Slashdot Mirror


DNA Bar Coding Finds Mislabeled Sushi

Hugh Pickens writes "The NY Times reports that Kate Stoeckle and Louisa Strauss, who graduated this year from the Trinity School in Manhattan, took on a freelance science project to check 60 samples of seafood using a simplified genetic fingerprinting technique called DNA Bar Coding to see whether the fish New Yorkers buy is what they think they are getting, and found that one-fourth of the fish samples with identifiable DNA were mislabeled: A piece of sushi sold as the luxury treat white tuna turned out to be Mozambique tilapia, a much cheaper fish that is often raised by farming. Roe supposedly from flying fish was actually from smelt." (More below.) "Seven of nine samples that were called red snapper were mislabeled, and they turned out to be anything from Atlantic cod to Acadian redfish, an endangered species. The project began over dinner with Stoeckle's father, a scientist and early proponent of the use of DNA bar codings. Instead of sequencing the entire genome, bar coders examine a single gene. Dr. Stoeckle said he was excited to see the technology used in a new way and compared the technique to GPS. 'The smaller and cheaper you make something,' he said, 'the more uses it has.'"

13 of 285 comments (clear)

  1. So..?? by FredFredrickson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What are you going to do? Please, don't waste your research and not.. report these! I want a certified sushi organization. There's money to be made!

    --
    Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    1. Re:So..?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fraud is no part of a free market and does not deserve any protection.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:So..?? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is illegal to mis-represent items for sale. You want more legislation than that?

      How about enforcement? I'm not going to perform random DNA samples on my food. But I still expect to be sold what it says on the label/menu, so someone has to do that verification.

    3. Re:So..?? by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fraud falls under criminal law so yes, it is the govt's job to police that. A fraudulent label waiting for someone to fall for it is no different from a fraudster standing at a street corner looking for a suitable mark, except it's much easier to prove that there was intent to deceive with the label.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    4. Re:So..?? by interactive_civilian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So says Arterion:

      Exactly! Who cares what is it as long as it tastes good. This is snobbery at its finest.

      So, you don't mind being charged double or triple the cost of something because it is labeled as something more expensive? As long as it tastes good, that isn't a issue for you?

      --
      "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    5. Re:So..?? by Walkingshark · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, for example, if someone slips some corn product into a food product and doesn't put it on the label because "buyer beware" then when I, a person with an allergy to corn, eats it and gets sick/dies, guess I'm just SOL? I guess so, in your world. I guess it would also be ok for me to pop your head like a melon from 1000 yards and then take all your stuff, since you're so against government regulation of private behavior.

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
  2. Big Surprise by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is anyone really surprised that a business is selling cheaper fish off as a more expensive one.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
    1. Re:Big Surprise by the_humeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's interesting is that it actually takes a DNA test to determine this. For the most part, people can't taste the difference between these fish. So, in these high-end restaurants, you're really just buying into an illusion. I wonder if foodies and other food connoisseurs would be able to tell the difference.

    2. Re:Big Surprise by illegalcortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, yes and no. With any dish, ingredients are going to vary in quality and the cooking/preparing will also vary. So you go into a restaurant, order Red Snapper and after eating it you thought it was just OK. Maybe the chef didn't know what they were doing. Maybe that particular fish just wasn't a good specimen. Maybe it's been frozen a bit long. Maybe it's a bit past the sell by date.

      Or maybe it's not Red Snapper.

      In my personal experience, I've had really good Red Snapper, and I've not so good Red Snapper. Was the difference because of the former factors, or because of the latter? Not having a raw sample and a DNA test, I couldn't tell you for sure.

  3. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, what are the Japanese names of the fish in question?

    After all, the North American "Trout" is really closer to a salmon than the European "Trout". A North American "Bass" is really just a big sunfish. People came over here and used the old fish names for critters of similar size and habits.

    The "Chilean Sea Bass" was a deliberate renaming of the Patagonian Toothfish to have a more commercially desirable name.

    So, all in all there are at least five different distinct families of fish that are called "bass".

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  4. Re:Economic Incentive to Mislabel? by Amouth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    you can tell the diffrence by looking at it and touching it. (you can tell through gloves or thin plastic)

    if you work with fish enough - you should be able to tell what fish you are working with by just looking at it and maybe touching it.

    while i wouldn't know some exotic south specific fish - any that are found off NC i could identify quite easily - then again i used to work at a fish mart. and fished alot growing up.. so i was exposed to it.

    i would expect any sushi chef worth a damn to be able to do the same for what he is serving.

    and as for the diffrense between kobe beef and normal stuff you get.. again you can tell the diffrence by just touching it - if you know what your are looking for

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  5. Re:seems to be common by lgw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course some people who have never known good sushi (east coasters) would have no idea what to expect. Maybe the people who frequent these places simply have no idea what the correct fish is supposed to taste like.

    It's charming the way that West Coasters, especially Californians, imagine they have better food than other regions. Dead wrong, but charming.

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  6. Re:sushi, sashimi by ari_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only that, but can't sushi also contain cooked fish? That said, when the article talks about one quarter of fish with identifiable DNA, it seems obvious that he's not taking DNA from cooked seafood or from rice.