Slashdot Mirror


Blizzard Tries To Forbid Open Sourcing Glider

ruphus13 notes a new development in Blizzard's case against MDY, which we discussed last week. Blizzard, the maker of World of Warcraft, has now requested another injunction — to prevent the open sourcing of Glider code. Quoting: "Blizzard has asked the court for a relatively unconventional order prohibiting MDY from making the source code for its MMO Glider software available to the public, and prohibiting MDY from helping people develop other World of Warcraft automation software. Blizzard had previously asked the court to shut down MDY's WoW operations in its motion for summary judgment, but the court's summary judgment order did not address Blizzard's request. Blizzard's requests to prohibit open-source release of MDY's software and prohibit MDY's assistance in development of independent WoW bots are new to this motion — and seem likely to raise eyebrows in the open source and digital rights advocacy camps."

17 of 638 comments (clear)

  1. I have a solution.... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

    OOPS! we were hacked! our source code was stolen!

    OMG!! It's all over pirate bay! sorry!

    In other words, legally say "Blizzard.... Go To Hell."

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I have a solution.... by oahazmatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      OOPS! we were hacked! our source code was stolen!

      OMG!! It's all over pirate bay! sorry!

      In other words, legally say "Blizzard.... Go To Hell."

      Except, it's not legal if MDY claims this happens in court, when in reality the story is a bit fabricated.

      Also, doing so before the court has a chance to accept or deny Blizzard's request may not help MDY's case at all, and end up costing them.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    2. Re:I have a solution.... by spyrochaete · · Score: 5, Informative

      How about Blizzard just fixes their software not not allow cheating?

      They do this all the time, and people are often banned for using cheats. WowGlider used to actively probe resident memory for the values of variables but now WoW checks for such activity, so Glider sacrificed accuracy for stealth by only passively watching memory and controlling the character based on various criteria. In the eyes of WoW's anti-cheating scheme, Glider really does appear to be ordinary user input - especially when the user stays at they keyboard, occasionally doing some human-like stuff such as chatting with friends.

    3. Re:I have a solution.... by fortyonejb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem lies beyond your issue of cheating in an online game, which on the concern-o-meter is a lot less important than a company like blizzard getting to control someone else's source code. This sort of precedent could be very scary. Any company that can find a judge who would believe their IP is somehow infringed by other software that is or is not open source could then get control over how that code is handled? no, that cannot fly at all.

    4. Re:I have a solution.... by RobDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh I agree.

      But lawsuits and the government shouldn't be the ones to give you a cheater free experience on a WoW Server hosted by Blizzard.

      Blizzard should be the one to police it's virtual world. Blizzard runs the servers, Blizzard wrote the code, Blizzard collects money from paying customers like yourself who want to play WoW without worrying about other people botting or hacking.

      Blizzard should take an active role in preventing/eliminating things they don't want in their world. If botting is going be against BLIZZARD'S RULES the punishment for botting should be ENFORCED BY BLIZZARD.

      I have zero problem with Blizzard banning me/terminating my account/flagging my CD-Key as invalid if I'm caught violating their rules. Should it be *ILLEGAL* to break the rules Blizzard makes up for their virtual world? HELL NO.

      That's like me making a web forum and telling everyone it's against the rules to post images...then taking to court anyone who writes an HTML book that includes the IMG tag. My rules that I've arbitrarily decided are NOT the law.

      If some guy wants to publish the source to something he wrote, why shouldn't he be able to? Because some company somewhere doesn't like it? That seems a bit unfair to me. I'm sure Microsoft wasn't happy about Linux and the Open Source alternative OSes that exist. I'm sure you could argue that Microsoft's bottom line has been hurt from the OS community *AND* that much of the functionality of the OS communities products are based off of MS Software (Open Office can open .xls files - if not for Excel they wouldn't be able to do that, right?).

    5. Re:I have a solution.... by Some_Llama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Why don't they implement a challenge-response system in-game like a CAPTCHA? Ask the player some specifically worded question about some game event."

      Why don't they remove the obvious time wasting aspects of the game that turn a fun challenge into "grinding".

      go kill this monster, but you are only done with X drops... wtfh?

      I generally enjoy WoW but what really frustrates me are the obvious attempts to get me to play longer and therefore keep shelling out money.. like run over there and kill x monster then come back.. i come back and am given the quest to return to the same exact spot and kill y monster (that i had to kill anyway because he stands right next to X). BOOOORING!

      if they spent more time developing quests (and adding to the lower level quest lines) people wouldn't want to automate their grinding (for an e.g. there is a low level crossroads quest that spawns a centaur attack on a village you have to defend against, makes you feel like you are really fighting "for the horde", lots of fun).

      I'm just getting tot he high level stuff and it seems to be more along these lines.. why they don't try and improve the older work is beyond me.. that's prolly the number 1 gripe i hear about grinding. UGH WC or SFK again/ "can someone run me thru? i'll pay you gold".

    6. Re:I have a solution.... by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's the wrong approach.
      You shouldn't focus on stopping automated game play.
      You need to make changes so it's not more beneficial then non automated play.

      I ahve a programmable keyboard. I don't mean those ones with software running on the machine, I mean a keyboard with memory I can program.
      This is completly undetectable to the computer. I could automate all kinds of things, it's what computers do.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  2. Can they do that? by HaloZero · · Score: 5, Informative

    If the Glider software doesn't contain any copyright infringement (which MDY may be hard-pressed to prove - really, dunno), can Blizzard legally prevent them from Open Sourcing the software? It would seem to me that that's really not going to fly that well.

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:Can they do that? by Alexpkeaton1010 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can do whatever they can trick a judge to go along with.

  3. Blizzard Open Source Cheats/Trainers not a Novelty by c0l0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As I've delved into Diablo 2 once again (after watching the imho downright fantastic gameplay video of Diablo 3) over the last few days, I've seen with some amazement that some of the most widely used Battle.net cheats are actually licensed under the GNU GPL - there's even some kind of application framework for interacting with the game programmatically floating around on the web...
    It's really interesting to see such development, because back in the days when I really was into all that gaming stuff, there was hardly ever a way to take a look how some trainer's/cheat's author does thing XY. Cool, in a way. :)

    That said, I really, really despise cheating in multiplayer games.

    --
    :%s/Open Source/Free Software/g

    YTARY!
  4. wow,big mistake. by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This can not help Blizzard in any way what so ever.

    A) Glider isn't exactly hard to create.
    B) Makes Blizzard look like bullies..again.
    C) Now there are several people who are going to create a clone.
    D) It's impact on the game, emotional views aside, isn't really that great.

    Stopping Glider is a bandage on a bigger issue they refuse to actually address, farming.
    Now, farming isn't nearly as bad as everyone makes it out to be. In MMO's that allowed groups to control areas, it was horrible, but you can't really do that in WoW.

    Here are some thing they could do:
    1) Don't let anyone mine/pick anything that there skill level makes gray to them.
    2) put some random drift into movement.
    3) limit the price you can sell something for on the AH to 10 times what a vendor would pay
    4) don't allow the transfer of more then 100GP a time. Maybe a one time unlimited amount per month.

    All of these would be pretty trivial to implement.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  5. Re:"illegal" open source software by StreetStealth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I presume you do realize Blizzard's banning abilities only extend to WoW and that they can't actually ban you from real life?

    The software was found not to violate any copyrights. It's not illegal. It only violates Blizzard's terms of service. They're free to ban your account for using the bot, but that's all.

    --
    Your mind is clear / The things that you fear / Will fade with how much you / Believe what you hear
  6. Re:"illegal" open source software by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Care to show me how this software is illegal?

    It violates the TOS of another software product. That doesn't make the software illegal. I could write in my TOS that you must not run it on Windows, does that make Windows illegal? I kinda doubt it.

    It violates the TOS of Blizzard to use the software in combination with WoW, which may void your license. But "illegal"? At least be correct with the terms you use, it's not like there's any lack of term confusion in the vicinity of copyrights, we don't need more people contributing to it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. You cannot outlaw bots by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sure, you can ban bots and you can void licenses when you catch someone, but bottom line: People won't stop as long as two criterions are not matched

    1. The game is interesting enough to be played instead of botted.
    2. The game is complicated enough to make botting pointless.

    Why do people bot? Two reasons. First, they're goldfarmers and want to make as much gold as possible without having to do it themselves. And second, some parts of the game are just boring tedium nobody wants to do but has to.

    So what all comes down is time sinks. People want to avoid time sinks. They don't want to sit in one spot and farm the same crapmobs for hours to get their $number $item for $quest. That's boring and tedious. They don't want to farm $mob for gold to buy their mount, that's boring and tedious.

    Give people what they want to play and you have no problem with bots. Simple as that. When you have a problem with people botting through your game, all it says is that you installed something in the game that should keep the people occupied but they generally hate to do it (aka time sink).

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  8. Re:Do it by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not what they did, it's how they did it. It's a damn shame that they chose to use the insane 'copyright on RAM contents' argument. They did have a reasonably legitimate complaint, since (as I understand it, at least) glider causes problems on their servers which they have authority over. Trying to tell people what they can and can't do with their own game installations on their own machines is an absolute joke, but trying to set terms for what people are allowed to do on a communal service with its own rules is fair enough.

    To fulfil Slashdot tradition and make a somewhat clunky and inappropriate car analogy: I can attach rockets to my car and blast along at 300mph on my own land and it's none of the manufacturer's damn business. If I then paid them to take it on their test track which had a rule saying "No rocket cars" they'd be well within their rights to kick me out.

  9. Re:apparently lawyers are running blizzard now by Mortimer82 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    WoW is not all that repetitive, especially considering that the idea is to spend many months playing it between content updates.

    There are LOTS of things Blizzard does to make WoW a lot less of a grind, big one being daily quests, if you don't know why daily quests prevent the grind, then you don't know WoW well enough to be commenting.

    Blizzard also does lots of other things to prevent the grind:
    - Rested XP, while you are logged out, you earn "rest", when you log back in, you earn double XP per mob kill until your rest runs out.
    - When Blizzard introduced Arenas (a competive PvP system), they made it so that consumables such as potions or elixirs cannot be used at all. While this is partly due to balancing issues, it also means that people don't end up farming gold/mats for these potions, because while they can be a huge competitive advantage, they are also a huge money/materials sink when you are using a lot of them.
    - In their upcoming expansion, they are limiting the amount of consumables that can be used by players in certain conditions. For example, you will only be able to use 1 single potion for a boss fight, this will mean that people wont end up blowing lots of potions on a single boss fight. Another example being that you won't be affected by more than one set of Drums at a time, this is also good as right now the top raiding guilds had lots of their members abandon a profession and take up Leatherworking instead. And all this just to get the most possible "power" for their raid group. When you aren't levelling at the same time, getting a profession from 0 to max is exceptionally time and/or money intensive.

    Personally, what I get most out of WoW is the social connection, I tend to use VoIP a lot with my family and friends who also play. WoW is just a place we hang out, it's like a sports bar or something. WoW for me is something I can do to pass the time between work, going out or sleeping. When I am at home and not playing WoW or sleeping, I do other things like read, watch TV, program.

  10. Botting cannot be prevented by TiggertheMad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From my experience as a MMO designer, battling automated play is actually a huge design problem.

    I am a professional programmer, and I would say that it is more than that. I would say that it is fundamentally impossible to prevent botting on remote clients without a client being completely locked down with DRM. And as Microsoft has already discovered, that is a hard sell.

    You have the same fundamental problem that media creators do: You have to give people information, but prevent them from using it in ways you don't approve of. This problem will not go away any time soon.

    The simpler problem of stopping WoW botting is easy. People bot in WoW because 'the grind' to level or gain faction rep is long and boring. Change the game so that people aren't rewarded for sinking so much time into the game. Problem solved.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!