Slashdot Mirror


The Power Grid Can't Handle Wind Farms

DesScorp writes "The Times reports on the problems of adding wind farms to the power grid. Because of the grid's old design, it can't handle the various spikes that wind farms sometimes have, and there's no efficient way to currently move massive amounts of that power from one section of the country to the other. Further complicating things is the fact that under current laws, power grid regulation is a state matter, and the Federal government has comparatively little authority over it right now. Critics are calling for federal authority over the grid, and massive new construction of 'superhighways' to share the wind power wealth nationally. Quoting the article, 'The dirty secret of clean energy is that while generating it is getting easier, moving it to market is not.'"

5 of 681 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Time for a new Interstate project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I just made a lot of wind. Had chili and beans last night.

    Not so pleasant to experience. Well, the wind making part was pleasant, but the after effects are stifling.

  2. Re:Oh, THAT'S It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You can't handle the Truth!
    The truth is, we live in a world that needs oil. And that oil has to be protected by men with guns. Who's gonna do that? You? I have a greater responsibility.....

  3. Re:The Feds by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Because that's all slashdot's fault, right?

  4. Re:Time for a new Interstate project by Detritus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Literally? I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  5. Here's Why You Want Wind and Solar by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Keep the Baby Killers in their cages.

    First Sgt. Hatley and the Beauchamp TNR Affair

    Updated below
    ---

    A U.S. Army sergeant outed as a murderer in today's NYT seems to be the same one that led the unit involved in last years New Republic / Beauchamp controversy. Then he denied atrocities Beauchamp reported on.

    In July 2007 a U.S. soldier under the pseudonym Scott Thomas wrote about the war in Iraq at the The New Republic's Shock Troops blog. Scott Thomas described some disgusting behavior by his fellow soldiers. Such included running over dogs with Bradley fighting vehicles and playing with a child's scull found in a mass grave.

    The rightwing media, the Weekly Standard, the National Review and many others, went nuts over these reports. The blogger's name was disclosed as Scott Thomas Beauchamp, a member of Alpha Company, 1-18 Infantry, Second Brigade Combat Team, First Infantry Division, and after some heavy push and pull and an army investigation, The New Republic said it "cannot stand by these stories."

    At the time of that controversy, a mil-blogger in the U.S. wrote to Beauchamp's company senior non-commissioned officer, identified as First Sgt. John E. Hatley, and got this response:

    My soldiers conduct is consistently honorable. [...] Again, this young man has a vivid imagination and I promise you that this by no means reflects the truth of what is happening here. I'm currently serving with the best America has to offer. [...]

    Sincerely,

    1SG Hatley

    Today the NYT reports about willful killing of Iraqis who were taken prisoners by the U.S. troops.

    In March or April 2007, three noncommissioned United States Army officers, including a first sergeant, a platoon sergeant and a senior medic, killed four Iraqi prisoners with pistol shots to the head as the men stood handcuffed and blindfolded beside a Baghdad canal, two of the soldiers said in sworn statements.
    ...

    After the killings, the first sergeant -- the senior noncommissioned officer of his Army company -- told the other two to remove the men's bloody blindfolds and plastic handcuffs, according to the statements made to Army investigators, which were obtained by The New York Times.
    ...
    The soldiers, all from Company D, First Battalion, Second Infantry, 172nd Infantry Brigade, have not been charged with a crime.
    ...
    The accounts of and confessions to the killings, by Sgt. First Class Joseph P. Mayo, the platoon sergeant, and Sgt. Michael P. Leahy Jr., Company D's senior medic and an acting squad leader, were made in January in signed statements to Army investigators in Schweinfurt, Germany.

    In their statements, Sergeants Mayo and Leahy each described killing at least one of the Iraqi detainees on instructions from First Sgt. John E. Hatley, who the soldiers said killed two of the detainees with pistol shots to the back of their heads.
    ...
    Last month, four other soldiers from Sergeant Hatley's unit were charged with murder conspiracy for agreeing to go along with the plan to kill the four prisoners, in violation of military laws that forbid harming enemy combatants once they are disarmed and in custody.

    Is the First Sgt. John E. Hatley who l

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."