UK Hacker Loses Extradition Appeal
the4thdimension writes "A UK man, accused of breaking into US Pentagon and NASA computers in March 2001, lost an extradition appeal that would have freed him, or at least had him tried in the UK. While the US accuses him of causing over $900,000 in computer damage, his attorney asserts that, if extradited to the US, he faces harsh penalties that are "intolerable" and '...the British government declined to prosecute him to enable the U.S. government to make an example of him.' He intends to appeal to the European courts."
Didn't he just use Microsoft's Remote Desktop to "hack into" those systems?
Palm trees and 8
Aliens as a defense? Why didn't I think of that?
But we've got to come down hard on people breaking in to Pentagon computers. Otherwise the WOPR is at risk!
If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
This story has been in the British press for a few days, and I find the whole thing disgusting. As mentioned elsewhere, the $900k was the cost of securing these systems after this guys just walked in with default windows passwords...
I wish I could do that... I'd build a quick frame with a roof and move in my furniture and appliances. Maybe even put up a front door with no knob. As soon as somebody wandered in through my open walls, sue them for the cost of putting up walls and installing locks.
Great business model!
He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
...Your post however does not add any value. People bitching about how a comment was rated are pathetic and makes me want to put a gun in my mouth. How can you have so little meaning in your life that you could possible even think of writing something of so little value...
Mod parent Insightful!!! =)
He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
Anyway, this nonsensical BS should be rejected by the European Court of Justice. Unlike the US Supreme court, it's not stacked with crypto-fascists like Antonin Scalia.
Crypto-fascists? I mean, sure, everyone who has one jealously guards their GPG/PGP private keys to prevent misuse and impersonation, but what does Scalia do that takes him to an extreme in his key management?
Anyway, this nonsensical BS should be rejected by the European Court of Justice
That's probably why the UK government folded to the yanks on this. Why p1ss off the yanks when the French are dying to do it for you?
You thought you could break the laws of physics without paying the PRICE?