Slashdot Mirror


Inferring Personality From Email Addresses

paleshadows writes "Three researchers from the University of Leipzig published an interesting paper titled 'How extroverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses' (PDF). From the abstract: 'Email addresses represent the thinnest slice of information that people receive from one another. Using 599 e-mail addresses of young adults, their self-reported personality scores and the personality judgments of 100 independent observers, it was shown that personality impressions based solely on e-mail addresses were consensually shared by observers. Moreover, these impressions contained some degree of validity. This was true for neuroticism, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and narcissism but not for extroversion."'

3 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Everyone thinks I'm gay when they see my email by Verteiron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't worry, it has a different meaning here, too.

    --
    End of lesson. You may press the button.
  2. Re:German humour by k2r · · Score: 4, Informative

    I still feel insulted a little when I read things like these. While I agree on German humour being kind of special I think that it has some very funny ways. For example we have a sense for the humor of very elaborate and absurd situations - for absolutely no reason.
    Have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vicco_von_Buelow or some of his work at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70Dd5dosUhk or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rypULAp99ao or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVCk8Inkav4

    The English have a humour that quite sometimes is similar to aspects of our humour, neither nation would admit it, of course.
    Proof: Watch http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=9105942950207814319

      for example.

  3. Re:When reading this... by yali · · Score: 2, Informative

    "This is no science. It is only the hope of a science." - William James, The Principles of Psychology, 1890

    There, fixed that for you. And seeing as how James is generally credited for establishing the field of psychology in America, I think he can be forgiven for limiting himself to some cautious optimism.