Slashdot Mirror


Huge Traffic On Wikipedia's Non-Profit Budget

miller60 writes "'As a non-profit running one of the world's busiest web destinations, Wikipedia provides an unusual case study of a high-performance site. In an era when Google and Microsoft can spend $500 million on one of their global data center projects, Wikipedia's infrastructure runs on fewer than 300 servers housed in a single data center in Tampa, Fla.' Domas Mituzas of MySQL/Sun gave a presentation Monday at the Velocity conference that provided an inside look at the technology behind Wikipedia, which he calls an 'operations underdog.'"

10 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Easy to Increase the budget or add servers by Subm · · Score: 5, Funny

    How hard can it be to increase the budget or add more servers?

    Just go to the Wikipedia page with those numbers and change them. You don't even need to have an account.

    1. Re:Easy to Increase the budget or add servers by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In their defense, if you're going to run your entire site off a single server farm,a coastal city in Florida is the logical place to put it.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Note to self by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you ever find yourself in a flamewar on Wikipedia you cannot win, bomb Tampa, Florida out of existence.

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Note to self by canajin56 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's your solution to everything.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  3. Re:Some thoughts by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you want to pay for software, or do you want to pay for people?

    Only one can create the other.

    Oh, gods, let's hope so!
  4. Re:I've always wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It would be neat to have a deeper look at their budget to see how I can save money and boost performance at work."

    Since they are using LAMP, obviously they could save money by following Microsoft's "Get The Facts" advice!

  5. Re:Wikipedia = much more traffic than slashdot by hostyle · · Score: 5, Funny

    OTOH, if Wikipedia linked slashdot on every page slashdot would go down, if do to nothing else but bandwidth exhaustion.

    Sounds like a dare to me. Gentlemen, start your packets!
    --
    Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
  6. Re:The power of low standards by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Screw that, I want a bank with six twos of performance. 22.2222%. Of course, any number of nines is easy to achieve. Want six nines? 9.99999% is easy.

  7. Re:Wikipedia = much more traffic than slashdot by BooRolla · · Score: 5, Funny

    If only there were some way to put links on to Wikipedia!