Slashdot Mirror


Hans Reiser Leads Police To Nina's Body

jlmcgraw was the first to alert us that Hans Reiser has led police to the location in the Oakland Hills where he buried the body of his wife Nina. (We discussed the rumor that he would do so last month.) SFGate.com reports that remains were recovered but have not yet been identified. Reiser is to be sentenced on Wednesday. CBS5 claims that Reiser made a deal for a reduced sentence, to 15 years, in exchange for revealing the body.

4 of 1,523 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Okay there you go by badasscat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before, though, there wasn't even any definitive proof anyone had died. I thought that was kind of a prerequisite for charging someone with murder.

    Not in any state that I know of. Otherwise, the only thing you'd need to do to get away with murder is dispose of the body.

    Poison someone, dump them in the ocean with a rock tied to their ankle, and poof. No murder, right?

    That's not the way our legal system works. A missing person, another person who was their known last contact, poison residue on their hands, a poison bottle in their possession, a car that's got sand from a particular beach on its tires, clothing fibers from clothing the victim was known to own in the car, receipts for rope, a blindfold and other tools in the murderer's possession, existence of a motive... that's enough circumstantial evidence to arrest and probably convict somebody in any state in this country.

  2. Re:still plenty of doubts about conviction by burris · · Score: 5, Informative

    The term in California is "premeditated" and all that means is that the defendant thought about killing their victim and had time to reflect on that before actually killing them. There doesn't need to be a plan for the murder itself but that would provide very solid evidence of premeditation. When you add up a nasty divorce, the delinquent child support payments, the dispute over custody that led to Nina dropping off the kids at his Mothers house on the long weekend when his mother was going to be out of town, the constant stream vitriol towards Nina coming from Hans before Nina's murder and during the trial, the phone call where Hans basically said he was glad Nina was gone, etc... He compared Nina to the Nazis in an e-mail to her. The jury reasonably concluded that he must have thought about killing her at some point during the long divorce.

  3. Re:Still could be innocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    In a US Criminal court the answer would be: Rarely. Like maybe if the judge and defense attorney were both asleep kind of Rarely.

    A jury given the choice between a greater charge and a lesser charge will almost always convict on the lesser charge. Both when conviction on the greater charge may be more appropriate AND when returning a not guilty verdict may be more appropriate. To the point where a DA with a weak case would LOVE to be able to give the jury a 'middle ground' to compromise on. This is clearly prejudicial to the cause of justice.

    Not to say it doesn't happen but usually a lesser charge will be dismissed in pretrial motions.

  4. Re:Still could be innocent by JNighthawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mod parent down - wrong.

    http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/04/reiser-defense.html

    "Hans and Nina met in 1998, in Russia, when he was overseas hiring programmers. He picked her out of a mail-order bride catalog, where she was advertised as "5279 Nina.""

    --
    Wheel in the sky keeps on turnin'.