Microsoft Applies For Patent On Private Browsing
PhilDEE writes "Microsoft is in the process of applying for two patents for a private browsing mode in their next version of Internet Explorer — a feature already present in Safari, among other browsers."
They aren't patent applications, they're trademark applications. Check the source
BIG difference.
Patents==Bad and subject to prior art.
Trademarks==Good, and not subject to prior art.
This is all wrong. Microsoft did not apply for patents, they applied for trademarks for the names they're giving the features, namely "ClearTracks" and "InPrivate". Unless you can find existing use for those names in privacy software you're not likely to find any objections to the trademark applications. Trademarks are not a claim of invention and in no way prevent others from implementing the exact same ideas or algorithms. They're simply a claim to a name in a specific context.
Even the original blogger got it right:
http://www.istartedsomething.com/20080820/microsoft-hints-private-browsing-feature-ie/
I don't expect Slashdot to actually fix the summary, though. The word "patent" will generate a lot traffic, whereas everyone will simply yawn over "trademark".