Slashdot Mirror


Chipped Passport Cloned In Minutes

Death Metal Maniac writes "New microchip passports designed to be foolproof against identity theft failed the test when a researcher was able to manipulate one in minutes. The cloned passports were accepted as genuine by the computer software recommended for use at international airports. According to the article: 'A computer researcher cloned the chips on two British passports and implanted digital images of Osama bin Laden and a suicide bomber. The altered chips were then passed as genuine by passport reader software used by the UN agency that sets standards for e-passports.'"

25 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. I want one! by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like one, preferably with a large memory chip added, so I can combine all my fake passports into one.

    Oh, and I'd like some fake passports.

    1. Re:I want one! by fastest+fascist · · Score: 4, Funny

      But many songs can it store?

  2. Re:Um, well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, they didn't make him take his shoes off - so no, I am not surprised.

  3. Why be a hacker... by kale77in · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... when you can be a respectable "computer researcher"?

    1. Re:Why be a hacker... by iveygman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if I get paid at least 1337 dollars a week.

    2. Re:Why be a hacker... by slashname3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And take a pay cut?

  4. Don't worry... by rarel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Captain Hammer will save us.

  5. That's security professional for you, mister! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm head of retail logistics, so I have to get back to stocking shelves now.

  6. Authentication requires ... um... authentication by gavron · · Score: 5, Funny
    If the passport authorities of the world want to authenticate a passport they *MUST* check its signature to ensure it is valid.

    Their outright failure to do so for at least a year for the UK and perhaps many more for other countries means that the digital information is less valid than the information imprinted on the card. Less valid because it's far easier to change, and shows no signs of alteration.

    In other words, countries that don't authenticate, and rely on the digital information alone are *MORE* insecure and open to falsification than those who do authenticate.

    Security: Not a tradeoff of civil liberties, but an intelligent application of a variety of techniques.

    Authentication: When available USE IT, don't just put it off and trust easily-modifiable data. When in doubt look at the printed picture and the text. *THAT* is harder to change without showing signs of alternation.

    Encryption: I guess if they can't get the key database working for simple authentication (or even a #$&*(#$ hash) they're not going to figure out the encryption stuff either.

    Hi Bruce.

    Ehud

  7. Re:Yesterday's News Today! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    This was all over the BBC News yesterday. What took so long?

    Hey now! This is Slashdot. Taco and Neal and the gang were busy confirming every aspect of the story before they posted it to the front page.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  8. Watch what you're doing by ivothamdrup · · Score: 5, Funny

    The tests were conducted by Jeroen van Beek, a security researcher at the University of Amsterdam

    ... and now a no-fly list nominee for engaging in terrorist activities.

  9. Red Herring... by g0dsp33d · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who needs passports to get into a country anyway?

    --
    lol: You see no door there!
    1. Re:Red Herring... by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who needs passports to get into a country anyway?

      Jose? Is that you?

      --
      "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
  10. Re:Yesterday's News Today! by lilomar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't forget the painstaking grammar and spelling checking.

    Plus they had to go through all the archives to make sure it wasn't a dupe.

    --
    The creator of this post (Jacob Smith) hereby releases it, and all of his other posts, into the public domain.
  11. Re:Um, well... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

    -1, Unintelligible.

  12. Re:Um, well... by EnsilZah · · Score: 4, Funny

    Or

    +1, Ready for Academic Publication.

  13. Maybe so. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think he has a future as a management consultant or an adviser in the Bush Whitehouse for the remainder of his term.

  14. Re:Um, well... by jank1887 · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's what you think

  15. Re:Yesterday's News Today! by underworld · · Score: 3, Funny

    If only someone would invent a device capable of automating those tasks.

  16. Re:"Can't find ass with both hands" comes to mind. by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, we're just well conditioned into the response. "Oh, government fucked up? Must be ours..."

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  17. Spartacus Bin Laden by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 4, Funny

    A computer researcher cloned the chips on two British passports and implanted digital images of Osama bin Laden and a suicide bomber.

    So now we can look forward to seeing thousands of people all sporting Osama Bin Laden pictures on their passports. It'll be as fashionable as Che Guevara t-shirts.

    The TSA will love it because they can announce that they've caught Bin Laden every day for the next 20 years, thus justifying their continued existence.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  18. Re:Take a hammer to it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given up hope? It is so bad that I have given up apathy!

  19. Re:Um, well... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

    How about the government leaves us alone and sees to its actual responsibilities and, oh i don't know, obeys its own laws and attempts to embody American ideals?

    With a username like that, of course that's what you would say. Not fooled!

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  20. Re:Misleading info? by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 2, Funny

    No one ever said they were going to have sex with you. Realistically you probably lost your penis in the explosion.

  21. Re:Um, well... by Firehed · · Score: 4, Funny

    What the hell is this, Schrödinger's Mod Point?

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?