Slashdot Mirror


Rockets To Race Over Wisconsin Skies

Iron Condor writes with a reminder that that the first race of the Rocket Racing League (last mentioned here in April, after its 2005 founding) is set to take place later this month at Oshkosh AirVenture 08. This race, says Iron Condor, "is exactly what it sounds like: NASCAR 1000m above ground in rocket-propelled airplanes. Created by X-prize founder/CEO Peter Diamandis, this is 'the next evolution of racing' (at least according to the promo video, which is definitely worth watching)..."

12 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. X-Prize? by Dripdry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see where if this sort of thing really took off, the X-Prize interests would dovetail perfectly. If private racing could eventually hold races in low earth orbit, beating governments to the technology, the interest and funding for space could really take off. It's just another way to skin the cat, making money while advancing reasonable interests.

    --
    -
    1. Re:X-Prize? by chaim79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That would be very different (and even more interesting) then what they are doing, right now it's just rocket powered aircraft, to race in LEO you'd have to have some powerful maneuvering jets and a strong control system, and a pilot who can think maneuvering in an airless environment where it's all changing momentum vs changing wind deflection and lift properties.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
  2. Re:Finally. . . by Fizzl · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uh... It's a quicktime mov. I consider that shit far more irritating than flash. Only thing more irritating than quicktime is realmedia.

  3. Re:Oh yeah!!! by Sun+Chi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you are a brave brave man to post without the anonymous box checked.

    Or a woman.

    by snowgirl (978879)

    p.s. NASCAR is stupid and boring.

  4. Re:Oh yeah!!! by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dude, this is Slashdot, not Earnhardt country. And NASCAR does suck. There are much better racing variants available even in the US.

  5. Fuel? by StellarFury · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uhhh... does anyone care about the massive waste of rocket fuel that this is? I mean, that's the number one reason I hate NASCAR. It's just downright wasteful. We could be using that gas, instead of burning it to drive in a circle 500 times.

    This whole auto-racing thing is an artifact of a world where energy is plentiful and can be freely squandered.

    1. Re:Fuel? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhhh... does anyone care about the massive waste of rocket fuel that this is? I mean, that's the number one reason I hate NASCAR. It's just downright wasteful. We could be using that gas, instead of burning it to drive in a circle 500 times.

      This whole auto-racing thing is an artifact of a world where energy is plentiful and can be freely squandered.

      What do you figure the energy costs are to to run an indoor football/soccer/basketball stadium? Or an NHL hockey rink? remember, these all have to be maintained 24x7.

      Not to mention all the fuel used flying all those people back and forth across the globe just so they can kick a ball around or hit a puck with a stick?

      At least there is some technology feedback from auto racing back into 'real cars'.

      What would be the return on investment in the energy cost of hockey? baseball? football?

      How confident are you that NASCAR is actually the most energy wasteful sport going?

    2. Re:Fuel? by ghoti · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This whole auto-racing thing is an artifact of a world where energy is plentiful and can be freely squandered.

      Well said! I completely agree. It's time we move on to a world where it's cool to be efficient and conserve energy rather than blow it out the exhaust pipe as fast as possible.

      --
      EagerEyes.org: Visualization and Visual Communication
    3. Re:Fuel? by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go away, hippie.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    4. Re:Fuel? by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This whole auto-racing thing is an artifact of a world where energy is plentiful and can be freely squandered.

      ...which differs from football or baseball precisely how? Have you any idea how much fuel it takes to get seventy-five thousand people from home to a stadium and back?

      rj

  6. Re:Doh! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Speaking as a European, I have, and really no offence, found US cheese to range from bland for the better stuff, to disgusting for the most mass-market ranges. And the thing you call processed cheese is beyond description all together. I'm sorry, I really am - the people of the USA have contributed to culture and science in many, many ways - but your cheese is the foulest thing that anyone has ever had the gaul to pass off as food. I tried pretty much all of it until I found somewhere that imported proper English cheddar which I bought with great relief.

    I guess it's just one of those things.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  7. Re:Oh yeah!!! by FiloEleven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll take the bait. I'm not a huge NASCAR fan, but my roommate is. "How can an otherwise intelligent young man get so much enjoyment out of such a crappy sport?" is what I asked myself. Part of it was certainly his upbringing - his dad was a huge fan. But you know what? Under the surface, it's actually pretty interesting.

    The issue is that it's kind of like golf, only the people who tend to watch it are larger, rowdier and smellier. Golf is pretty boring to watch, too, unless you have an eye for the subtleties of a good shot or an appreciation for the difficulty of a particular putt.

    If you're watching mostly the track and seeing the cars go 'round to the left, you're going to be bored as hell. If you focus on an individual driver, and watch how he catches a draft off of a passing rival, and you understand that drafting will make both cars go faster (though the guy in front is at full throttle and the guy in back only half), the dynamics of the race become more interesting. In fact, I find the most entertaining part of the race to be how drivers play with the airstream (well, except for the crashes, of course).

    I'm not a fan of Nascar by any stretch of the imagination and will never go out of my way to catch a race. If people are watching one where I am, though, I don't have to play the elitist asshole anymore because I understand that the game has some merits.

    I agree that F1 is more interesting. Autocross not so much. And don't even get me started on drag racing.