Slashdot Mirror


Retroactive Telco Immunity Opponents Buying TV Ad

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "Whether they're mad at the Republicans for creating the mess, the Democrats for caving in, or both, many are still pissed off over the grant of retroactive immunity for spying on American citizens for no reason. And now some of them are trying to do something about it — they're buying an advertisement on cable TV. While it's not entirely clear what good, if any, this will do given that it's too late, at least it's cheap to participate — they're looking for $6 donations. The ideas is that, if more grass-roots groups do this kind of thing, their 'representatives' won't be able to afford to blow them off as easily."

13 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I wouldn't mind doing this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if I wouldn't end up on a spamlist for every new tree-hugging wackjob cause that comes down the pike.

    Because being against telco immunity means your a tree-hugger? WTF?

  2. Bad Ad by wild_quinine · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've watched the Ad referenced in TFA, and frankly it's not very good. The 'pay to get your political ad on tv' is also not some kind of new initiative driven by the getFISAright crew, either. They've just bought into a political ad networking scheme set up at SaysMe.TV

    Frankly it's hard to call this news in any sense, when it can just as easily be summarised as 'Another bad home-made political advert added to a pay-to-play-on-TV youtube.'

    These are important issues folks, but let's not wet our pants every time someone mentions wiretapping.

  3. Re:I wouldn't mind doing this by zwei2stein · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, you will end up on "Affiliates with wabcjok treehuggers, not patriotic, possible terrorist" list that government has anyway. Plus you will be on "funds anti-patriotic organizations" list. That's one hell of skeleton in your closet even if that ad does not get broadcasted (Will some TV station have balls to accept this deal? Most likely it will get stopped on executive level).

    People tried something like this with Samizdat in Communist times: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter_77 It didn't end well for most of them.

    --
    -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
  4. Re:I wouldn't mind doing this by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I AM against telco immunity. I'm against domestic wiretapping. I'm against an administration that blatantly disregards the Constitution and regards everything they do as legal, simply because they are doing it. However, hard experience has taught me that contributing to ANY cause gets me on mailing lists for "similar" causes - whether I want to be or not.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  5. I'm still pissed too. I've left the D party. by maynard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm done with party politics. The leadership of both political parties have shown that they are willing to trade the legal principals of our founding fathers for short-term political gain. The parties have acted to retain their own power and authority at the expense of our Bill of Rights. This is simply unacceptable.

    But the solution cannot be found in insular political organization. That is, organized liberals cannot fix this. Nor can organized conservatives. The only solution here is for the population of liberals and conservatives to realize they have a greater sense of purpose by opposing the GOP/DNC lock on national politics. Political enemies must become friends in order to oust the real enemy of freedom. And they have a lock on all the power the state can muster.

    I sadly believe that our republic has already fallen, and the "great experiment" is now over.

  6. too high a price ? by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is the price of getting put on a mailing list too high to pay for a bit more freedom ?

  7. The gentleman doth protest too much by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    immunity for spying on American citizens for no reason.

    It is neither "spying on American citizens" nor "for no reason." It's pathetic that you've got to make it sound like something more sinister than it is in order to try and scare people to your side of the fence on the issue. If Microsoft had written that article summary, people would be screaming "FUD!"

    The truth of the matter is conversations originating overseas from known or suspected terrorist organizations to their contacts in the U.S. may be monitored. Your chats with Grandma about what to get little Jimmy for his birthday are of no interest to anyone and cannot be legally intercepted without a warrant. Trying to find out what next big operation terrorists are planning against us ought to be everybody's interest, and perhaps it would be if most Democrat weren't afflicted with Bush Derangement Syndrome.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
    1. Re:The gentleman doth protest too much by silentcoder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You are aware are you not that the risk of an American being killed by a terrorist is just about the lowest of all the things likely to kill one right ? Cars kill the most, ciggarettes and burger king are pretty high on the list, PLANE CRASHES are higher than terrorists ... heck SUICIDE is a higher risk.

      You American's kill more of each other every year than the terrorists can pull of combined ! You kill yourselves more often than they have managed to do !

      If I were you, I would stop worrying about a few people whom you think is fighting a religious war (they are not, suicide missions occur in all wars and all religions, you yourselves send your spies out on missions with arsenic pills in their pockets, the Japanese fought you with suicide pilots - and they were of two religions, neither of which promised any reward for it - the 'muslim extremisms' thing is a great big lie which THEY love to tell as much as your leaders love to repeat it) and worry a little more about why it seems that you cannot stop blowing peoples brains out (note: I said nothing about owning guns, I'm in FAVOUR of gun-ownership, for a reasonable value of 'gun' at least - I am talking about what you DO with them, I'm sure if we banned guns you would just end up killing each other with knives so it's probably a different problem altogether).

      Short version: Terrorist won't do anything to you. Other American's are about 500 times more likely to kill you... or maybe that is WHY you are happy to defend the government listening on your neighbours' phone calls without so much as a judicial review ? It's just easier to pretend you fear terrorists than admit you fear the guy next door ? Especially if he has a darker skin than yours ?

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    2. Re:The gentleman doth protest too much by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The truth of the matter is conversations originating overseas from known or suspected terrorist organizations to their contacts in the U.S. may be monitored. Your chats with Grandma about what to get little Jimmy for his birthday are of no interest to anyone and cannot be legally intercepted without a warrant.

      The "conversations originating overseas" were illegal to monitor too! If they're going to break the fucking law to do that, then nothing stops them from doing exactly the same to Grandma and little Jimmy.

      You're essentially saying, "they broke the law, but that's okay because they wouldn't break the law" which is just fucking stupid.

      Trying to find out what next big operation terrorists are planning against us ought to be everybody's interest

      No, it shouldn't! Statistically, I'm as likely to be struck by lightning as I am to be killed by a terrorist. And I'm vastly more likely to die in a car wreck, or by slipping in the shower, or doing any number of other things that everybody does every day without particularly worrying about it. So no, this hysterical, cowardly obsession with the terrorist boogeymen should not be in everybody's fucking interest!

      I'm more scared of the Bush administration than I am of the terrorists. By a wide margin.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:The gentleman doth protest too much by ravnous · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If some government official came up to me and told me they were investigating a suspected terrorist and they needed such and such help from me, I'd assume it was a legit request and comply. I'd also assume that the government was the one who would assume the consequences if the request was not valid and I did something I wasn't supposed to do. If it was Joe Blow coming to me and asking me to allow him to wiretap someone, that's different. A government official comes to your door with credentials of authority. Besides, there was no profit in this for these telcos. They didn't gain anything financially by allowing these wiretaps. In fact, they had to pay their employees to work with whoever was asking for these wiretaps when they could have been doing something to help their company's bottom line instead. To me, this smacks of typical left-wing "All corporations are evil, let's get 'em" mantra.

      --
      When does this happen in the movie?
  8. Re:It's just a bunch of lawyers. by intx13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Left wing leaders don't care about the spying. They just want another set of excuses to try and destroy the American economy even more than all their environmental regulation already has.

    Ah yes, because all those career Democrat politicians are spending their lives working for a government that they are secretly trying to destroy via an economic collapse. Sounds reasonable to me! Seriously, drop the conspiracy theories and realize that everybody thinks they're doing the Right Thing. The problem is that, like practically anybody who has nothing else to do but talk about politics all day, they're idiots and have no idea what they're doing. But there's no vast left-wing conspiracy to take down the American economy.

  9. Correction by crmarvin42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    many are still pissed off over the grant of retroactive immunity for spying on American citizens for no reason

    many are still pissed off over the grant of retroactive immunity for spying on American citizens for no good reason

    Their was a reason for the spying. You may think it was good, most Slashdot members appear to believe that it was not a good reason, but a reason was given (after the fact). That reason being, they were spying on international calls believed to be involved in terrorism.

    I'm not defending the ISP's or the Government, but the original post is misleading IMO.

    --
    Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.-Oscar Wilde
  10. Re:Congress Writes the Laws... by jackbird · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Usually law enforcement grants a person or entity immunity in order to get them to name names and enable prosecution of folks higher up the food chain. Granting unconditional immunity is nothing more than a cover-up.