Slashdot Mirror


Strange Ubuntu/Vista Compatibility Bug, Solved

Walter Vos writes "Since I've been running Vista and Ubuntu in dual boot with a shared FAT32 partition for my personal folders, I've been seeing some strange compatibility issues between these two operating systems. Somehow Vista locks the folders on the FAT32 partition that are used for folders like Documents, Downloads, etc. A blogpost I wrote gives a detailed description of the problem and a fix for it."

12 of 140 comments (clear)

  1. Re:FAT32 by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ntfs-3g worked pretty well for me, except for I/O intensive applications. aMule with all its I/O on a NTFS partition of VMware with all the virtual machine's file on a NTFS partition as well were pretty slow. Actually I think VMware was so slow that 99% of the CPU was actually taken up by ntfs-3g, meaning VMware was crawling.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  2. Re:As my grandmother used to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I thought was supposed to be "red and green should never be seen?"

  3. Re:FAT32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I know they're only ext2 drivers. Of coarse, you can usually mount ext3 as ext2 without any issues.

  4. I suspsect that... by Psychotria · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if the owner/group permissions were set properly in fstab an easier solution would prevail

  5. Linux newbie finds FAT32 file perms don't work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... gets page linked from slashdot.

    Well, at least I adblock.

  6. Just Delete The Egomaniac. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hmm, I'm having a problem with permissions between Vista and Ubuntu. What should I do?

    Adopt a philosophy of ideological inflexibility, intolerance, ignorance, immaturity, and narcissism?

    ...or...

    Run a shell script or two?

    Decisions, decisions...

  7. Re:you are hollow, by grantek · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's lame because games should work under linux. It's not necessarily you being lame, it's either game developers being lame by not porting their games, Windows being lame that it's hard for the Wine crew to implement it with the exactness needed for games, or both, if the lame games are using bits of Windows that are lame when stuff like OpenGL could help.

    It's lame that people feel like they're being held hostage by an operating system that they don't otherwise want, and it's lame that MS is making money off that. If you actually want Windows for one reason or another, then it's not lame at all.

  8. Re:FAT32 by kiddygrinder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ext2 works pretty well for ext3 drives so they don't care enough to do it. Anyone who does care about ext3 that much i'd guess probably doesn't care that much about windows.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  9. Lack of Free (or even shared-source) drivers by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not necessarily you being lame, it's either game developers being lame by not porting their games

    Up until very recently, it was also video card manufacturers being lame by not making OpenGL drivers for Linux that the community can help debug. But ATI, one of the two makers of chipsets for video cards,[1] plans to stop being lame. And some people would claim that it's distribution maintainers being lame by not providing more thorough binary compatibility across multiple families of GNU/Linux distributions. ("What's an LSB again?")

    [1] Intel GMA is not available on a card.

  10. Re:IFS Kit; Vista 64 Test Mode by ozphx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least $200! Thats almost two developer hours of money!

    Pretty certain you can chuck whatever cert you want in the trusted root store / disable this behaviour.

    --
    3laws: No freebies, no backsies, GTFO.
  11. Re:IFS Kit; Vista 64 Test Mode by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At least $200! Thats almost two developer hours of money!

    In what city of what state/province of what country?

  12. Re:FAT32 by RupW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These are the file attributes FAT knows:
    - Read
    - Write
    - System

    No, it's

    • r - read only
    • a - archive (set when the file is modified, i.e. can use as a simple 'needs backup' flag)
    • s - system
    • h - hidden