Slashdot Mirror


The Best Gaming PC Money Can Buy

SlappingOysters writes "Gameplayer has gone live with their best PC hardware configurations for Q3 2008. They've broken it into three tiers depending on the investor's budget. And while the prices are regional, it is comparative across the globe. 'In order to play these slices of gaming goodness, you're going to need a decent rig, and we sent our PC hardware guru in search of maximum frames in maximum detail, but at a minimum cost. We have three tiers for the three levels of PC gamers out there and all the detail you could possibly want on where, why and what to buy. So choose your poison and get amongst it.'"

5 of 417 comments (clear)

  1. $10K US for a gaming rig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only a fool would spend that much money on something that will cost 1/3 that in 18 months.

  2. Just another hardware guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So hardware guides are post worthy now?

    Then let me submit the Ars System Guide ... every time they update it!

  3. Re:The investor's budget? by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      investment
                  n 1: the act of investing; laying out money or capital in an
                            enterprise with the expectation of profit

    No. No it is not. And every computer and used car salesman that refers to the purchase of something guaranteed to decrease in value over time should be sued for false advertising.

  4. Re:The investor's budget? by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How would buying a screaming fast computer for work make my job any more profitable?

    Depends on what you do. For a 3D artist, for example, a faster machine means shorter rendering times. This creates less downtime, moves the design-render-refine cycle faster, and also opens more possibilities to allow the client to tweak the final product with you.

    For a coder who's working on a massive code base, we're looking at shorter compile times. Cutting compiles from 4 hours to 1 is a pretty significant gain that will likewise see a rise in productivity. Having a blazing server-class workstation also allows you to test your code in conditions that are more similar to what your code would be running once deployed.

    For an artist, a massively fast computer (or really just one with an assload of RAM) allows more multitasking. Having Photoshop, Illustrator, a compositing app, etc etc, open all at once is great for productivity, and it allows you to bounce between apps without huge downtime.

    But a few examples of why speed is still important in computing.

  5. Re:Yes, but... by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You say that like it's a bad thing. If I need telnet I'll just get PuTTY anyways. The only thing telnet is good for anymore is checking to make sure SMTP traffic works and configuring devices that won't talk with anything else. Otherwise you *don't* use it any more that you use rsh or rcp.

    Frankly, I'm more irritated that Windows doesn't ship with a built-in ssh and sshd. And no, remote desktop does not count.

    --
    The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.