Slashdot Mirror


People On No-Fly List Can Sue In District Court

I Don't Believe in Imaginary Property writes "According to a new ruling, those put on the No-Fly List can challenge their inclusion in federal court. Previously, they had to go directly to an appellate court, which would deprive them of any chance to subpoena documents or witnesses and make gathering evidence difficult or impossible. Knowing the government, they will get around this by creating a 'No-Sue' list and making it even harder to change your name."

14 of 241 comments (clear)

  1. Tried to RTFA... by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Informative

    ... but broken link. It looks like some helpful filter somewhere replaced a double hyphen with a dash. Article here.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  2. CNN link to someone doing it. by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:CNN link to someone doing it. by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 5, Funny
      The best part of that article:

      Besides the airline pilot, there's the James Robinson who served as U.S. attorney in Detroit, Michigan, and as an assistant attorney general in the Clinton administration; and James Robinson of California, who loves tennis, swimming and flying to the East Coast to see his grandmother.

      He's 8.

      The third-grader has been on the watch list since he was 5 years old. Asked whether he is a terrorist, he said, "I don't know."

      The list clearly works! He doesn't know whether or not he's a terorrist!

    2. Re:CNN link to someone doing it. by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't think you understand the whole principle of slipping peoples names on the list and not bothering to differentiate between different people having the same name. Don't show the proper respect, fail to agree with the weasel in chief, join the wrong political party, write comments on forums that challenge the government approved view and you will just have to expect limitations being placed upon you, 'er', not you, your name, 'er', not your name, some bad person who has the same name but that they won't identify for security reasons.

      The crazy principle is, by their logic you are not proving who you are, you are proving who you aren't. Now if that other person is such a threat that under no circumstance should they be allowed to board a plane etc. then why aren't they keeping track of their location sufficiently well to know that they are not at your current location attempting to board a plane.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  3. What's this feeling I'm having? by BitterOldGUy · · Score: 5, Funny
    That notion struck Chief Judge Alex Kozinski as nonsensical....

    The appeals court, overturning the lower court, is also allowing Ibrahim to sue Bondanella personally. She alleges that his order to detain her violated her constitutional rights, since the no-fly list is not a list of wanted terrorists, but rather a list of people suspected of being too dangerous to board a plane.

    Could it be? No! It can't be!!

    Why, I'm starting to have faith in the system again! I better turn off my internet connection, my TV, and cancel my Economist subscription before the feeling goes away!

  4. Let me see if I got this stright... by SplinterOfChaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, you get on this list that says you're such a threat to the nation, we don't want you flying planes, and we do this without permission because this guy's DANGEROUS. Yet, they're so little a threat that a court case can get them off the list.

    And who said there are no good comedians in the US?

  5. dance off by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was put on the no fly list when I challenged some guy to a dance off and got served.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
  6. Re:A Big Problem by Ihlosi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What next, national gun ownership registration lists?

    No, no, people are brainwashed enough to think that if they can still have their gun, they're not living in a totalitarian state.

    You don't need to take people's guns away if you've already poisoned their minds with your crap.

  7. Re:Time To Push Back on the Bastards! by stephanruby · · Score: 5, Informative

    Finally, the US Courts are getting wise to the abuses we Americans have been subjected to in the name of battling terrorism.

    Hopefully, this will come in time for this commercial pilot, he has 15 days to get off the no-fly-list -- or he's going to lose his job.

  8. Terrorism? This stuff is cake compared to before by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sorry, but the no-fly list is nothing compared to the forfeiture laws that were passed in the 80s where it has become the norm to sue the property instead of the person owning it in order to circumvent the Constitution and laws protecting person and property.

    People act as if anti-terrorism laws infringing on our rights is something new cooked up by Bush and Co. but the fact is we have had a steady erosion of our rights ever since the the New Deal getting far worse with Nixon's War on Drugs which has been perpetuated by each following administration. Hell Clinton went so far as to make it a Cabinet position.

    The government has show increasing disregard for the rights of people and when the law proved to be insurmountable they invented new means of accomplishing the same (look up asset forfeiture) Sometimes the good guy wins ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USA_v._$124,700 ) but the fact that there are judges who think otherwise is scary.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  9. Totally Pointless by jmpeax · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wow, and to think that the whole thing is totally pointless with regard to its supposed necessity for anti-terrorism purposes because it's actually trivial to get around:

    Denise Robinson says she tells the skycaps her son is on the list, tips heavily and is given boarding passes. And booking her son as "J. Pierce Robinson" also has let the family bypass the watch list hassle.

    Capt. James Robinson said he has learned that "Jim Robinson" and "J.K. Robinson" are not on the list.

    Terrorist's wouldn't even need to use fake names! They'd just need to abbreviate their real ones.

    What a sad state of affairs.

  10. Re:Of course. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gotta love the government being immune to anybody on American soil suing them.

    But the government is not immune to being sued. Suing the government is a Constitutional right and a favorite American pastime! Furthermore, any creation of 'No Sue' list as mentioned would be a violation of your Constitutional right to petition the government for a redress of issues.

  11. It's Downhill from Here by Vengance+Daemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our enemy has become, not the Muslim fundamentalists, but the federal government of the United States. We are spending a lot of time and bandwidth talking about and complaining about their actions. There is kind of a resigned tone to many of the comments that I hear and read. The US government has become sort of not "of the people, by the people, and for the people," but more "against the people." The corruption in congress and the White House is not helping at all.

  12. Re:Terrorism? This stuff is cake compared to befor by Akita24 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Waaaa, waaaaa, the govenment, waaaaa. Suck it up. TheGovernment, at least so far, was put there by you, me, and the asshole sitting next to you who wouldn't know a real issue from the drivel he was told to care about by Fox, CNN or his f'ing priest. Maybe if half as many of the proles who vote for American Idiot^h^h^hIdol would quit crying about TheGovernment and go f'ing vote for something that actually matters, we wouldn't be in this hole. Next time you want to whine about TheGovernment, I suggest you look in the mirror and/or at the asshole sitting in the cube next to you at work. This mess is collectively Our fault.