Slashdot Mirror


Air Traffic Controller Lands Stricken Plane By SMS

There's a new reason to hope that the no-cell-chatter bill now under consideration in the US doesn't bring with it a Faraday-cage mandate, and that reason is landing safely. Reader ma11achy writes with an excerpt from a scary story (with an SMS-based happy ending) from the Irish Times: "Five people on a flight from Kerry to Jersey received mobile phone text instructions from a quick-thinking air traffic controller when he guided them in to a safe landing at Cork, after the plane lost all onboard electrical power, communications and weather radar soon after take-off from Kerry airport."

8 of 177 comments (clear)

  1. Oh dear by i_liek_turtles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hay r u ok 2 land lol?

    1. Re:Oh dear by FinchWorld · · Score: 5, Funny

      BRB, cnt talk, crshing.

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  2. Re:Why didn't he just call them? by BAKup · · Score: 5, Informative

    Because cellphone voice communications requires a constant link between the cellphone and the tower, where SMS is transmitted in bursts when the cellphone and the tower can hear each other.

    You'll find in situtations where the cell towers are jammed with calls of people calling each other to see if everything is OK after a major storm, a SMS will get through even if you can't make a call.

  3. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1 - People have an annoying habit of yelling into their cellphones for no good reason.

    2 - Maybe you don't hear complaints about people on cell phones in restaurants because you're too busy yelling into your cellphone.

    3 - Passengers are packed pretty tightly into those airplanes.

  4. "landing safety" -- bullshit by 1u3hr · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Timothy (The "editor") wrote "There's a new reason to hope that the no-cell-chatter bill now under consideration in the US doesn't bring with it a Faraday-cage mandate, and that reason is landing safely."

    How about reading TFA: "the twin-engined Piper plane ... with four passengers". It wasn't a fucking jumbo jet. That kind of plane is never going to be affected by any "no cell chatter" rules, much less have any "Faraday cage" built into it. And I think an airliner would have multiple multiple communications backups.

    Reminds me of the wackos who say cell phones should be allowed in cinemas "in case of terrorist attack".

    The only reason Timothy linked this with the cell phone ban on passenger planes is that it is guaranteed to start up a multi-page thread arguing that subject again, reardless of its irrelevance. Too bad he couldn't think of a way to get gun rights or evolution into the story too.

  5. Re:Why didn't he just call them? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Informative

    What would make a phone lose audio but not SMS ability?

    Shite signal. An SMS is sent in a single frame of GSM data. Audio needs 50 frames per second.

  6. Re:Why didn't he just call them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They can also start recruiting air traffic controllers right out of junior high school.

    "U r clr 4 laning lol"

  7. Non-Story by tweak13 · · Score: 5, Informative

    So a 4 passenger light aircraft landed with no electric power. Big whoop. Electrical failure on an aircraft like that means the radios go out, you lose a couple instruments, and that's it. Most of the important instruments for maneuvering are either powered by the pitot static system or an engine driven vacuum pump. Speaking of the engines, their ignition systems are powered by a fully redundant engine driven system and don't require any external electric power.

    If the pilot wouldn't have had the cell phone, he would have been given signals from a light gun as he approached the airport. Losing radios isn't exactly all that uncommon, especially in older aircraft, so pilots and controllers have come up with ways to handle the situation.