while the water is more massive, so the oxygen would leave at a proportionally greater rate (assuming we are observing a long term steady state). One theory of the rapid loss has more to do with disassociation of H and O by UV radiation. H would quickly leave by your molecular motion argument leaving a relatively larger amount of O.

    If that's the case, we'd be much better off leaving it subsurface for life sustaining purposes - sublimed ice is lost water. Now, we could use a bunch of nukes to lift dust to the increase greenhouse effect ... :)

    --

    The little guy just ain't getting it, is he?
  21. How come the water is so white/clean? by viking80 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First, I think the best evidence so far that this is water is not this picture, but the fact that the Mars Orbiter's spectrometer determined that that is was a lot of hydrogen in the ground near the poles.

    That some white stuff vanishes is poor evidence. They need to get the white stuff in an oven and test it.

    Let's assume it is water.
    What really puzzles me is how clean the water is. It is covered with what would make a dirty mud if it ever melted together. Also on earth, you never have clean water if you have flash floods like what you see as a result of a volcanic eruption or meteroid impact. You only have clean water/ice in snow and still lakes/oceans.
    This implies:
    1. The ice has not melted after the dust blew over it.(A long time)
    2. It used to be a lake/ocean or snow

    So the purity of the ice might be a bigger discovery than the fact that it is ice there.

    --
    don't cut it off www.mgmbill.org
  22. I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pretty much anything can sublimate under the proper conditions. But when you say "a white solid that sublimates at -70 degrees F and martian surface pressure and is found in macroscopic quantities naturally" you narrow down the field quite a bit. In this case, to exactly one reasonable possibility.

    Yep, Vodka.

    1. Re:I know by wellingj · · Score: 4, Funny

      Vodka is just sitting around mars on the ground? Where do we buy the tickets...

  23. phase diagram by daemonburrito · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here

    How to read them

    I feel that a great disservice was done to a lot of us early on with a simplistic view of the usual three phases of matter.

    And yes, you're right. That is part of the explanation.

  24. Re:Life on Mars by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Perhaps next mission they should take along some sugar. Put it out and see if it 'sublimates' as well.

    Memo to all Enforcers:
    By order of the Council of Elders, anyone caught consuming the sweet, sweet bait near the robotic invader from the blue planet is to have his gelsacs summarily pierced.
    Signed,
    K'Breel
    --
    There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
  25. Re:Wow by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

    > Hopefully they are right about it.
    Of course they're right about it, they have solid photographic evidence.

  26. Re:Life on Mars by HitekHobo · · Score: 3, Funny

    A similar experiment was recently conducted to determine the existence of life in Congress. A large pile of money was left sitting out which sublimated while votes accreted; thereby proving the existence of life in Congress. It is still up for debate how long before intelligent life is found in Congress.

  27. Four days apart by Trogre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So these two frames were taken four days apart while the sublimation was taking place. My question would be - where are the rest of the frames? Does this lander really only "look around" every few days?

    It would be nice to see it at even a 1-day resolution and get a 4-frame animation of the process. Those lumps should be seen to get smaller and vanish.

    Not that I'm complaining, this is still very cool (no pun intended).

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  28. Re:could be CO2? by belg4mit · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, still not cold enough as far as I can tell given this phase diagram and these temperatures and pressures.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  29. Standards.... by jonfr · · Score: 5, Informative

    U.S needs to upgrade it's standards. A good start would to move from Fahrenheit to Celsius. After that you can move over to the metric system.

    -70 F is -56 C
    -109 F is -78 C

    Conversion done with Google.

  30. Re:Wind? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The AC is thinking critically, while you appeal to authority. Which type gets to work at NASA?

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  31. Re:Wow by pclminion · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'd hope that after 300 or so years of chemistry we'd understand how to recognize water...

  32. not necessarily amazing by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Interesting

    there's a number of geological processes that can concentrate water like this

    in areas on earth where a lot of freezing and thawing occurs on earth, rocks get concentrated neatly in rings according to size, as if someone sorted them

    i'm not saying this process is anything like why the ice is so pure on mars, what i am saying is that there are plenty of natural processes out there that concentrate materials in orders that, contraintuitively, seem like it took intelligent concentration, but are in fact totally natural

    i won't even begin to speculate what processes on mars could do this, but i wouldn't be surprised if someone more knowledgeable than me could describe such a natural mechanism for ice purification on mars

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  33. Re:Wind? by Free+the+Cowards · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Neither, because NASA only hires smart people.

    --
    If you mod me Overrated, you are admitting that you have no penis.
  34. Re:Wow by omeomi · · Score: 5, Informative

    I thought this Wired quote about why the water sublimates on Mars is interesting:

    "Just like dry ice does here on Earth, water ice goes from solid to gas when the pressure is below 6.1 millibars and it gets heated (like it does in the Martian sun). It can also go straight from solid to gas above 6.1 millibars when the vapor pressure (amount of water vapor in the air) is low enough. This is because the molecules of water in solid form and gas form are not at equilibrium."

    http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/06/answering-mars.html

  35. Re:Wow - not by ThePeices · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a fair bit of difference between believing and knowing!

  36. Re:Wind? by neumayr · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're right. Definitely photoshopped.

    --
    Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
  37. Re:Wow by Bombula · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Your joke reveals another truth: the limitations of remote instruments. Countless debates in slashdot threads have been had about human versus robotic space exploration. Many folks argue that robots are just as effective as people. Well, certainly they are more cost-effective, but as this Phoenix episode shows they are certainly NOT more effective in practical terms.

    It took many days to determine that the white stuff Phoenix uncovered was ice (and not salt). An astronaut on Mars would have made that determination within seconds.

    --
    A-Bomb
  38. Re:Personally by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, there are asteroids that are pure (or near pure) ammonia. Second, the CFCs are nice, but the ammonia is cheaper and useful afterwards. In particular, the Ammonia starts off as greenhouse gas and then breaks down into pure N2, which then becomes a buffer gas. With CFCs, we would have to import or mine it. As to the water, well, you break up the asteroid just as you hit the atmosphere. Never impacts.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  39. That's not water... by linuxpyro · · Score: 3, Funny

    After looking at that fascinating GIF from the summary, I'm not sure it is water. It just kind of disappears. It's probably some sort of highly advanced life form that can change its shape at will and lives beneath the planet's surface most of the time. It then just came up for a little Martian sunshine and, upon noticing our probe went back to tell its buddies that the Earthlings sent more crap to their planet and that they should expect an invasion soon. Unless they can prove to us they don't have any oil.

    Well, that's what it looks like to me. Draw your own conclusions.

    --
    Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this" in a post is the best way to get it modded up.