Slashdot Mirror


New Pictures of White Knight Two and SpaceshipTwo

soldeed writes "Over at the Virgin Galactic press site, there are new pictures of both White Knight Two and SpaceShip 2 during construction for media use. After seeing them, I can't help but wonder; Gee, what's in the box?"

12 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. What new pictures? by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't see any dated newer than February.

  2. Re:My 2 cents by emtilt · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's ceiling is actually 110 km, not 100 miles. And 110 km is way lower than where you need to put satellites if you want them to be at all stable in orbit for any long term use (ie more than a couple months).

  3. Seriously - the box by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is just a clamping weight. Used to hold pieces together while adhesives cure or to prevent warping. Normal technique used in composite construction.

    See the other one at the other end of the wing box?

    See all the other, smaller weights?

    Now tell me - you really couldn't figure this out for yourself?

    You need to get out more.

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
    1. Re:Seriously - the box by Da+Cheez · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, AC made a very good point. I don't see why he was modded down for his statement, other than for being anonymous and cowardly in posting it. Wapiti's comment was tad bit obnoxious, though informative nonetheless. I'll just come right out and say it: I didn't know what the box was for either, and I'm glad I know now. There are probably many other people here who didn't know either, but who aren't going to come out and say it.
      Now watch as I get modded down for talking sense.

  4. Not new? by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Informative

    Agreed. I thought maybe these were newly published photos that had been held back from the public for a few months, but I've seen at least some of them before.

    What's new here?

  5. It is weight... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Those boxes are weight... About 15 years back I helped build a very ez (Rutan's design too, btw). Construction was 'composite' materials - a bit of a radical chance from the way folks traditional built aircraft. You cut a lot of foam and put fiberglass and resin on it. The real work was making the jigs to get the right camber on the wings. You had to put weight on stuff to make sure it warped at the correct angle. With some parts, you had to do large chunks in one laying (is that even the right word?) of resin since it makes a stronger bond.

  6. Re:Not really space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The accepted definition of "space" is higher than 100km. So yes, it is space. If you dont like it...well tough shit.

  7. Re:Cool names? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm not saying you're wrong. I'm not familiar with the naval traditions of every country out there. But the US and UK, at least, (And those two have about the strongest naval triditions out there.) have no particular problem naming new ships after ones that sank.

    After the first aircraft carrier iteration of the USS Yorktown (CV-5) sank after the battle of Midway, we named a new one after her just five carriers later (CV-10), and we have a guided missile cruiser in commission by the name right now. Also, the USS Indianapolis was sunk quite famously and horrifically. But we have a 688 class submarine with the name now.

    Sometimes, the best way to honor a fallen vessel, is to continue its tradition.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  8. Re:Not really space by pushing-robot · · Score: 4, Informative

    The problem isn't altitude, it's speed. The SpaceShipTwo will peak at 2600mph, which is in the same ballpark as the SR-71 but only 1/6th the velocity required to reach any sort of orbit.

    It's still a neat craft, but it would need to fifty times as powerful to become a true spacecraft, capable or doing more than popping above the "space barrier" for a few minutes.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  9. Your comment history says otherwise by Mr2001 · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a 49 yo grandmother, c programmer and feminist, I find this offensive.

    Oh, do you really? Just a few months ago, you told someone else to chill out when they were offended by a similar statement:

    I am a grandmother too, and sorry but you are wrong. The truth is, that most grandmothers are not technically literate. I just happen to have a career as a programmer, but I think your being too pc if you think there isn't a grain of truth in the original statement.

    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  10. Re:Death Tube by mosb1000 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've seen a lot of molded plastic manufacturing facilities (mostly spa manufacturers or boat manufactures. . . or custom car parts). They all look just like this because they all do the same thing. They build plugs, then molds, then finished pieces. I don't know why anyone would expect this factory to be clean. They are always grinding and cutting and spraying. It's just not a clean process.

    The important thing is they clean each piece before each step. It doesn't matter if some dust gets into the finished product, because it will be encapsulated in resin. As long as it's not too much, it won't have an appreciable effect. I know it's nice to think that it can be perfect and dust free, but it's just not possible.

  11. Re:Same old... by TriggerFin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have a point to spare, but I've already posted here.

    On a related note, I seem to be getting mod points every weekend... when I have trouble finding things that need more modding than they already have. Too slow, I guess.

    --
    Here's your sig.