Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Wins Major Lawsuit Against Bot Developers

Captain Kirk writes "World of Warcraft owners Blizzard have won their case against the programmer who wrote Glider, Michael Donnelly. (We discussed the case here when it was filed.) Blizzard won on two arguments: first, that if a game is loaded into RAM, that can be considered an unauthorized copy of the game and as such a breach of copyright; second, that selling Glider was interfering with Blizzard's contractual relationship with its customers. The net effect? If you buy a game, you transfer rights to the game developer that they can sue you for."

9 of 838 comments (clear)

  1. Proof that Blizzard is the Horde by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 0, Troll

    First they addict you through conditioning. Then your lose sleep playing nonstop for days. Soon you're out of a job, your wife has left you, and the only people who will still talk to you are your guild mates, a bunch of 13-year-olds.

    And now this bullshit court decision.

    This is all proof that Blizzard is actually the Horde. They are evil.

    So uninstall the game, cancel your account, and step outside.

  2. Re:Wow... by LifesABeach · · Score: 0, Troll

    By the ruling handed down inferring that coping a game into RAM is an illegal copy, does this imply that WOW uses only Peripherals, and CPU only? The graphics alone are copied to the RAM on the Video Card. There is a decrease in available RAM when the game is "Loaded". There has got to be to the ruling than this "Copying the game into RAM". What is the outcome of we WOW users when we start using Solid State Disk Drives?

  3. Re:Good News for Blizzard, bad news for copyright by The_Quinn · · Score: 1, Troll
    I don't consider myself screwed over, so please don't speak for me

    I also love Blizzard games, but I don't try and use 3rd party software during the game - so I fall squarely into compliance with their EULA.

  4. Re:Good News for Blizzard, bad news for copyright by icebike · · Score: 0, Troll

    Opera doesn't violate the license agreement by allowing you to run simultaneous copies of the program.

    Try to understand the case at hand. Its not that hard. GLIDE's ONLY purpose is to allow you to run multiple bots by skipping the licence validation code. You are only allowed ONE player per license.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  5. Open source WoW by wi1lyhill · · Score: -1, Troll

    We need an open source version of the client. May be we can decompile it and see what kind of safeguard is in place.

    Bot players help the game by making it more alive and populous then ever.

  6. Re:Not a funny decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Did I hear you say once you were not twitter? You sure don't make much of an effort to pretend.

  7. Re:Wow... by wlilyhill · · Score: -1, Troll

    It depends what the Jews want. The government, congress, courts and most of the lawyers are controlled by zionist Jews. FREE PALESTINE!

  8. Re:Not a funny decision. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    o hai twitter. how's the new account doing? this shilling thing is really not working for you at all, is it?

  9. Re:Good News for Blizzard, bad news for copyright by bzipitidoo · · Score: 0, Troll

    No they can't. They can legislate, brainwash, and moralize all they like, but it won't stop anything. Slow, but not stop.

    We could solve these problems instantly if there was any will to do so. The supreme law is the will of the people. If people wouldn't play along with these restrictions, corporations would have to drop them, Or go out of business. Either way, court decisions on the issue wouldn't mean a thing. On several occasions they have gone too far and been forced to back off not by the courts but by popular backlash.

    Of course, it won't happen anytime soon. Most people don't know or care about restrictions, and some who are aware are sympathetic. They think companies are within their rights to impose restrictions. Will be many years before today's norms look quaint and ridiculously restrictive to the majority, but I think that will eventually come to pass.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"