Butterflies lay offspring by the hundreds, have short enough lifespans that selection will take place soon after the event, lack the socializing effects of modern healthcare in humans, etc.
There's no doubt that there were millions of stillborn and otherwise irreparably genetically damaged butterflies already. The question is has it affected the long-term survivability of the species.
If you let all the companies compete for use of the same spectrum, you end up with the problems that lead to the creation of these regulations in the 1920s-- 50kW transmitters and interference for all.
Adblock for chrome doesn't block ads in Flash, doesn't stop ads from downloading (just hides them) and doesn't stop certain javascript-based ad sites (IIRC).
Yes, but Google can avoid the hassle of evaluating on its own whether each video is fair use by just removing the videos WMG claims violate copyright without a double-check.
The problem there is that you're using CGI (which runs a new instance of PHP for each request) rather than FastCGI (which keeps a pool of processes active).
Also you're comparing Apache to a custom written, purpose-built web server. You could probably write said web server in PHP and it would be faster than the Apache/PHP combo.
Slashdot Mirror
Butterflies lay offspring by the hundreds, have short enough lifespans that selection will take place soon after the event, lack the socializing effects of modern healthcare in humans, etc.
There's no doubt that there were millions of stillborn and otherwise irreparably genetically damaged butterflies already. The question is has it affected the long-term survivability of the species.
If you let all the companies compete for use of the same spectrum, you end up with the problems that lead to the creation of these regulations in the 1920s-- 50kW transmitters and interference for all.
Adblock for chrome doesn't block ads in Flash, doesn't stop ads from downloading (just hides them) and doesn't stop certain javascript-based ad sites (IIRC).
Monitoring high-speed digital signals takes special (expensive) test equipment, which even a university lab might not have lying around for open use.
The SNES does not have high-speed digital signals. The whole thing is clocked at 3.58MHz. This isn't like trying to probe a SATA connection.
Youtube doesn't require an actual takedown notice, just a few clicks in ContentID.
Assumes jQuery is built into your browser. That's a stretch.
Software engineering and computer science are two entirely different fields. I don't know why they're combined so often.
If sailboats can travel faster than the wind, of course wind-powered carts can.
Protons don't move at the speed of light.
You can still get satellite there though. To Mars!
By sniffing traffic to determine the existence of your network?
Most ISPs have a clause saying that you are responsible for all traffic using your internet connection.
The MPEG is charging no royalties on web based video.
Yes, but Google can avoid the hassle of evaluating on its own whether each video is fair use by just removing the videos WMG claims violate copyright without a double-check.
No. Google is still allowed to take down any videos they want on YouTube, regardless of their status as fair use.
Has anyone actually written a practical implementation of this in something other than MatLab?
It would take a very unrandom Math.random() for this to happen.
If you RTFA, it says that the app was commissioned by Adobe.
That wouldn't be enough.
Only the stuff that Management is breathing down your back about is put above "fixing the cute intern's laptop"
There are plenty of modern cryptographic systems that could provide offline security, perhaps in the form of a chip.
Unfortunately, credit and debit card systems are not modern.
Windows machines behind hardware firewalls, unfortunately.
The PIII means you set it up recently enough that you could've had it running 2.0. Why do you do these things...
No dc? What kind of Linux is this guy smoking?
Guess what, kids!
A 128-bit code has twice as many ones and zeroes as a 64-bit code. Wow!
The problem there is that you're using CGI (which runs a new instance of PHP for each request) rather than FastCGI (which keeps a pool of processes active).
Also you're comparing Apache to a custom written, purpose-built web server. You could probably write said web server in PHP and it would be faster than the Apache/PHP combo.