Canadians File Class Actions Over Incoming SMS Fees

dontmakemethink writes "CTV reports that over the last couple of weeks class-action lawsuits have been filed against two major Canadian cellular service providers, Bell and Telus, for imposing fees on incoming text messages. While there has been very vocal opposition to the introduction of the fees, those who cannot change providers due to binding contracts feel the situation is actionable in court. Some of those not bound by contract, such as myself, have given their service provider notice that they will charge the provider for having to contact them to have charges reversed for unsolicited texts. Because service providers are aware of the volume of unsolicited texts, we feel they are liable for the inconvenience to their clients for preventing spam charges, and more importantly under no circumstances should service providers profit from spam. We also feel that requiring us to buy text bundles to avoid the inconvenience of reversing spam charges constitutes extortion. They can charge me for texts when they stop the spam."

Comments

Re:Rather unjustifiable reactions?

[Faylone]

You must have missed where Idle stories can make it to the front page. Welcome to Diggdot.

Re:eat my shorts slashdot !!

[Bloke down the pub]

However, it's unfortunate that we can't take full credit since he's a new immigrant and likely wasn't a citizen yet.

Maybe you read it somewhere else, but the linked article in the Groaniad doesn't say. It also doesn't mention what colour he is, so we can safely conclude he isn't white.