Open Source Adeona Tracks Lost & Stolen Laptops
An anonymous reader writes "Adeona is the first Open Source system for tracking the location of your lost or stolen laptop that does not rely on a proprietary, central service. This means that you can install Adeona on your laptop and go — there's no need to rely on a single third party. What's more, Adeona addresses a critical privacy goal different from existing commercial offerings. It is privacy-preserving. This means that no one besides the owner (or an agent of the owner's choosing) can use Adeona to track a laptop. Unlike other systems, users of Adeona can rest assured that no one can abuse the system in order to track where they use their laptop."
it may be more difficult for Adeona to gain traction with non-technical law enforcement officers.
"So who do I call to confirm that this laptop is stolen?"
"Umm, me. You see, there's this free software called Adeona that anyone can set up to track their own laptop."
"Never heard of it..."
In previous threads about stolen laptops (like the AskSlashdot thread on how best to recover a stolen laptop) I read some anecdotes where people were in a similar situation with similarly-purposed software that they rolled themselves. Perhaps the software having a common face (same name and features) will be enough to solve this problem.
Desktop love...
Why exactly would this NOT work on a desktop? Or a UMPC? Or a ULCPC?
Cheers!
Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
Also, what does it do that the following doesn't do in crontab?
1 * * * * wget -O /dev/null http://www.myprivatehomepage.com 2>/dev/null
I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
Adeona is the first Open Source system for tracking the location of your lost or stolen laptop that does not rely on a proprietary, central service.
...Because putting "wget mywebsite.com" in your system startup
script (yes, you can do that on Windows as well, you just need to
download wget first) has sooooo many proprietary,
centralized dependancies?
I actually use something very like that, solely for the purpose of finding my own remote machines' dynamic IP addresses. I don't really see the need for a dedicated "project" to make an entry in your access_log on startup.
1. My brother's alienware laptop was stolen. 2. Reported to the police. 3. Alienware got a tech support call from some guy that bought it on eBay. 4. Guy sends it in for repair. 5. Alienware calls my brother to tell him they have it and only need the police to ask for it officially so they can send it as evidence. 6. My brother tells the police. 7. Police say "huh?" 8. Laptop never sent, buyer never questioned, thief never caught. Similar thing when my sister's credit cards were stolen and used to buy gas at places with security cameras, except then even the credit card company didn't seem to care.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. How many laptops has this system recovered so far?
Also, for a PC, I don't see what this software does that's more useful than the following crontab entry:
That too does a connect on average every half hour, and the IP address and time is being logged.
It does not send any traceroute information (which would be easy enough to do with another half line in the crontab), because doing so could very well be considered illegal black hat activity on your part. Consider someone connecting a stolen laptop to a corporate network. Just because your laptop was stolen doesn't mean you have a right to examining the internal topography of that corporate network, and sending the information to a third party. I'm amazed that the authors of this software are stupid enough to do so!
the common thief already knows that you have to wipe a stolen laptop. Or at least the vast majority do.
When I was younger and dumber I helped some common theives wipe/reinstall. They, like you said, either didn't know the login pw and knew that it had to be wiped to get around that, or they knew that they couldn't sell it at most(not all) pawnshops if they couldn't boot it to to the dtop to show that it worked.
I quit doing it because I came to a point in my life where I had too much to lose to mess with silliness like that. And the happy ending is that I heard thru the grapevine a few months ago that they got lowjacked and caught.
Hmm... the Mac version also snaps a photo with each update. I hope no one is doing anything inappropriate while in front of their computer. Here's hoping that your Macbook isn't stolen by the Goatse guy.
Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
They, like you said, either didn't know the login pw and knew that it had to be wiped to get around that, or they knew that they couldn't sell it at most(not all) pawnshops if they couldn't boot it to to the dtop to show that it worked.
This might argue for creating a passwordless guest account for the thief to use so he doesn't wipe the computer. Assuming that all your datas are well protected-- identity theft could be worse than the loss of hardware.
Anyone have a recommendation for how to sandbox the guest account to make sure it can't do any damage?
Actually CC companies make a lot of money on charge backs. There is an approx $30 fee that goes along with each one and it's for the full amount so they keep there original 1-5% fee as well. As vendors have more charge backs they even up the percentage they pay on all transactions. People with cards and the merchants are the only people that pay in the CC system the banks and CC companies just make money with no risk.
No sir I dont like it.
Listen to yourself, arth1. So if said user connects to uber-secret network, surfs to a web site his choosing, his IP is dutifully logged in the web server logs and the users cookie is logged in the app. So now the owner of the website is liable for having that IP?
Not likely. 1) traceroute is NOT hacker activity. It is a function of a properly working network stack. 2) if the user is connected to uber-secret network and htat network is in the reserved address space (rfc 1918), then the IP doens't matter. What does matter is the need to have one public IP addresses to track, hence the need for a traceroute. 3) traceroute only traces one path out. It does not "map the internal network."
Hell, I'd do it and laugh at anyone who wanted to charge me.
Assuming that I encrypt my hard drive, this software will not work, correct? And if you have a laptop, you really should encrypt it, no?