Slashdot Mirror


Intel Switches From Ubuntu To Fedora For Mobile Linux

An anonymous reader writes "According to a report on heise, Intel is switching from using Ubuntu to the Fedora Project for the second version of the Intel supported Mobile & Internet Linux Project Moblin, citing a desire to use RPM package management." So far, of the various subnotebooks I've been glancing at over shoulders at OSCON, though, most of the ones with an easily identified operating system seem to be running Ubuntu.

6 of 165 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, the fools... by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Informative

    citing a desire to use RPM package management

    There might be valid reasons to pick Fedora instead of Debian based systems, but package management is not one of them. Debian's package management is absolutely superior compared to everything else that I know about out there.

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  2. yum by thule · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ever since yum became part of the standard Redhat distro, I have had almost zero trouble with rpm packages. With the repository aware wrapper on top of rpm, dependencies are resolved automatically, just like apt. With the main repository getting larger and larger, there is less reason to use 3rd party repositories that could lend to dependency issues. The main reason to use a 3rd party repository is to add support for proprietary codecs and drivers.

    There is even talk of removing the rpm command entirely so that all package management goes through yum.

  3. Re:Problems... by Shimdaddy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Stop it. This is a total troll and is 100% FUD. Fedora isn't a "trial" version at all -- it's a bleeding edge distro made for people who don't need commercial-grade support for their distro, but they want a Red Hat based system. Plus, Fedora isn't just "usable," it's awesome. Far from being a collection of bits and pieces, it's a coherent, organized collection of software -- in short, it's everything you expect a distro to be. You should check out: This and this.

  4. Re:Intellectual property issue by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The package metadata does not contain the license beyond whether it's considered free or non-free, however every package is required to include usr/share/doc/[packagename]/copyright with the text of the license.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  5. rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}\t%{LICENSE}\n" by thule · · Score: 4, Informative

    I *think* what Intel wants is this command:

    rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}\t%{LICENSE}\n"

    I didn't know that .deb didn't support this. Can anyone provide a similar dpkg command?

  6. Re:rpm -qa --queryformat "%{NAME}\t%{LICENSE}\n" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There really isn't one. Most Debian packages come from main and are FOSS, so the licensing isn't a big deal. The package does contain /usr/share/doc/$package/COPYRIGHT by policy but that leaves the human grepping around. It would be trivial enough for the dpkg folk to add it but it has not been an issue up to now.