Slashdot Mirror


Excerpt From Arthur C. Clarke's Last Work

Ubuntukitten writes "The Telegraph is running an excerpt from Arthur C. Clarke's last work, called 'The Last Theorem.' Fellow writer Frederik Pohl helped out. It's a reassuring chunk of old-fashioned sci-fi, describing an Olympics that's set on the moon. Typically for Clarkian sci-fi, is very much about the practicalities of mounting a Lunar Olympics, rather than any wild fantasy." The excerpt's centerpiece is a trip to the moon that begins with a space elevator ride. The book will be published on Aug. 1.

23 of 118 comments (clear)

  1. Oblig. by consonant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That man is scary-stunning-awesome. If you haven't already done so, go read "The Nine Billion Names of God".

  2. about Pohl by jacquesm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    F. Pohl is one of the great masters of SF, if you haven't heard of him go read 'the space merchants', then check when it was written...

  3. Re:Deja Vu by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sky biking on the moon was mentioned in Rendezvous with Rama. I always wondered if Jimmy Pak, the sky bike rider in that book was intended to be from Sri Lanka.

  4. Can we stage it for 2008? by Lewisham · · Score: 4, Funny

    The IOC should take this seriously. The air quality on the moon is probably better than at Beijing.

    *buh-dum-tish*

    I'm here all night, please tip your waitress on the way out.

    1. Re:Can we stage it for 2008? by Archtech · · Score: 3, Funny

      The IOC should take this seriously. The air quality on the moon is probably better than at Beijing.

      Well, there is certainly less air pollution...

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    2. Re:Can we stage it for 2008? by dwater · · Score: 3, Informative

      I lived in Beijing until last month for several years. The reports of poor air quality are vastly exaggerated. It does get bad occasionally usually due to sand storms (they're bad), but it's not often, IMO.

      --
      Max.
    3. Re:Can we stage it for 2008? by aussie_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I lived in Beijing until last month for several years. The reports of poor air quality are completely true.

      Isn't it fun being an anonymous internet poster?

    4. Re:Can we stage it for 2008? by z0idberg · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the facilities would probably be ready before the London ones are finished.

    5. Re:Can we stage it for 2008? by itsdapead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, there is certainly less air pollution...

      Dunno. It depends how much of the Moon's negligible atmosphere consists of exhaust fumes from Apollo...

      What's the Selenites' record on human rights like? I'm pretty sure they imprisoned Prof. Cavour and his crew without trial.

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    6. Re:Can we stage it for 2008? by Zukix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have visited Beijing but also some remote Northern Chinese cities as well as Mongolia.

      The haze in sky is significantly made from dust blowing in from the Gobi. The sky is hazy even in remote non-industrial areas. The truth is that Beijing is being swallowed by the desert.

      Personally I consider the air better than Tokyo, Bangkok or London but this judgement may be more about sewers and transport fumes than harmful chemicals from industry.

  5. Re:Deja Vu by adamwright · · Score: 4, Informative

    The main character in "Hammer of God" was originally a moon athlete, and the book mentions the eventual establishment of a Lunar Olympics.

  6. Re:Deja Vu by ezzthetic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure you writen other posts describing stories as weirdly familiar.

    You post seems weirdly familiar.

    --
    You know what they say about opinions. They're all fabulous!
  7. Re:Torch run by achurch · · Score: 2, Funny

    How did they solve the technical problem of the torch run? Wouldn't the flame go out without access to oxygen?

    Well, I haven't read the story, but given that they've already solved that problem for humans, it can't be too much of an issue.

  8. Re:Deja Vu by laejoh · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why it's called "The Last Theorem" and a seperate book! Arthur Clarcke had a truly marvellous short story about this Lunar-based sport event which the margin was too narrow to contain.

  9. Trustworthy by neokushan · · Score: 4, Funny

    How can anyone trust ANYONE's writings if they have the initials "A.C."?

    --
    +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  10. Last work? by sleeponthemic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't be so sure. 2pac is still bangin' them out.

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
  11. No, I'm New Here by New+Here · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I'm New Here

  12. Re:Torch run by fbjon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagining a space suit for a flaming olympic torch... I have to say it is the most ridiculous and awesome thing at the same time.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  13. Re:Deja Vu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You sir, are underestimating us. Of course we know about Fermat, we've all studied our biology.

  14. Re:Deja Vu by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nowadays that would be considered milking the cow for all its worth, but it was acceptable for his generation.

    Many writers (even many contemporary writers) create consistent back stories for a given selection of novels. Some focus on one exclusively (e.g. J.R.R. Tolkien's Middle Earth), while others have various contexts (e.g. Robert A. Heinlein's Future History, Lazarus Long, and World as Myth series).

    If the concepts are bigger than can be contained in a single novel, then it is certainly acceptable and desirable to continue the broader story in succeeding volumes. This mode of writing is very common in science fiction and fantasy - and most fans seem to enjoy the continuity from one book to the next (look at the success of the Harry Potter series).

    I think your characterization doesn't encompass the whole story - much like a novel that is a slice of a given world without any reprise - the readers are left wanting more.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  15. Ode to AC by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Informative

    How can anyone trust ANYONE's writings if they have the initials "A.C."?

    You're thinking, no doubt, of Anonymous Coward - but let's not forget the other great ACs of the world!

    There's Armored Core, with its warring corporations and mercenaries in their robots
    There's A.C. Moore, when you need to buy some craft stuff
    There's Art Carney, of "Honeymooners" fame
    There's Alternating Current, which makes it easier to transmit electricity over long distances or change its voltage level
    There's Air Conditioning, which is great on a hot day
    There's AC/DC, who at one point were away but later were back in black...
    There's Adam Corolla, who was funny on "The Man Show"
    There's Ann Coulter, who is an obnoxious asshat (I guess your comment is valid with respect to her)
    And don't forget good old "After Colony", the era of "Gundam Wing"!

    So let's remember the good ACs of the world, too, shall we?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:Ode to AC by neokushan · · Score: 3, Funny

      They all seem different and complicated, I don't trust any of those things!

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
  16. Not a wild fantasy? by Catbeller · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not a wild fantasy? That's why we call it science fiction, or SF, instead of "stuff we just make up". Welcome to SF as it was before the mass market publishers and anime came along. It used to be a bit more rigorous.