Slashdot Mirror


Linux Not Supported For Democratic Convention Video

bucketoftruth writes "If you browse to the Democratic Convention website and attempt to check out any of their upcoming streams, you bump into the following limitation: 'We're sorry, but the Democratic Convention video web site isn't compatible with your operating system and/or browser. Please try again on a computer with the following Compatible operating systems: Windows XP SP2, Windows Vista, or a Mac with Tiger (OS 10.4) or Leopard (OS 10.5). Compatible browsers: Internet Explorer (version 6 or later), Firefox (version 2), or, if you are on a Mac, Safari (version 3.1) also works.'"

16 of 794 comments (clear)

  1. Silverlight by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 0, Troll

    For the best Democratic Convention video experience, you'll need the Microsoft Silverlight plug-in and the Move Networks media player.

    Ugh. What could these possibly offer that couldn't be done with, say, Flash?

  2. Re:NASA too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yeah, nothing to see here, there are heaps of sites like that. They can't test with all the distros, and versions of distros, and why would you bother? That's why Linux will never take off as a desktop solution on mass.

    Even my online banking has special support for my iPhone browser, but it won't work with my friend's Linux box.

    Linux's failure in the desktop market has nothing to do with quality of the product. It's purely the result of a fragmented product with too many versions.

  3. Re:Priorities by Ticklemonster · · Score: -1, Troll

    Bravo Democrats.

    I want the Democratic Party to spend its money defeating McCain. I do not want the Democratic party wasting its money on a partisan Operating System war by supporting a fringe OS that has less than 1% share of the desktop.

    I call foul on this one! Why was this called a troll? That's an honest sentiment. Heck, I'm in the McCain camp AND USE LINUX, so I really don't have any reason to pull for sakusha, but honestly, Score:-1, Troll? Give me a break!

    --
    Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  4. translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    You $hould be able to do both with ogg theora. GNU/Linux ha$ done $treaming media well for age$. If you don't believe me contemplate the flexibility of MythTV front and back end$.

    They are, at lea$t bright enough to u$e Apache (Red Hat)
    --

    Friend$ don't help friend$ in$tall Microsoft Corporation unliked $tuff.

  5. Re:User agent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Linux who cares?

  6. Idiots by Sam36 · · Score: -1, Troll

    OMG I hate liberals so much. Read your history books, the president is here to protect the country, that is all! Listen, if you people want free toilet paper, free money, and faster internet then go bother someone else! IDIOTS!

  7. Re:So what? by jmkaza · · Score: 1, Troll

    Live streams require a solid infrastructure of distributed systems providing multi-cast feeds. Flash Server licenses on all those machines gets real expensive, real quick.

  8. Re:Doesn't matter to me by digital_rich · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'll probably vote for the Libertarian candidate Bob Barr. Not that it matters, my state will vote for Osama Obama anyway.

  9. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    they're going to lose support from all the linux fags. as well all know fags are big amongst the democrats. oh well, fags can go back to videos of fags eating shit out of the asses of other fags.

  10. Re:Furthermore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Look at that. That's what's called a "joke." They have them on the Daily Show and Stephen Colbert, if you're interested, but as I recall they haven't developed them yet for the right wing.

  11. Re:Email Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    All 12 truly devoted linux desktop users will now reply. The other 14 part time linux users will turn to their Windows gaming rig and use IE.

    But everybody here just wants to whine, anyway, so nobody's going to actually write.

    All of that said, I just installed the evil Silverlight plugin on my Mac, and I have to admit, the video quality was stunning. That's the bet I've ever seen a live video stream look, by far.

  12. Re:Doesn't matter to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    LOOK AT THIS BUNCH OF IDIOTS WRITING HARSH JOKES AT THE REPUBLICANS.

    Still it needs just one joke on the N_GGER Hussein II and you get immediately modded as "FLAMEBAIT"&"TROLL"

    Well I do remember that it was mr Hussein IIthat asked for political matters to be realeased under CC and still it looks they are using a proprietary format. So maybe he's not much of a NAGGER but really he manages quite effectively in annoying me: he doesen't uphold even a stupid promise.

    Sig: In Politically Correct America you can't talk about anything without consulting a lawyer.

  13. Re:Doesn't matter to me by Bryansix · · Score: 0, Troll

    You know it is sad but true. I didn't vote for McCain in the primaries but he is who the Republican party got stuck with. He needs to wake up and start learning to have a real tech platform and soon. For one thing he needs to get on the right side and be FOR net neutrality even if he doesn't think that means legislation is needed just yet.

    Barack Hussein Obama (Barry Soetoro) may have a good tech platform on his website but HE DIDN'T WRITE IT! In fact I doubt he knows about half the stuff up there. Even if that is his tech platform I think we can all agree that electing a President that has already started down the slippery slope of saying its ok to let babies die by denying them medical care would be a really bad idea.

  14. Re:Doesn't matter to me by fugue · · Score: 1, Troll

    Does the president have to know everything? I don't think Carter is eligible for re-election, and he was the last of his kind. If a president has advisors whom he trusts, and if he chose them well, and if he keeps tabs on what they're doing and gives them good high-level direction, that isn't such a bad thing. Consider Bush: IQ of about 4, and yet staggeringly effective at pushing his culture of greed, terror, ignorance, and whatnot, simply because he chose people who could be effective on his behalf. Not a bad system, if you're a good judge of character and if your heart is in the right place.

    I'm not saying Obama's heart is in the right place. I don't really know; signs point to him not being a total disaster, and at least he obviously has a brain. I do know that McCain is at least as bad as Bush, completely obsessed with power, wealth, and the destruction of his sworn foes the Democrats and anything they stand for, good or bad.

    And, like it or not, we have a system in which choosing anyone besides one of those two is almost the same as not voting. (Of course, voting is almost the same as not voting, as various Diebold employees have pointed out...).

    --
    "The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place."
  15. Re:Doesn't matter to me by digital_rich · · Score: -1, Troll

    oooh an Anonymous Coward called me a name. Incidently it wasn't a troll. I don't respect Obama's far left ideology, and my suspicions of his religious ideology are supported by his attending a "racist" church for 20 years. You're a kool aid drinking lefty plain and simple.

  16. Re:Doesn't matter to me by Bryansix · · Score: -1, Troll

    Why not? Are you actually for infanticide?