Slashdot Mirror
First Image of Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo
mtargettuk writes "First image of Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo structure:
Virgin Galactic's SpaceShipTwo is under construction at Scaled Composites in Mojave, California and Flightglobal has obtained what appears to be the first image of its cockpit section."
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/hyperbola/2008/06/spaceshiptwo-cockpit-composite.html
-V
The link in the article appears to be protected against offsite linking. If you want to view its contents, make sure you open it in a new window. If the site detects Slashdot, you will be redirected to the sitemap.
That being said, I'm not sure if it's worth bothering. The photo is a sneaky shot of a component of the airframe. Specifically the nose-cone and forward portion of the craft. It's gray in color. Really, if you've seen an airplane before, you'll be just about as impressed.
So unless you're a competitor looking to derive secrets about SpaceShipTwo's construction, just move along. There's nothing to see here.
Javascript + Nintendo DSi = DSiCade
And after only 4 comments, it's already slashdotted.
Searching on Google suggests the url was probably correct. The google cache link is here
In case the image doesn't show up (google cache still loads images from origin site), here it is on imageshack
Is crushing a suspect's child's testicles illegal?
John Yoo: "No, [if] the President thinks he needs to do that."
OK, its carbon composite, and carbon is black before coating.
Works perfectly fine here - problem with your browser?
No, I just confused their sitemap with a squatter. It looked like a template squatter page, and definitely did not have the content I was looking for, so I didn't give it a seconds worth of thought.
Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
It is moderated interesting because it is interesting it got moderated interesting.
"The masses" in this context are people who can afford to pay six figures for a joyride to take them to a tenth of the delta-V needed for orbit in an vehicle design that physically cannot scale to orbit.
Meanwhile, actual orbital vehicle development continues. The massive Falcon 9 has not only completed its one engine firing, its two engine firing, and its three engine firing, all flawlessly, but also it's five engine firing. Only one more static firing is scheduled before launch (all nine engines). The smaller Falcon 1, which would have easily reached orbit in its last test flight but for either the lack of a bump *or* the presence of an upper-stage baffle, now is designed both to prevent the bump *and* now has an upper-stage baffle. It will be launching within the next month with its first payload, and the Falcon 9 should launch by the end of the year. The Falcon series represents a two to three fold price cut per kilogram compared to similar sized launch vehicles after almost half a century of price stagnation.
But hey, by all means, Slashdot is free to continue largely ignoring them (dedicating roughly the same number of articles to SpaceShipTwo, of which only minimal info has been released yet as the entire Falcon series through its history) and to keep reporting on every last detail from this unscaleable joyride.
Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."
They're hardly comparable are they! Slashdot readers are far more interested in something which will take PEOPLE into space, rather than yet another satellite lifter that's only interesting because it's cheaper to make.
Apart from anything, SpaceShipOne/Two just simply looks WAY cooler! I know that's not a very good reason, but it probably IS a reason.
I think most people are interested in feeling like they're going into space, zero-G, black sky, take some pics, then coming back again safely. You don't need an orbital vehicle for ANY of those things.
Falcon 9 is about as exciting as a Toyota Prius - only interesting if you're the one that's going to be saving the money.
They're hardly comparable are they! Slashdot readers are far more interested in something which will take PEOPLE into space, rather than yet another satellite lifter that's only interesting because it's cheaper to make.
Apparently you've never heard of the Dragon. The Falcon series is designed to lift cargo *and* people to orbit. Unlike the shuttle, they made the wise (IMHO) decision to not require people to be on every liftoff; you include people when you want to lift people, and not otherwise. The first Dragon flight is scheduled for early next year. Both Falcon and Dragon have passed every NASA COTS review so far (example).
Also, once again, the old fallacy of "being in space is roughly equivalent to being in orbit" rears its ugly head. Sadly, this happens in pretty much every thread about SS1/SS2.
Apart from anything, SpaceShipOne/Two just simply looks WAY cooler!
You hit the nail on the head.
Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."
1) Falcon 9 is far closer to "completing a successful test flight" than SpaceShipTwo. It has completed four static test firings, compared to a resounding zero for SS2.
2) No, it is not a "cargo rocket"; it's designed for either cargo *or* the Dragon spacecraft, which is scheduled to launch in Q1 of next year. You see, back in the real world of orbital rocketry, there's this little thing called "staging" that you have to deal with. And no, the tiny bit of extra altitude and speed from the White Knight hardly counts. In real, orbital rocketry, you can't generally afford to be hauling around the mass of what got you there.
will put space within reach
Count "2" for the number of times that "space" and "orbit" have been predictably treated as though they're roughly equivalent, when they're not even close.
which has already PROVEN its viability with several successful test flights.
Just the first stage of Falcon 1 gave more delta-V in a single launch than all of SS1's flights combined. It was only the second stage that failed, and really, it only "failed" in that the engine shut down early due to a slosh, which has been corrected in two different ways. Even the payload separated normally.
You're comparing a Segway with an EV1 here. The flight envelope of SS1 and SS2 isn't even remotely, slightly, trivially comparable to that of the Falcon series.
Powell: "So, what are we doing?" Cheney: "Oh, crime." Powell: "Crime? Good, OK... crime..."