Slashdot Mirror


FBI's New Eye Scan Database Raising Eyebrows

mattnyc99 writes "The FBI has confirmed to Popular Mechanics that it's not only adding palm prints to its criminal records, but preparing to balloon its repository of photos, which an agency official says 'could be the basis for our facial recognition.' It's all part of a new biometric software system that could store millions of iris scans within 10 years and has privacy advocates crying foul. Quoting: 'The FBI's Next Generation Identification (NGI) system, which could cost as much as $1 billion over its 10-year life cycle, will create an unprecedented database of biometric markers, such as facial images and iris scans. For criminal investigators, NGI could be as useful as DNA some day — a distinctive scar or a lopsided jaw line could mean the difference between a cold case and closed one. And for privacy watchdogs, it's a dual threat — seen as a step toward a police state, and a gold mine of personal data waiting to be plundered by cybercriminals.'"

24 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. Want to make money? by InvisblePinkUnicorn · · Score: 3, Funny

    There has never been a better time to invest in Ray-Ban!

  2. 'Duel' threat? by mfnickster · · Score: 4, Funny

    > And for privacy watchdogs, it's a duel threat

    I guess they really threw down the gauntlet, huh?

    Now which weapon should I choose... rapier and/or dagger?

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    1. Re:'Duel' threat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Curses, foil'd again!

    2. Re:'Duel' threat? by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think I'll take banjos, for $500.

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    3. Re:'Duel' threat? by dreamchaser · · Score: 2, Funny

      BFG 9000 for me please.

  3. En Garde by Quattro+Vezina · · Score: 5, Funny

    And for privacy watchdogs, it's a duel threat

    En garde!

    --
    I support the Center for Consumer Freedom
  4. well of course it's raising eyebrows... by wisebabo · · Score: 4, Funny

    how else would the scanner be able to read the eye?

  5. Re:too many movies Which threat is worse? by davidsyes · · Score: 1, Funny

    Retinal, Iris, or Iro-Recto?

    IIRC, there is a hidden part of the body having its OWN type of "fingerprint". An Oculo-Anulo scan, like in a pair of calipers, would give quite a .... measure of one's eye-dent-tity...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  6. Re:ok, so what's next? by techpawn · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know how we have Godwin's law about Nazi Germany? Does anyone know if there is one about Orwell? I mean, it's fitting, but we'd be hitting it a lot lately.

    --
    Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what your country did to you
  7. I see where this is going... by Aphoxema · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, what about the people with no eyeballs? OR HANDS?! OR FACES!? OR EVEN DNA?! You think criminals are dangerous, it's the criminal zombies you have to be really afraid of! AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  8. They never would have caught me... by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Funny

    if I hadn't left an image of my retina at the crime scene!

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  9. Re:too many movies by computational+super · · Score: 3, Funny
    my eyes are still fine.

    Hey! I'm over here!

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  10. Re:too many movies by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least it will give some of us an excuse for looking at a female's breasts when talking to her. I'm all for this now.

  11. Re:too many movies by digitalhermit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or going outside when the sun is shining.

    What is this "sun" of which you speak?

  12. Re:I must say... by sp332 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ugh, eye hate these puns...

  13. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It requires a tattoo on your wrist or forehead. Research indicates it will be very popular. The Obama campaign is considering requiring it as part of their Universal Health Care program.

  14. Re:Hold up by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

    I do not leave my iris information at a crime scene.

    Er... what *do* you leave at your crime scenes?

  15. Re:Eyeglasses an advantage! by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 2, Funny

    looks like all us "four-eyes" are going to have an extra modicum of privacy.

    Naw, you'll just get put on the terror list first.

    Think about it. You wear glasses because you are correcting your vision, possibly because you enjoy reading. While reading, you might be exposed to materials that are critical of plans to implement things such as iris scanners. Reading these critiques might cause you to begin thinking the government maybe exceeded its authority.

    This kind of "thinking" is a strict no-no. True patriots never question; they obey.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  16. At first when I read this... by hyperz69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I saw Rectal Scanner. I wasn't at all surprised, just prayed there was still room in the budget for KY!

  17. Re:too many movies by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Funny

    You go outside!?

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  18. Re:Blah by xonar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also it pointed out that a way to defeat this is any drug that dialates the pupils. So; smoke a bong and smile ;)

    Marijuana doesn't dialate the pupils, although it can make your eyes red and droopy (maybe just as good). Non-addictive drugs don't do jack to the pupils.

    If you want your eyes dialated, you're going to have to snort coke or smoke meth or crack. Downers and narcotics like Heroin or Demerol will make your pupils constrict.

    Most psychedelics will alter your pupil size and are not physically addicting (besides Ketamine, woo yay). I know LSD and Psilocybin/Psilocin will dialate your pupils WAAAY more than coke/crack/meth. Though there's a SLIGHT possibility of it interfering with your daily tasks :P

  19. Re:Blah by gnick · · Score: 3, Funny

    Non-addictive drugs don't do jack to the pupils.

    Echo xonar's note on the psychedelics. A good healthy breakfast of funky fungus will blow your pupils to the point that the iris is difficult to find, let alone ID.

    However, it's not terribly difficult to recognize when somebody is on mushrooms/LSD/etc. If they're going to detain you based on your irises, having them missing is probably just as effective a way to get arrested as springing up a positive match.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  20. Re:Blah by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 3, Funny

    And if illegal amphetamines or hallucinegenics don't do it for you, then you could always try something really crazy, like eye drops.

  21. Re:Eyeglasses an advantage! by plasmacutter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought the requisite income for owning a monocle meant you were controlling the surveillance system.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!