Slashdot Mirror


Photographers Face Ejection Over Lenses

destinyland writes "Zooomr CEO Thomas Hawk was ejected from a San Francisco art museum because the security guard apparently thought his expensive camera could be used to spy on female employees. Another photographer notes that 'many people consider a professional-looking camera a threat,' and the state of California has even passed a law against telephoto lenses being used to intrude on celebrities' private lives. Hawk is routinely confronting security guards who argue that photographing their buildings represents a 'security threat.' Ironically, four weeks ago while attending Microsoft's Pro Photo Summit, he was told he couldn't even photograph the lobby of a Hyatt Hotel."

5 of 743 comments (clear)

  1. Amusing by db32 · · Score: -1, Troll

    This type of thing is relatively amusing to me.

    1. How dare they stop us from taking photographs of public places! Censorship!
    2. How dare they take pictures of us in public places! Privacy, Police State!

    Choose one.

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
  2. Re:like they can't get the info by QuantumG · · Score: -1, Troll

    Everyone over 30 has a family lawyer.. otherwise you're just a smuck.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
  3. DON'T CLIKC THE LINKS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    sfist is a fisting site. For those that don't know (I wished I didn't), fisting involves shoving your arm up another dude's asshole, or vice versa.

  4. Re:Freedom to take pictures in public spaces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's not entirely true. I know that in New York you are NOT allowed to take pictures of other people without their consent.

  5. Re:Freedom to take pictures in public spaces by ChameleonDave · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wouldn't that depend on if you are vacationing in Orlando vs Kabul or Baghdad? ;)

    Ouch, that's harsh. Not all Americans are terrorists just because the government is.