The First Paper-Based Transistors
Roland Piquepaille found news of research out of Portugal that has resulted in the first paper-based transistors (the original article is less informative than Roland's blog). More precisely, they've made the first field effect transistors (FET) with a paper interstrate layer. According to the research team, such transistors offer the same level of performance as 'state-of-the-art, oxide-based thin film transistors produced on glass or crystalline silicon substrates.' Possible applications include disposable electronics devices, such as paper displays, smart labels, bio-applications or RFID tags. The research will be published in IEEE Electron Device Letters in September.
Maybe they could go with paper batteries? Google "paper batteries" for a hundred other links to the same and related stories/technologies.
A-Bomb
The INTERSTRATE layer is paper now. In a normal FET, the whole thing has a doped silicon substrate functioning as the grid and body, with a (say) metal oxide semiconductor in between as an insulator (interstrate) (MOSFET). They replaced the MOS with paper. It's still a hunk of silicon.
Support my political activism on Patreon.
You error was underestimating the amount of insane people out there with buckets of money, well atleast were the Squba is involved.
"I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
The first transistors on paper have been published in 2005:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/7387872.html
There is also a paper by the same authors, which I can not find right now.
Honestly? It's so hard to tell sarcasm on text only forums... If you really don't get it, and want it explained, please feel free to reply.
Here's a tidbit though for those who agree with you and honestly don't get this joke (are there any such souls on /.?):
Hz is cycles per second, more or less (some will argue that this is not what Hz is - go with this) so if you had TP that moved back and forth at five times per second, what would that mean for you? If you then underclocked it by a factor of ten, you would get a half a stroke per second, which is a little more suitable for the purpose of TP.
Okay, now that I feel like an arse for explaining a joke on /., I hope I didn't really fall for one of the lesser known classic blunders... Queue Wallace Shawn (aka Vizzinni for those who don't know ... losers) jokes here: 5 4 3 2
2^3 * 31 * 647
I really didn't want to know, but the urge to google it was stronger: http://www.i-mockery.com/shorts/three-seashells/