Slashdot Mirror


Neal Stephenson's "Anathem" Due In September

Alexander Rose writes "Neal Stephenson's new novel, ANATHEM, germinated in 01999 when Danny Hillis asked him and several other contributors to sketch out their ideas of what the Millennium Clock might look like. Stephenson tossed off a quick sketch and promptly forgot about it. Five years later however, when he was between projects, the idea came back to him, and he began to explore the possibility of building a novel around it. ANATHEM is the result, and will be released on September 9th, 02008." Read Rose's complete posting for more information about the release of the book, which he describes as set "in a genre bending alt-future-retro world where mechani-punk technology meets space opera in a blend of the best of Snow Crash and the Baroque Cycle."

7 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Urgh... by TechnoBunny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "a genre bending alt-future-retro world where mechani-punk technology meets space opera in a blend of the best of Snow Crash and the Baroque Cycle." Sounds horrific.

  2. GAH by _KiTA_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Read Rose's complete posting for more information about the release of the book, which he describes as set "in a genre bending alt-future-retro world where mechani-punk technology meets space opera in a blend of the best of Snow Crash and the Baroque Cycle."

    My god, I've gone cross-eyed.

    1. Re:GAH by jefu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A Canticle for Liebowitz is probably one of the top 20 or so true science fiction classics (as opposed to fantasy or weird) and is worth a read (and a reread).

  3. Re:less is more by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The guy still doesn't have an editor with the balls to say no

    Sorry, no. He's got a publisher with the balls to let him write what he wants to, and willing to sell it to people who appreciate it. I would have missed any single paragraph removed from the Baroque Cycle, and remain grateful that he won whatever stare-down might have been necessary to get an editor or publisher to let him have it his way. It's wonderful work, and if you're in such a hurry to get back to your Wii, just limit yourself to comic books or something you can handle while in the bathroom. I hope that he doesn't give a moment's thought to lightening up. 960 pages? What's the big deal? Maybe for people with gnat-sized attention spans and shallow vocabularies. It's not meant to be fast - his stuff is meant to be savored.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  4. Re:less is more by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Was there some particular need to be a prick about this?

    Maybe not. I guess I'm tired of people who see a long book (which they haven't even bothered to pick up!) and simply default to saying it, or the author, or editor have failed. It's what's wrong with a great deal of our culture these days, and speaks volumes (if you'll pardon the pun) about the diseased state of our collective attention span. It's why people can't get through a two-page science article and draw some useful conclusions. It's why people can't vote sensibly. It's why so much potentially great entertainment - in all media - is chasing its own tail down the drain, searching for the lowest common denominator. Spanking Neal Stephenson and his editors for the length of the Baroque Cycle is to utterly, completely miss the point of that piece of work (and indeed of Stephenson's purpose for writing it and his choice of style).

    I loved Snow Crash, I think there were editing problems all over that thing.

    Yup. Likewise with Cryptonomicon. By the time he got to the B.C., he'd come a long way, I think. Greatly improved. I'll always admire T.S. Elliot for saying, "I'd have written you a shorter letter, but I didn't have time." Brevity - well used - can be a delight. But that isn't the only delight. People who don't like the Baroque Cycle probably couldn't make it through a Dorothy Dunnett novel, either (to say nothing of the series of them needed to actually tell a complete tale). It's a style one likes, or one does not. But not liking something meant to last you through many long evenings of reading doesn't mean that the author or his editor have somehow failed.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  5. Climax without denouement by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stephenson's detractors are just pissy because Stephenson stops right after the climax and doesn't bother with a denouement. They're like women who complain that the guy just leaves them after he's gotten his rocks off, and doesn't stick around to cuddle so they can pick the pimples on his ass while he's dozing.

  6. Re:The only question that really matters by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As for me, Snow Crash is the only reason I buy any of his books.

    I've bought every stinking thing Neal has ever written simply because he wrote Snow Crash, and I have this weird, vain hope that he might again someday write a book even half as brilliant. So I'm out a couple hundred bucks, and have a lot of disappointment sitting on shelves in my library, but I'll likely buy Anathem the day it comes out, too.

    Just in case it's another Snow Crash. Please let it be another Snow Crash.

    --
    John