Slashdot Mirror


Modern LaTeX Replacement?

javierzinho writes "For many years I have been using LaTeX to compose scientific documents, but truly I am getting tired of its complexity. You have to install new packages for new features, compatibility issues are everywhere, you need to know commands for everything, table composition is torture, image insertion is an odyssey if you don't have the 'right' format, and you need to be a LaTeX Jedi master to create a new document class. I'm looking for a document processor (not a word processor) that is a viable replacement for LaTeX, possessing all of its advantages — consistency between text and math text, automated cross references, direct PDF creation, etc. — but that is not stuck in the 1980s with the compiler metaphor and weird font technology. An application with visual interface and so on. I've tried Scientific Word and Lyx but both are front-ends for LaTeX. Publicon only produces PDF files by exporting to LaTeX and subsequently using pdflatex. Add-ons for MS-Word are a joke, and webEq is intended for web publishing, not for PDF production. Does anybody know of a decent, scientific-structured document processor that is a modern application?"

18 of 918 comments (clear)

  1. Modern LaTeX Replacement? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 5, Funny

    PlAsTiC?

  2. Re:Why latex at all ? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well what's the replacement? Word/Writer are garbage for writing research papers or theses, so what else is there?

    PowerPoint, of course. To handle the math expressions, just use Comic Sans. That makes it look like the math problems were solved with a pencil, the way a real mathematician would do it.

  3. Re:Why latex at all ? by Ira+Sponsible · · Score: 5, Funny

    I asked a mathematician how to solve constipation and he said, "Work it out with a pencil."

    So I did.

    I'm just glad I didn't ask an engineer or I'd have had to use a slide rule.

    --
    1.Netcraft confirms:In Soviet Russia all your base welcomes a beowolf cluster of CowboyNeal overlords. 2.? 3.Profit!!1!
  4. Re:Why latex at all ? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...LaTeX is still the first choice. It is more robust, and gives the user more control over appearance, than anything else I've seen. Kinda like the original post says, if it's not relevant anymore, what's the alternative?

    Polyurethane. A little more expensive, but thinner and hypo-allergenic.

  5. What's next? by mrroot · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next thing you know someone will ask for a replacement for vi.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
  6. Re:Why latex at all ? by duncan+bayne · · Score: 5, Funny

    > LaTeX is hard

    You're probably applying it in layers that are too thick.

  7. Re:Nope. by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Funny

    Typesetting has long since reached its limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Watson Ladd, 21st cent. AD

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
  8. Re:OpenOffice.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where is badanalogyguy when you need him?

    Well, ya see this just like a guy who has got a bitchin' Funny Car with eight cylinders and 500 ci of displacement, cranking out 8,500 hp. The only thing is that he is getting a little nervous juicing it up with nitro and was looking for something with as much performance with less risk of swallowing a piston.

    And then you come along offering a Toyota Prius because it gets pretty good gas mileage and you think it has some pep. Of course you aren't sure, because you haven't actually taken it on out on the highway.

  9. Re:OpenOffice.org by retchdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, really it's called \LaTeX, which renders all in caps with A a raised smallcap; the E subscripted; and the "X" a $\Chi$.

    But who gives a shit anyway?

    --
    "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
  10. Re: karma whore much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I dunno. How many times can one person +5 for saying the same thing repeatedly in the same topic?

  11. Re: karma whore much? by aesiamun · · Score: 5, Funny

    at least 3...

  12. Re:OpenOffice.org by Sawopox · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, this is actually a good analogy to the original problem presented.

    Mod him down! ;P

    --
    [http://it-tastes-so-good.blogspot.com] Are you hungry?
  13. Re:Journals by Chris+Burkhardt · · Score: 5, Funny

    > I use vi+latex to write my papers

    Pfft. It's 2008 now, time to use a modern text editor and typesetter. I recommend vim+LaTeX.

    --
    "And there be unix which have made themselves unix for the kingdom of heaven's sake." - Matt. 19:12
  14. Re: karma whore much? by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 5, Funny

    How many times can one person +5 for saying the same thing repeatedly in the same topic?

  15. Re:OpenOffice.org by mattmatt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will all you Nazis just bugger off? That's right, I'm the Nazi Nazi.

  16. Re:OpenOffice.org by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Funny

    NO SOUP FOR YOU!!

    That's right, I'm the... well, you get it.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  17. Re:OpenOffice.org by no1home · · Score: 5, Funny

    But I thought the Nazis were anti-semantic.

    --
    I hope this comment is well received... I could have moderated instead!

    Persecutors will be violated!
  18. Re:Obligatory missing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, because silicone is what goes INSIDE, latex is what goes OUTSIDE, duh.