Fresh Air For Windows?
jmcbain writes "The NY Times has an opinion piece on how the next Windows could be designed (even through Microsoft has already laid plans for Windows 7). The author suggests 'A monolithic operating system like Windows perpetuates an obsolete design. We don't need to load up our machines with bloated layers we won't use.' He also brings up the example of Apple breaking ties with its legacy OS when OS X was built. Can Windows move forward with a completely new, fast, and secure OS and still keep legacy application support?"
Can Windows move forward with a completely new, fast, and secure OS and still keep legacy application support?
Based on past performance: No.
This has been another edition of Short Answers to Stupid Quesitons.
Remember Vista? Supporting legacy apps is already something MS has no interest in, apparently.
WinCE. Pity about the name, though.
I vote for a chair breaking a Window :D
No, I'm serious. Get a picture from the Microsoft Headquarters, and from a building, add a chair breaking a window and falling to the floor. Cartoonize it, and you're done! :)
I would argue that the New York Times is better qualified to write an OS than Microsoft is...
Just switch to Mac and get parallels :P
Yeah, I know, not very funny. But does every comment have to be great?
PS: I don't reply to ACs.
If anyone doesn't get the Borg reference, they don't belong here, they should be at the geek office turning in their geek card (or educating themselves, whichever they prefer).
"16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
How about a dancing egg'ed Steve Ballmer who is throwing a chair? :)
Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
That icon is there for legacy purposes.
Is that a challenge?
Static
Animated GIF
The extra 30GB is to hold the fine print on the new EULA.
Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear