Andy Hertzfeld Shares His Thoughts on 25 Years of the Mac
"They're very similar in certain ways — essentially both Apple and Google want to rewrite the rulebook; they don't want to do things in conventional ways. They want to come up with a better way — for everything; that's not even just the technology but the work processes, the work environment, everything has to be unique and better, so they're very similar in that way. One of the ways that they're different has to do with essentially trust of employees. Apple is very secretive within the company; people working on Macs don't know anything about the new iPods, et cetera. Google is extremely open within the company; once you're a Google employee you have access to just about every piece of information there is."
Kathleen is out of town for the weekend, and you know what that means: coke for my nose, cock for my ass. If you're hung like a nigger, give me a call.
-- CmdrTaco
...ripping of FOS software and giving nothing back except for the compulsory parts (thanks to GPL)?
...being backed by a 156 billion $ company behind it and still about the same marketshare as Linux?
...completely locking your users to that company, taking away all freedom?
Congratulations, I guess.
As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
The iPhone has been a massive success, idiot, technical problems in a small number of bad batches aside.
On the other hand, what is a miserable failure is your posting history. Of all the "newer" regular posters I see here, you have to be one of the most staggeringly stupid.