Slashdot Mirror


Do Not Call Registry Gets Glowing Reviews

coondoggie writes to tell us that in a recent report to Congress by the FTC, the National Do Not Call Registry got glowing reviews. They seem to be well established now with $21 million in fees in the bank, 22 successful court cases, and an almost 70% approval rating. "In 2007, a total of 6,242 entities paid fees totaling $21,602,003 for access to the National Registry. According to the FTC, telemarketers and sellers can access registered telephone numbers and pay the appropriate fee for that access, if any, through an Internet website dedicated to that purpose. The only information about consumers that companies receive from the National Registry is the registered telephone number. Since the Registry's inception, a total of 18,197 unique entities have paid fees for access to the National Registry. The total amount of fees paid by all entities since the inception of the National Registry through the end of 2007 is $80,629,778, the report stated."

8 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Two problems still by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) Still opt-out style. Unless you add yourself to the list, you are fair game for callers

    2) Still ineffective against pollsters, politicians, and fundraisers

    It's better than nothing, but there are certainly ways to make it better.

    1. Re:Two problems still by lgw · · Score: 5, Informative

      Please use "example.com" when you need an example domain name. That's what it's there for. It's simple politeness.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  2. Re:Pay for access to the list? by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope, that's exactly how it works. The trick is that if they call people on the list, they get fined, so it's cheaper to buy access to the list.

  3. Re:Not the end state by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, they don't bother people on cellphones because it is illegal. It has nothing to do with pricing.

  4. Re:Sorry but the DNC list is bullshit by Madball · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My gf worked for a telemarketer for 1 week before she quit out of frustration. They used a computer system that had thousands of scripted responses for any reason imaginable a person would use to reject an offer. The phone numbers were automatically dialed by the computer and when a number popped up that was on the DNC list you got a warning message on your screen. Of course everyone was told to ignore the message and make the call anyways. We later reported them to the police. Tele marketers can choose to ignore the DNC list.

    And I can choose to ignore stop signs, drug laws, et cetera. It doesn't make the law/list BS (which it may or may not be). The question is how effective is the policing of it--there are no cops waiting by your phone, so the onus is on you to report any violations.

  5. Re:Not the end state by omris · · Score: 5, Informative

    My understanding of WHY it was illegal to bother people on cell phones though was that it costs money to the person you're calling. Unlike landlines which only charge for outgoing calls.

    Like a collection agency cannot cost you money in an attempt to collect what you owe them and likewise can't call cell lines.

    At least that's the way of it in my home state.

  6. Re:Not the end state by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

    No one bothers people on cell phones.

    But people on cell phones bother everyone.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  7. Re:Telemarketers access the DNC registry?? by holmedog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I work for a data warehousing company. Any accounts that we have that still use direct telemarketing campaigns are required to buy the list. It's not that expensive, and it is very nice, honestly. These people took the time to say they won't be buying things from telemarketers, so we know we don't want to market towards these people.