Slashdot Mirror


Speculation On a Second Internet Economy Collapse

David Barrett writes "If you sell three billion ads a month and can't break even, what do you do? Drop prices by 40% and switch business models, apparently. Is this an isolated incident, or does it contribute to the growing pile of evidence that ad inventory is overpriced industry-wide, with Google being the worst offender due to its policy of requiring minimum bids on keywords that would otherwise go for cheap? Check out this analysis on my blog and make up your own mind."

4 of 307 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Wish there was a "Free market" advertising syst by __aarcfd8085 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    as opposed to allowing people to bid on every unclaimed typo and spam the system to hell....

    equally the minimum bid system is common to all forms of auction.

    yes Google are being a bit dodgy in how they manipulate the system but equally they (as the article says) don't want people to know exactly otherwise it makes it too easy for the system to be gamed at which point it looses all possible value. Google ads do well because they are generally clickable - in that you have a good chance of clicking on something relavent to what you searched for - that reputation is something that google understandably wants to protect.

  2. Re:Average Consumers? How about average internet.. by tb()ne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And gradually ads become less relevant.

    Less relevant is fine. But there will be a problem if the ads become effectively irrelevant because there is no longer an incentive for providers to continue supporting ad-funded services (e.g., gmail). I never click on embedded ads (the 3 or 4 times I did, it was on accident.) But I'm glad there are others out there who do hit them so all these free, web-based services continue to operate

  3. Re:Average Consumers? How about average internet.. by Bovarchist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think you hit on the real problem there. It's not that there *are* ads, it's that the ads are stupid and annoying. I'm seeing progress from IBM and some others in making the ads more fun and relevant, but there is still a long way to go. And internet advertisers will eventually have to realize that just because you *can* animate an ad, doesn't mean you *should* animate an ad. I've seen magazine ads for Carlton Draught that made me laugh my ass off as well as remember their name - no animation required.

    --
    Hell is other people's code.
  4. Re:Its all CLEAR... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I hope it does collapse.

    Advertising is a ridiculous basis for an economy.

    Oh, look, I built something wonderful that makes peoples lives better. Everyone wants to participate. How will I ever get the support I need to keep this thing that everyone wants to succeed functional?

    I'll stuff it full of crap that they don't like, and the people who own the big factory peddling the crap can support me. That's a great model, right?

    Wrong.

    I don't know what the exact shape of the web will be when we find the right answer. But it sure as hell isn't this.

    The modern web is like going to watch a show while two dozen ugly people with screeching voices walk the aisles constantly screaming at you to pay attention to them instead. It's shameful to see something with such potential perverted in such a fashion, and if we need another collapse before we get our heads out of our collective asses and fix things, well, it can't come soon enough for my liking...

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth