Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Breaks 8 Million, Gets Into Guinness

Punkster812 writes "Mozilla has gotten the results back from the Guinness World Records and the official number that will be set as the record is 8,002,530 downloads. The day started out a little rough for them, with server troubles during the initial launch, but once they got everything going, they were able to transfer 62,419,734 MB in 24 hours. You can get more information, including a breakdown of how many downloads each country did from around the world, by visiting spreadfirefox.com. Congratulations, Mozilla, on the new record."

14 of 199 comments (clear)

  1. Arbitrary but impressive by jbarr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It appears that this is the first recorded record by Guinness Book, so it's kind of arbitrary, however shuttling 62TB of data is pretty impressive. Now that the gauntlet has been thrown down, it'll be interesting to see if other software companies will try to compete. If nothing else, this gave Firefox some much-needed press.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  2. Congrats on breaking the non-existent record by TheRedSeven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, this is a great thing. But considering that no record existed previously, it's not exactly earth-shattering. I look to see this record broken with subsequent launches, as more and more people have access to the internet, and as Mozilla gains more share. Also, 7.7 million of the total came from the US. It would be great to see a larger overseas distribution, especially considering the pledges that were signed in places like Africa.

    1. Re:Congrats on breaking the non-existent record by ergo98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, 7.7 million of the total came from the US

      I don't think the map below the entry charts just the downloads on download day, given that simply adding Canada (at 790,624 actually comprising more per capita than the US) puts it far over their record count.

    2. Re:Congrats on breaking the non-existent record by Slashidiot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you are right. Also, talking about per capita, is there somewhere a list of downloads per capita en each country? That would be nice to know, as total downloads mean very little (yeah, of course here in luxembourg we had very few downloads, the country is tiny!)

      Some random (a bit biased) selection of countries with downloads per capita (x1000). Data comes from the Spread Firefox webpage and population from wikipedia

      Canada 23.74
      US 25.40
      Germany 30.00
      UK 19.79
      France 15.19
      Spain 17.90
      Luxembourg 36.72

      Now, this tells me more than just downloads per country. Now Luxembourg looks better :).

      --
      Tis women makes us love, Tis Love that makes us sad, Tis sadness makes us drink, And drinking makes us mad.
  3. Good work! by gparent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An excellent move for Mozilla. Although I'm sure a lot of these downloads were from existent Firefox 1.5/2 users, I'm sure some of the people using Internet Explorer jumped on the FF bandwagon. Less spyware, better browsing, less bullshit. Good work.

    1. Re:Good work! by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You say "complacency" like it's such a bad thing.

      No, I say complacency like it's a real consumer motivator, which it is.

      Complacency is the reason that inferior products can succeed if they're cleverly bundled. There is endless inefficiency in the market, where people are overcharged or provided inferior products or services for their money (for instance so long as the audience is complacent, movies will continue inserting more and more ads), because they are complacent about it, not wanting to be bothered thinking about it or making any transition or challenging the status quo.

      This is simply a statement of fact, not an indictment of complacent users. Everyone is complacent in some areas of life (I don't like complaining about bad service at restaurants, and always leave a good tip, so in essence I am encouraging and supporting shit service and food quality), and the simple hard fact is that so long as IE is bundled and automatically pushed via Windows update, Firefox has a plexiglass ceiling limiting its market saturation.

  4. Re:lame by gparent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Considering Internet Explorer ships with Windows and most often is forced on users with automatic updates, this is hardly surprising. At least Firefox users choose to download it. (And yes, I know you can turn auto updates off).

  5. Re:lame by __aamnbm3774 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    yea but seriously, what does this number even mean??

    I doubt exactly, 8,002,530 people installed it and are using it. You know there were plenty of anti-microsoft nerds who downloaded it 50 times each.

    We might as well just stick to bandwidth measurements, in which case YouTube would smash the above record.

    I'm happy FF 3.0 is out and all, but I don't really see the big deal in this number.

  6. ^__^ by WoggyMumma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone make a map like that but base it on percentage of population.

  7. I would call it a sucess.. by Junta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That the actual end users explicitly seek out a piece of software, rather than settle for a defacto standard. Having users because they are too lazy to replace what the OEM gave them is, in my opinion, not as impressive.

    As to the OEMs, there is the possibility of a kickback from MS from using IE exclusively, just like other 'free software', but I would think that would perhaps be too brazen considering the whole anti-trust thing.

    Another possibility is a deep seated fear of distributing open-source software that seems to pervade these companies. Dell at least should be over it since it ships linux pre-installed, but then again, lawyers can insist that though the codebase is the same, they need to be paid to review different uses of it.

    And finally, there is the possibility they believe it really not worth their time to bother. Would you *honestly* choose one brand over another *just* because of firefox being pre-installed, even if the firefox one is more expensive? It would take some work to migrate their crapware platform to make sure things work with firefox that would cost more than zero dollars. Meanwhile, the customers probably aren't looking for that explicitly, since they by and large can just download it truly for free themselves. Pre-install of linux is one thing, it gives an assurance about the hardware choices with respect to linux drivers, but Firefox is just a browser.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  8. Thanks for the arrogance by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If people are still using Internet Explorer, it can only be explained as ignorance or complacency.

    Or personal preference. I downloaded Firefox about a year ago, tried it alongside IE for several weeks, determined there were parts I liked, parts I didn't, and ultimately made the decision that I preferred IE. It's nice to have a choice, and I have made my pick. Others picked something else, whether it be Firefox, Opera, or something entirely different. Fine. Good for them. I don't care because I have my browsing experience the way I want it and that's all I really care about.

    If Firefox works for you, hurrah. I'm not so smug and condescending that I'm going to start calling you names. Just let me have what I prefer and we're all happy. I don't care if you think I made a poor or even stupid decision, in much the same way as I don't care if a Honda driver thinks I shouldn't be driving a Toyota. Isn't that the whole point: for people to have choices and be able to choose what they prefer?

  9. Stats by countries only? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would've liked to see stats per operating system too.

  10. I'm Impressed.... by RobDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FireFox stagged a publicity stunt and a bunch of anti-ms fanboys ate it up like candy.

    First, FireFox asked/begged people to all download on a particular day to break this record. I've never been 'asked' to download any other piece of software on a particular day to break any record.

    Second, what was the existing record? *GASP* you don't mean to tell me there *wasn't* an existing record? Well then....that's not really all that impressive - is it? WoW supposedly has 9 million users, and come patch day they'd all be glad to download files much larger than FF3....oh but that doesn't count because it's a patch? Gotcha.

    So umm, basically, FireFox made up some very specific rules so that they could break a record held by nobody so they can get their name in the paper for something that will say, 'FireFox most downloaded browser ever!' or something.

    Besides which, who exactly was counting the 8 million downloads?

    Nothing to see here, just marketing hype.

  11. lame... lamer, lamest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    MS surely gets more downloads. Adobe gets more downloads.

    Warez downloads over P2P networks don't qualify for Guinness records.