Ancient Italian Walls Repaired With Lego Bricks
Ubuntukitten writes "When some walls in Bocchignano near Roma started to erode, the perfect solution was found in Lego bricks (although some look suspiciously like Duplo bricks to me). FTA: 'At first I thought it would be a complicated procedure to fit the pieces, But as it turned out, the bigger plastic pieces were compatible with the smaller ones, and the Lego held itself in place without any glue whatsoever.' I like the effect. It's like the scene has been created on the holodeck but a few holoemitters are broken ..."
Am I the only one who thinks this is rather appalling? I mean, these are beautiful, ancient relics, now completely defaced.
Guess who makes Duplo bricks
We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
I find this almost beautiful, more captivating than the original wall. Though if it wasn't there to support the wall, I wouldn't like it.
Then it would just be like grafitti, art is relative... changing someone elses property's appearence is not acceptable.
Particles, stuff that matters.
While I don't like the look of mixing the Lego and Duplo with the old architecture, it is an interesting idea. A more structurally sound version of Lego could, one day, be the standard tool for patching damaged walls. If the Lego were designed to be rough on the sides, it might hold concrete render or skimcoat, so the finished product would be indistinguishable from the rest of a rendered or skimcoated wall.
Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
I think it looks neat; reminiscent (to me) of those walls with shards of heavy wine bottles stucco'ed into the top as a makeshift intrusion deterrent. Europe is full of a mix of majestic architecture and ugly-hacks-through-the-ages, reflecting the materials and skillsets available at the time.
"They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
Oh well, at least they can be easily removed.
No shit Sherlock?
"The majority is always sane, Louis." -- Nessus
http://slashdot.jp
I mean, think of it this way: let's say your house showed some signs of water damage, or maybe (minor) cracks after an earthquake. And I come and glue a brightly coloured poster on top of it. Maybe even a waterproof poster to prevent more water getting there. Fine. But I'm guessing most people would still have a fit about suddenly discovering a bright poster on their property's wall.
2. Additionally, I have to wonder exactly how much _are_ they supporting the wall there. I.e., if it even has that excuse.
That looks like a thick wall of rock and brick. Especially the rock part is actually pretty damn heavy. And usually pretty tough too. Plastic toy bricks, not so much.
If the rest of the wall wasn't holding them in place already, i.e., if the weight of that wall was actually resting on those toy bricks, I'm guessing they'd get crushed instantly.
TFA says they're not even fixed there. Oh, and get this, he tried to fix them there with some _glue_, but it didn't stick to the dusty rock. Maybe someone should tell him about cement. You'd think the rest of the wall would be a clue.
So basically it doesn't look to me like it's even actually "repairing" the wall. It's just a bunch of toy bricks that occupy some available space there, but not much more.
I.e., on the whole it helps the wall just about as much as gluing a poster over the hole would.
3. Hmm, dunno, I have to agree with another poster there. I found the original wall much better, in that photo.
You have to remember that those walls are likely there for historical and cultural value. You know, so people can go and look at an example of roman or medieval architecture.
If they just wanted something brightly coloured instead, they could have demolished those old walls and built a McDonald's there.
Even if I might appreciate a Duplo brick construction on its own, and the wall on its own, it's the combination that bothers me.
It's like going to a museum and putting a clown nose, clown shoes and a pink tutu on a suit of beautiful Maximilian armour. The combination actually defaces and diminishes the original.
I don't know, there's something about it that, well, seems to serve no other purpose than to visually scream "look! there's a hole here! they didn't repair it!" Much like writing "WASH ME" with the finger on a dusty car.
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
Most AFOL's that I know would cringe at a chaotic color scheme like that. Sure, some might argue that it's art, but I think there's an at least as strong argument that it's also friggen ugly.
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'
what can I say ... it needs paint.
temporary? but .. those bricks look SOOOO load bearing.
Just wait until the time comes for further repairs and he tries to take the "glueless" legos apart...
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Once again, the power of modern technology triumphs again, and building material like straw, sticks, clay bricks and yes, even gingerbread is shown to be obsolete.
Is this what passes for a decent news article these days? Why is this kid "scouring the city?" Is it a college project? A city request? Boredom? Is it a permanent thing? An art installation? Did cement staop working? What is with the poor sentence structure? This reads like gossip from a disinterested stoner.
Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
How do you know that isn't what actually happened?
Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com