Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.6.26 Out

diegocgteleline.es writes "After three months, Linux 2.6.26 has been released. It adds support for read-only bind mounts, x86 PAT (Page Attribute Tables), PCI Express ASPM (Active State Power Management), ports of KVM to IA64, S390 and PPC, other KVM improvements including basic paravirtualization support, preliminary support of the future 802.11s wireless mesh standard, much improved webcam support thanks to a driver for UVC devices, a built-in memory tester, a kernel debugger, BDI statistics and parameters exposure in /sys/class/bdi, a new /proc/PID/mountinfo file for more accurate information about mounts, per-process securebits, device white-list for containers users, support for the OLPC, some new drivers and many small improvements. Here is the full list of changes."

5 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. Clever new tools for kernel config by FeatureBug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What I would like to see more emphasis on in future kernels is a discussion of possible clever new tools and methods for configuring the thousands of kernel config options. None of the existing in-kernel-tree or out-of-tree config tools seems ideal.

  2. Re:Is Linux kernel 2.6.26 == Linux 2.6.26 ? by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Technically, "Linux" is the kernel, and there is no "Linux" OS. Of course, the various distros are generally referred to as "Linux" distros, which really doesn't help matters any. I believe your FreeBSD/NetBSD/etc are vaguely equivalent to Debian/Fedora/etc.

  3. Good point, but... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...if your friend/colleague/whatever wants to use an NTFS-formatted drive on your computer, he might be a little unhappy if you reformat it.

    I put NTFS support on my Linux computers and Ext2/Ext3 support (and a proper formatting tool) on my Windows computers. It's called interoperability.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  4. Re:Is Linux kernel 2.6.26 == Linux 2.6.26 ? by Nutria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I believe your FreeBSD/NetBSD/etc are vaguely equivalent to Debian/Fedora/etc.

    I'm not sure where exactly you're going with that

    What he(?) means is that just as {Free,Net,Open}BSD are complete operating systems, so are Linux distros like Debian, Fedora, etc.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  5. Re:Intelfb still broke by rbanffy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's actually useful if you, for some reason, need to drop to a text console and do something there (like restarting a firefox that started running amok an hour ago and now has all the system resources taken). I like my console to use the exact resolution of the laptop screen so that there are no weird pixels and, as a nice plus, the screen can fit a lot more text.

    Having a 900x1024 screen and a text mode that's about 480x640 pixels and 24x80 is kind of ugly.